Nokia 5730 XpressMusic - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.2
- Features
-
8.2
- Performance
-
8.2
- Adin
- Report
I dont know why nokia put 3,2 mpx camera when they could put 5,0.I have 5800 xpm. and the camera su*ks.K800i has better camera then 5800.really depresing
- Reply
- 2009-03-21 12:41
- 0v@i
- C
- Partizan Beograd
- Report
Ryan 5800 is midrange phone 2 becouse of the price and specs although it's touchscreen
- Reply
- 2009-03-21 12:17
- puxu
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Adg @ 2009-03-21 05:52 from ji{RQ3 means 3rd quarter.
- Reply
- 2009-03-21 12:11
- Rx4%
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
Q3 means that the phone is expected to be lauched in the 3rd quater of the year..
- Reply
- 2009-03-21 09:51
- v}Ps
- U
- Bryan
- Report
> In reply to Irkan @ 2009-03-20 09:06 from mI6IIrkan, the E75 is a business phone and that phone is centered around business with this phone is centered around multimedia. Of course the E75 is going to be superior in business terms while this phone might have better multimedia capabilities. You still can't really compare it because they are targeted at different people
- Reply
- 2009-03-21 07:43
- kS4a
- R
- Adg
- Report
What does Q3 mean? I heard from Mobile-review that it will be released on April.
- Reply
- 2009-03-21 05:52
- ji{R
- Q
- Adg
- Report
What does Q3 mean? I heard from Mobile-review that it will be released on April.
- Reply
- 2009-03-21 05:51
- ji{R
- Q
- sky
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-03-17 07:41 from vG1xhey men but is a music phone, you can tell that, but this one is dadicated for 3 things not like e75... i think it is good...
- Reply
- 2009-03-20 17:34
- QxYB
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
both qwerty and stock inputs?
what is mean?
it's huge
- Reply
- 2009-03-20 15:45
- Sbg%
- U
- dinesh
- Report
not bad.but not good then other model features.its very expencive
- Reply
- 2009-03-20 12:43
- vG4N
- U
- Dinesh
- Report
> In reply to DSAGAR @ 2009-03-17 11:39 from i4c7its looking good.but the features are same as 5800.not good.but not bad
- Reply
- 2009-03-20 12:39
- vG4N
- R
- Irkan
- Report
> In reply to Bryan @ 2009-03-20 06:04 from kS4aBryan, interms of features, this phone and the E75 are practically the same, the only obvious difference that people can see is that this is named "5730 XM" while the other one is "E75". (leave the design aside)
i think its completely fine to compare both interms of features and cost.
- Reply
- 2009-03-20 09:06
- mI6I
- R
- Said ahmed
- Report
Wow its a nyc fone,this time nokia r releasing best phones.5730 its a new design wich it looks so beautiful and it occupy high memory...
- Reply
- 2009-03-20 06:15
- M@T2
- R
- Bryan
- Report
You guys aren't even comparing phones properly. Comparing this to the E75 is like comparing apples and oranges...you just can't. This phone is a midrange phone targeted at teens who love music and texting (like in the US) and the E75 is a business phone.
You can't really compare this too the 5800 either because thats a high end phone with a lot of nice features while this just has enough features to make people happy..thats why its midrange and 5800 is high end. DUH!
- Reply
- 2009-03-20 06:04
- kS4a
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed