Nokia 6086 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
5.1
- Features
-
5.2
- Performance
-
5.1
- CeLL
- Report
..Wtf a 2 Mp camera[auto-focus]...with a 176*220 display...what is that sef???..and let me tell you one thing...N95....nokia is like armani,versace...sony-ericsson..are like adidas,nike..compare a t-short from versace with a nike...their is no comparation..u cant tell me that SE are better then nokia...ohh and about the SE w810i.my friend hass a problem with it..the display turn's white..andit takes about3-4 minutes 4 the phone 2 start again...when i was listening 2 music..4 an hour..so the walkman thing..is only 4 comercial porposses...Happy new year 2 All
- Reply
- 2007-01-01 15:42
- pki{
- U
- yuki
- Report
this phone is on the bulky side ive alredy seen it!!! very thick and big.... but it compensate it with its features....
- Reply
- 2006-12-30 04:20
- PEHV
- U
- ssaygin
- Report
128 x 160 pixel screen and wi-fi. that s interesting combinations.
- Reply
- 2006-12-28 12:16
- iL0N
- U
- SeF
- Report
well i think you didn't know SE phones well because i can think that you are a nokia loyalist for some years... if you think 3410 is better, then i should say, 3410 is the most sucking phone i have used as well as 3310, why? because of sudden fall in my pocket that disabled and damaged the LCD... and yeah, i am careless with using my phones, but when i decided to use SE, especially my 10 months K300 as well as HTC tanager(if you don't know it, it is Smart amazing phone from our country) and K700, and sharp GX10i and LG U8330 3g phone... all of them failed me only in the joystick problem except the sharp/LG which has 4-way navigation.. but i have a remedy to it and it's very simple... thanks to @Doul from K750 thread... you wil notice that i have no high-end camera/musicphones at now coz i have a digicam,mp3 player and PC... that is practicality for me...:-)
i have also used 8210,3310,3610,3530 and 3650 as well... and let me tell you, the monochrome nokia phones failed me so much- in signal... if you are in philippines, just ask anyone who have experienced no-signal,damaged ICs and LCD/Keypad mat malfunctions in their monochrome nokias... and they will surelly tell you all of those cons...
have tried nokia jav phones as well also, and it is good, though very inferior to my K300
4-blink error as our technicians here is calling: the most frequent problem in S60-6.0 smartphones like 7650,3650, and more later phones i admit s60-3.0 9.1 os from nokias are more stable though sometimes buggy... but i love n-series and E-series nokias,
and let me tell you again, none of my SE friends have regret buying SEs as they are nokia freaks also... though interface not as user-friendly as nokia, but as advanced/ graphical as symbian...
please man, just be very experienced before judging something you didn't tested well yet. i will not deffinitely say that SE is the best unless i haven't tested most non-smartphones... and that is why nokia is concentrating at smartphones, coz they are really inferior to samsung, Lg, sharp, motorola,and SE in terms of features and looks
anyway i have no intention of ruining this thread with my bible-long post, coz i am not a nokia 6086 user, but i have just speak with my opinion... and contradicted you opinion regarding K300 as well as other SE java phones, peace man:-)
- Reply
- 2006-12-25 11:31
- whB9
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
just because it's new doesn't mean it's chock-full of features. i rather get this simple phone than those flashy, expensive ones which is a magnet for thieves.
- Reply
- 2006-12-25 04:44
- RKpu
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
yes sef...i have a nokia 6131..tel me a sony-ericson witch haz a better display......16 milion colors...like a tv...;)nokia are the best...yes not all of its phone are good...but overall nokia is the no.1..sony has 4-5 phone..ho can keep up with nokia..the rest...rubish..and do not compare k300i with a nokia:)..cuz a 3410 is better than a k300i;) a had a k300 and after 3 months he got on fire:) when i tride 2 charge him and the quality of sony...be serios..they have 2 work on that...srry 4 my english..
- Reply
- 2006-12-24 17:20
- pki{
- U
- SeF
- Report
sorry 786, but can't agree to what you've said...
the crap z310 you are saying is way better than this crapier phone... what's the use of wifi for a non-os phone? voice telephony over wifi is good, but eats alot of battery, nokia looses to SE when it comes to lesser battery consumption... another, why they bring back the crap 500 phonebook entries? all SE's have 1000+ phonebooks,.. in java technology you can see so much difference,.. SE Z310 has been equiped with the latest java platform-7 with added more jsr profiles and this one? another screen of this phone is 262k, wow!!! but look it's C-STN!!!... what a mere crapper thing!!!, they didn't have even 3D graphical environment in their menus as SE's have since K700... even the low-end K300/K310 have 3d animations... the only disadvantage i could see from Z310 is the lack of MS-slot and STN screen which is explainable for it is a mid/low-end phone with a style... and this? it has wifi and card-slot but very crap design, phonebook, java,user friendly but poor interface and the worst of all: mediocre battery compared to SE's
now say again the word crap to SE... you nokia freaks can't just accept the mere fact that SE leads non-os and nokia leads samrtphones only...
- Reply
- 2006-12-23 03:22
- whB9
- U
- nokia user
- Report
Wifi with a tiny screen & only 256k color screen.... is it just me or what...??
- Reply
- 2006-12-19 00:32
- jMyH
- U
- SeF
- Report
nice phone and features, the only thing that prevents me from praising this one is the very very poor display... K310/20 Z310 and Z530 have even better display.. compete it with a Z610 or z550/8 and this one eats dust a lot, only Wifi is good i think but how long? home come nokia could put a high price tag in it with that such a mediocre display? better get 6136 for it would have lower price and is already available, with better screen... does nokia critically thinks of their phone lineups?
- Reply
- 2006-12-09 00:41
- whBH
- U
- manny
- Report
TO ALL THE NOOBS WHO SAY > WIFI IS NOT NEEDED FOR THIS PHONE.. OR WHY THE HELL IT HAS WIFI JUST CUS ITS A LOW LEVEL FEATURE PHONE >>
Nokia's 6086 is not just an ugly clamshell that let's you talk over the Internet, it's an ugly clamshell that let's you talk over the Internet seamlessly.
Utilizing UMA (unlicensed mobile access), the 6086 can connect to service via the 802.11 b/g standard. This allows "for flawlessly switching from quad-band GSM to WLAN coverage, as the environment demands... making them completely transparent to the consumer."
Let's face it, we may be dork techies, but there are way more nerdy things we can be wasting time with than the signal of our mobile phones. Heck, they give technology a bad/good name. Drool for this tiny powerhouse overseas at 200 euros...we just can't get enough UMA.
- Reply
- 2006-12-03 21:17
- C5ks
- U
- Ethos
- Report
Yeppers nokia have once again proved they are losing the plot with this handset.
- Reply
- 2006-12-02 12:41
- nEJy
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
I guess this phone would be practical, for buisness guys who don't need a fancy camera, but would take advantage of the WiFi & the nice calm shell look. The mono display is also quite practical since it's always on, unlike other displays which have to be turn on 2 c miscalls & so on. Still I would like to have a phone like this wz a 1.3 MegaPixel Cam & a flash.
- Reply
- 2006-12-01 01:42
- NhEt
- U
- sam
- Report
hi guys
idont think that this phone is very essential to be released it realy just like any low quality phone come from the big phone maker nokia but the only diffrence is the wifi and memory card slot that is the difference thats only !!!!!!!! please nokia don not release this model no body need that device
- Reply
- 2006-11-30 23:13
- SsS9
- U
- Andy
- Report
I find it hard to believe that a phone like this has WiFi. Quality of camera isnt good. Not the nicest phone but it's is the nicest outa the 4 new announcments
- Reply
- 2006-11-30 19:11
- iLVx
- U
- Michael Edward
- Report
This fon is built with less feature to make it affordable... I wanna get this fon for my extra sim (BACK UP FON)
- Reply
- 2006-11-30 17:57
- P@cs
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed