Nokia 6121 classic - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
1.1%
Total hits:
689926

Voting results

Design
7.7
Features
7.8
Performance
7.9
Votes:
1841

hows the music quality and how good is the stereo speakers is it better than 6233 .what earphones are supplied with it.is it worth it to buy.plz somebody do reply thanx.

  • Reply
  • 2007-08-07 09:31
  • vwtd
  • U

hi everyone,
wnated to ask if anyone knows does this phone have a processor of 369Hz or is it something else?

  • Reply
  • 2007-08-05 21:18
  • MEQA
  • U

- 35 MB of user memory
- 64 MB SDRAM, 128 MB ROM
- ARM 11, 369 MHz CPU
2 type of memory?

  • Reply
  • 2007-08-04 00:37
  • ibp}
  • U

ummm yeh reading previouse blogs there is hardley and change from the 6120 and the 6121. i still think the n80 has been my best phone yet its taken a hell of a beating and still works. phones these days only last avg of 12 months...

  • Reply
  • 2007-08-03 01:47
  • PP$8
  • U

M..Nokia what is diffrent than 62120? Nokia lost of it's creatives.Why Nokia don't make series dual mode such on 2GSM or 2GSM and 1CDMA on

  • Reply
  • 2007-08-02 12:01
  • UDNA
  • U

I really want this phone,any clear ideas on when its released? My current phone keeps hanging,I can only put up with this fro so long without going insane, need to know how long I'll have to hold out if I want the 6121

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-30 13:14
  • Sbcb
  • U

This phone also has a headphone jack at the bottom next to the usb port!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-28 19:50
  • PxvC
  • U

The phone is great, you woun't regret it if you buy it, it's better than N73 the symbian edge 3g camera...

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-27 23:23
  • SwHY
  • U

ros 6120 classic is olso available in europe , so ............

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-27 21:46
  • pkL7
  • U

6121 is for Asian & European markets and 6120 for American markets.

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-25 12:49
  • Mmf8
  • U

6121 and 6120 really serve for different market. Although they are both GSM Quad-band phones, the frequency bands of 3G (WCDMA) of 6120 and 6121 adopted are different~~~~

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-18 11:54
  • PSrA
  • U

different markets?are u stupid?these are quad band phones + 3G,they can work all around the world

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-17 15:09
  • mFed
  • U

Which one is for which market?

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-03 15:39
  • pikc
  • U

they are for different markets... thats why.

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-27 02:58
  • Pv9c
  • U

please increase the batt life! the 3 hours talk time is just too short. please increase it to at least 10 hours talk time!

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-26 14:30
  • PUR%
  • U

whats the use of makeing same phone with only one different feature? i totaly dont understand.

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-25 06:39
  • P@$5
  • U

the fone really looks alrite and the features tight,but i wanna know more from someone who has probably used it b4.havin bought 2 nokia phones and wasn't quite impressed with the speed and the rate at which it gets infected.though i'm crazy about nokia phones but i begining to think i shuld stick to the not so complicated ones.

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-24 14:46
  • mtvY
  • U

wat d diffrnce bet dis fon and 6120 classic?

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-22 16:15
  • wYIF
  • U

The only difference between the 6120 and the 6121 is that the 6121 has support for UMTS/HSDPA on the 900Mhz band. That's it! Here's the article. http://www.mobileburn.com/review.jsp?Id=3466

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-22 09:57
  • nbB9
  • U

would anyone plz tell me which phone wud be better for india.i.e 6120 classic or 6121 classic?wats the real difference?

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-22 04:46
  • 49pu
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.