Nokia 6070 - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
1.7%
Total hits:
1730595

Voting results

Design
7.1
Features
6.7
Performance
6.9
Votes:
3958

I'm afraid the handset would carry hidden bugs like the old nokia 3200 did..

The announced price is so cheap in comparison to the:
- IrDa,
- Camera,
- Push to talk,
- MP3 ringtones,
- Voice memo and Voice command &
- EDGE

which all were not found at nokia 6030..

6 months ago Nokia 6030 was 800 EGPs and now it's around 700 pounds, while Nokia 6070 is supposed to be only 922 L.E .. I wonder do all these features worth only 122 pounds
(around only 21 U$D) ?

I bet that this phone will have a great manufacture bug..

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-23 16:36
  • n9jb
  • U

I've a plan buying Nokia 6020, but now there's Nokia 6070...
6020 = TFT display with no Radio FM
6070 = CSTN display with Radio FM

So which is the best choice?

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-23 09:43
  • PFg%
  • U

CSTN = to longer the battery life.
the price = 135euros.

thats cheap!!! comparing the features you can get j230 with less resolution , 128*128 and only 500kb?

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-20 17:22
  • Pv9c
  • U

Why on Earth this model, Nokia?
Why not with a good TFT display at almost the same price? Basically a good phone, but spoiled by one important thing, THE DISPLAY.

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-20 08:03
  • CjdQ
  • U

dont be a greedy person, let me ask u all, do u have enough money to buy expensive phone?, this one really is good...

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-20 02:45
  • PFDU
  • U

Its Look and size is good but not Toooooo Good,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,



Display Is Very Bad,,,,

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-18 12:49
  • PVHk
  • U

oh my god...why it has CSTN display??? i want TFT display

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-17 08:15
  • TuIf
  • U

nice fone too bad the memory sucks!!!

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-17 00:50
  • jH@9
  • U

good mobile phone by nokia its better than 6030 because it have video player but main problem is memory why nokia made memory lowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww why nokia why

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 22:53
  • P%@1
  • U

makoona- no BT, thats big factor.

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 10:25
  • AMET
  • U

Repacked 6020 ?

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 09:01
  • b6vy
  • U

I don't get it. Isn't this in the same class as motorola L6? Why does the Mot rank in the 7's and 8's and this gets 5's??? Same or better specs, better looking, more solid and it's a nokia, better rf, better menus. you have to look at where the phone is marketed before you judge it poorly. looks like a very solid mid or entry phone.

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 08:07
  • 4pRV
  • U

hey its cheap phone!!! its better than anything SE, Samsung, are spilling out, only motorola got good low end phones =)

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 07:36
  • Pv9c
  • U

too bad,coz no MMC slots..

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 05:55
  • UdYC
  • U

apparently this phone is gism compatible, can you put any gism into it or does it limit to one type of gism. my piece accepts all types of gism.

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 05:22
  • FvjV
  • U

i agree with guru...this 1 is much2 better than any low end phone from sonyericsson...

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 04:39
  • PFDU
  • U

Just another phone with no news in it ... the design is so bland and awful

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-13 21:08
  • S3bK
  • U

Finally...a CUTE looking basic entry phone

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-13 20:36
  • TS8p
  • U

better that SE J100

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-13 20:10
  • mAZb
  • U

Come on... Why does the SE J100 get better votes than this thing!?

Seriously, this isnīt a great phone but itīs a very nice mid-rnage phone all in all!

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-13 19:25
  • niAw
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.