Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.9
- Features
-
6.7
- Performance
-
6.8
- jo
- Report
LOOK:
6103 for american version 850/1800/1900
quote: ( "by mistake 900 is missing)
(also, "by mistake 1.3 megapixel junk is missing)
900 is NOT USED IN NORTH AMERICA!!!!
is not missed, is just not so needed. a triband phone is enough to go almost anywhere. and sometimes is used just to retrain the phones and not being sold outside it destined region.
the 6101 had a VGA because VGA last year was supposed to mid range phones but every year it goes up a level. so now they have 1.3mpx. they did not forget it!! is just strategy.
- Reply
- 2006-02-24 08:58
- Pv9c
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
BYTHEWAY:
Do you know why Nokia, Samsung and Sony produce so many new models for the last two years and alot of them have similar design?
(just look at Nokis flip/clamshell, 6101, 6103, 6125, etc...)
SIMPLE BECAUSE, all previous year models SUCK! So Nokia, Samsung and Sony have to pump up tones of new models, to fool people.
People will think, that since there are all new models this year, they will have better quality ( HAHA, NO THEY WON'T!).
NOW LOOK AT
Sharp and Panasonic phones range very carefuly. They haven't produced so many new models, because their old models work perfectly.
ENOUGH?
DUH!
- Reply
- 2006-02-20 03:17
- 4sbn
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
I have no doubt lately, that it's a$$$$$$$
$$$$$ rip off stragedy with Nokia and all other brands. And they do it, because it's already prooved to be successful.
LOOK:
6103 for american version 850/1800/1900
( "by mistake 900 is missing)
(also, "by mistake 1.3 megapixel junk is missing)
NOW LOOK AT:
6125 (probably will cost at least $50 more, due to 1.3 megapixel junk sensor), and the phone is quadband! (850/900/1800/1900)
NOKIA KNOWS, that because people are stupid and will want 1.3mp junk , and will want quad band - most of them will buy 6125 and only few will buy 6103).
BYTHEWAY:
I hope that after you buy either 6103 or 6125, you can hear people well on those phones ( The phones are as thin as Nokia 6101). Nokia 6101 is not loud enough!
NOKIA 6170 IS THE WAY TO GO.
THE ONLY PHONE THAT HAS GOOD QUALITY AND NOT OVERPRICED (LOUD SOUND-THICK PHONE! DUH!)
- Reply
- 2006-02-18 10:08
- 4sbn
- U
- texas
- Report
yes they are planning a similar 3g handset actually 2 6131 6136
- Reply
- 2006-02-16 17:55
- Re2L
- U
- Shadrachina Kliteris
- Report
I like this phone a lot, but does anyone know if Nokia has any plans to bring out a similar 3G handset?
- Reply
- 2006-02-08 21:53
- Mnek
- U
- rashmi
- Report
gawd, just bought it yesterday - not sure if it was a great move. cingular here sells it at a good rate but the WAP based service is completely abominable-i think it is for teenagers-can u belive i could play a DJ anc compose music ..
I mean what was nokia thinking??
..the sony ericsson is much better. u can't simply allure a customer with a fancy camera and MMS. I
- Reply
- 2006-02-07 02:52
- 4WY8
- U
- JJT
- Report
you know wat pips.. we are on the date and updated here in the philippines when we are talking about nokia staff cellphones.. damn thats the 1 thing i like in the philippines.. and by the way we are the capital text messaging user in the world.. hehehe thats y theres a no doubt we are up to date cellphones here.. FILIPINO RULES!!!!
- Reply
- 2006-02-01 08:45
- RKpX
- U
- JJT
- Report
yes!! this phone is just an ordinary phone.. basically fits for the girls who are in middle class.. but still its good and stable.. durability is on this phone.. we already have this phone here in the philippines since the 3rd quarter of 2005, actually my mom already have this kind of fone. well thats what i can say its durable stable easy to use phone.. but you forgot it also had a screen on the front..
- Reply
- 2006-02-01 08:40
- RKpX
- U
- kalcool
- Report
With 65k color sceern, only 4mb memory and ugly antena, its basically a Low-end phone with Mid-range price.
- Reply
- 2006-01-17 02:19
- jc}9
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
The Nokia 6125 will cost just 30 euros more, and it is full of features that the 6103 won't have (plus, a better design without external antenna). I don't see ANY reason whatsoever to buy this phone over a superior 6125.
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_6125-1409.php
- Reply
- 2006-01-16 19:45
- ixc%
- U
- Iv
- Report
http://www.mobi.kz/mobiles/nokia/6103.html - they write that this phon will be available only in 2nd quarter, is it true?
- Reply
- 2006-01-15 14:02
- niXH
- U
- Nokia 6103
- Report
this phone looks awesome!!! i was gonna get the 6101 about 2 months ago, but i didn't get it bcoz i didn't have enough, so know i am gonna wait for it to come out in Australia!!!
i was gonna buy the 5140i but this phone is a flip phone! HAS BLUETOOTH and is an awesome little phone!!!! Buy it for sure!!!
- Reply
- 2006-01-13 06:52
- P%rj
- U
- Cesaritox
- Report
It's a good mid-range phone with a low memory I mean, for mp3 tones, it's too low, at least it should have 12mb like SE K300.
The display is brighter and fast responsive, a TFT 65k, but in sun sometimes it sucks.
Adding bluetooth to it, is useless for me,They should have do it from the very beginning with Nokia 6101, I see nonsense to added in a new mobile phone with the same specifications and same shape.
- Reply
- 2006-01-12 19:01
- Pve9
- U
- wow LOL !
- Report
this phone takes me back to the year 2001 great features 3 colours on the screen at least 5 megs of memory that well keep you busy ages its even got a front colour screen so you can always see the trusting clocking LOL ! but always remember there are other phones out there at this price with 2 mega pixle cames mp3 super screen 3g memory cards and loads more
- Reply
- 2006-01-11 22:19
- mXBu
- U
- Mauro
- Report
Nokia is my favorite brand, but whit this movil... my god, Nokia can do it better... this is just a 6101 whit bluetoot. Maybe add to bluetooth, + memory for example???
- Reply
- 2006-01-10 02:20
- iBtv
- U
- gwapz
- Report
Its a freakin Mid-Range phone like they specified.. Don't you know how to read? if you want all that features get yourself a 6260..
Nokia makes their phones by class...
- Reply
- 2006-01-08 21:37
- 4t8h
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed