Nokia 6103 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.9
- Features
-
6.7
- Performance
-
6.8
- texas
- Report
why same memory size only bluetooth being added thats lame this is the first time i am knocking Nokia they should have at least up the memory size to 12mb
- Reply
- 2006-01-06 21:54
- Re2L
- U
- ryq
- Report
aside from new face and bluetooth, they should have remove the antenna or at least use 265k tft for internal screen!
- Reply
- 2006-01-06 14:45
- PZtr
- U
- Slavyan
- Report
I think so too. It's a very well concidered move by Nokia. There are ppl who'll never use features like that so they dont want to give money for that. Thay only talk on their phones and what they care is the design. And if it's for little money then even better. I, personally would never buy phone like that bic I'm used to smartphones. But there are a lot of ppl who would buy ot and nokia knows that, so I think it will eventually be a bestseller for the lower class mobiles.
- Reply
- 2006-01-06 11:32
- n2Z$
- U
- Ray
- Report
big turning point about this phone will be the price. If it matches the 6101 price point, it will be cheapest phone with bluetooth and camera (be it VGA). Lets hope Nokia doesn't price themselves out of the market.
- Reply
- 2006-01-06 11:31
- AMET
- U
- bp
- Report
cmon cut the crap.. when will ppl stop looking the artificial support 4 sony-e?? is it a case of sour grapes?? i can c phones without camera or bluetooth gettin scores in high 7s.. this is a pretty decent cell with nice retro design.. will have many takers..
- Reply
- 2006-01-06 10:34
- PVdi
- U
- he he he
- Report
As I thought..... FREE from t-Mobile in USA..hehe. With all these poor features and and waoo!! an external antena, I wont even take it with $100 cash back. What a Crap!!
- Reply
- 2006-01-06 10:24
- 42xW
- U
- King Kong
- Report
What a pity for Nokia. Exterior antenna, tiny memory...just crappy phone. Maybe a nice phone 5 years ago. Nokia should have a look at Samsung clamshell phones.
- Reply
- 2006-01-06 06:16
- PWx9
- U
- jo
- Report
its a 6101 with a different design and bluetooth =) really this phone its going to compete with moto phones and samsung phones in here, which are offering less only the razr can compete in the price is higher
- Reply
- 2006-01-06 01:52
- Pv9c
- U
- Dreadnought
- Report
Same for SE J230, 7.8 in features and it doesnt even have a camera or radio! I am not on anybodys side, just a thing you clearly notice when seeing how people vote for SE and Nokia phones...
- Reply
- 2006-01-05 21:48
- niAY
- U
- Dreadnought
- Report
This is interesting, this phone is currently rated with 4.9 for features, and the SE J220 for example does not have anything really better than this phone but still it has been given considerably better marks... Why?
- Reply
- 2006-01-05 21:46
- niAY
- U
- he he he
- Report
This should be a FREE phone with service or may be even some cash back.
- Reply
- 2006-01-05 20:32
- jc}9
- U
- J
- Report
Cheaper, then its worth the money as a lower end mobile.
I think Nokia can develop the spec but keep the shell of the phone.
They could compete with Samsung clam shell phones. o.O
- Reply
- 2006-01-05 17:42
- I7Bi
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed