Nokia 6125 - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
845931

Voting results

Design
7.8
Features
7.9
Performance
7.9
Votes:
2206


Sort by:

Is this phone coming to Singapore? I dun seems to see Nokia.com.sg featuring this HP

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-24 06:49
  • ijxY
  • U

hey
take a look at the phones in canada and there is one phone that is symbian that has stereo mp3 player compatible with enny nokia headsets the 6620 and the 6125 are two destinct models there is no os one this flip but the main issue here is it's the best and cheapest way to get a mp3 player and a 1.3 mp camera for this phone!!!!perfect phone for more recomended if you like listening to music and if you ever tried it had it on youre cellphone it,s a mp3 player you would just need the nokia d-15 adapter to plug youre regular headsets
i think it's worth it

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-23 16:41
  • 4Bcp
  • U

Today the size matters in electronics and therefore the card size must as small as possible. I think that is the reason for micro SD instead of mini SD. There will be high capacity micro SDs in future as well...

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-23 14:10
  • MY4R
  • U

I think all the phone manufacturers should stick to one format and thats SD. Its redeculous to buy different cards and then again they dont come in high capacity. With a adapter minroSD/miniSD is same as SD in size..so why not use SD which is available in high capacity? It sucks.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-23 09:54
  • 42xW
  • U

Rusty,

micro-SD is also called Transflash and it is smaller than a mini-SD. mini-SD can be used in a digital camera or other compatible devices cos you got the "adapter" which makes it bigger. Micro-SD is something Samsung and Nokia is using in their future phones. RS-MMC seems to be of an old standard. You can find them in some old Nokia phones.

Please, correct me, anyone.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-22 20:29
  • Sus@
  • U

It has bluetooth (even stereo)
Yes you can listen to music and store a lot of music in it.

It has EDGE (meaning you can download music at a fair rate)

Damn, this is a good one when you go through the specs.

Only €230 ...hmm, is it a joke ? this will sell good all over the world and are really interesting to operators.


Rumors are olso that there is coming a 6131 (3G) and 240X320 screen.

You will also see more clams without antenna in the 3,7,8 Series during Q1 (presented, not i stores) and a couple of them will be thin, thin, thin :)

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-21 10:27
  • S3He
  • U

May I know the difference between Mini SD Card, Micro SD Card and RS-MMC? Thanks very much.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-21 09:43
  • PFMY
  • U

Does this phone actually have bluetooth or not??

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-21 06:43
  • P@Pn
  • U

I can buy the 6101 at 150 dollars without any annual service commitments, hopefully the 6125 is a replacement for it and they keep the price in the same range. I'd buy two!

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-20 21:21
  • j5Js
  • U

I don't think this phone has EDGE, it's not a requirement for me. It's a great phone and I can't wait to get it.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-20 21:18
  • j5Js
  • U

Finally, Nokia has launched the much awaited clamshell with a very good set of features. I hope this model will give a good competition to its arch-rivals Samsung and Motorola, which have an expertise in flip-phones segment. This will be one of the biggest success for Nokia in its clamshell range after 6101. Now Nokia's priority should be to reduce the weight of its clamshells from an average 97-98 grams to 80-85 grams and manufacture light-weight phones. This would prove to be on of the most important factors for Nokia to succeed in the flip-phone market in the long run. On the flip-side, it should also try to increase the screen resolution of its phones, in which Samsung and SonyEricsson are far ahead.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-20 14:32
  • PUE5
  • U

really, this phone was made to be a MIDRANGE clamshell and at ONLY 230 euro, thats better than what the competition have to offer
samsung offers less X800 (only tbe screen and internal memory is better) no radio, no edge, no ptt, no quadband. and the samgsungs are around 350 euro or more...
so really i think a smart one will go for the better featured =)

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-20 03:56
  • Pv9c
  • U

It's funny that some complain about features and base it on comparing this phone with other models that are atleast 50% more expensive which is stupid. This has very good features for it's price (230 eur).

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-19 13:54
  • pddn
  • U

Designer dave,

Just FYI, this phone uses a micro-SD/Transflash card, not a mini-SD card!
I don't know if you meant you wanted to use your mini-SD, which you already have, in this phone...

However, this is a great phone!

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-19 13:39
  • SgnM
  • U

was looking for a clamshell quadband phone, thought only Moto had them, now I'll wait for this phone. I can really use the miniSD card feature, for pics and tunes.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-19 03:04
  • j5Js
  • U

Wants again, the consumers have proved my point that i stress on over and over. People pay so much attention to the look of the phone, they miss its true puprose. "communication"
Poeple, this phone has everything.

So what, the camera doesn't have a flash. The thing that people don't realise is that once a flash is installed on a cellphone you reduce the life of your powercell. Evertime a flash is activited on a camera, a huge amount energy is drained from you battery.

How do i know this? For people who have common sense and a digital camera, i mean a real one, you would know that its only practical to have a charger along with rechargeable batteries. The LCD (which a cellphone has also) and the flash(which a cellphone not suppose to have) is very demanding on a battery.

So when looking at a phone, just remeber its true purpose, its built for communication. If you want a fancy MP lens and high beam flash, get realistic and use your head, get the equipment that was designed for high end qualtity picutres, go buy a digital camera.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-18 22:44
  • Rn@9
  • U

Nothing to get excited about. After the 6101 low range clamshell, this one is a middle range clamshell. So Nokia will surely come up very soon with a high range one with top specs.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-18 19:50
  • ijvu
  • U

Its a great phone, but the resolution can use some work. It has not adopted from its predecessors like 6233 or the 6234 even the 6230i. If this phone does not have an auto focus or optical zoom then the camera will be worthless. The way i see it, pretty soon there may be a 6125i.

Over all the phone will be hit. Just give it some time.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-18 19:29
  • Rn@9
  • U

The way i see it, this has to be the only clam-phone that nokia has really sat down and put some thought too. Since the company's last success, which in my opionion was the nokia_6230, I really thought that this phone(6125) really had it, but after looking really closely at it, I realised that they still have a little bit more work to do.

Don't get me wrong, i am a huge nokia fan, but this phone may have to go back to the drawing board. Let me break it down for you.

1. the resolution for a new generation phone is weak. It only has 128x160. They severly need to improve on this. 6230 was great, the 6230i was even better. instead of going forward with screen resolution you took a few steps back. Come on nokia, u can do better than this. Look at the nokia 6233 and 6234 they have great resolution and this new 6125 suppose to be a later version? what is going on?

2. Only 1.3MP? come on you can do better than that? Where is the autofocus and the optical zoom like is predecessor, 6230i ? Not even a flash?

3. Even though, i think that the outter shell design works for me, i still think it can be given a little more effort. I mean, look at the nokia N92, Now that is a well designed phone.

4. The internal memory can do alot better. Only 11MB? come one!! We are still not sure if the microSD slot provided with this phone can go up to 2GB.

Over all this phone is still a great phone. But nokia is not capitlising on the success of the 6230 and the 6230i. All they had to do was take the features of either one of those phones(the 6234 is ideal) and do some modern tweaking with it and place it in a well designed clam shell phone and walla!!!!

Nokia is forgetting, they have competitors like SonyEcricsson to deal with. The W810 is amazing!!!

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-18 19:23
  • Rn@9
  • U

Finally, Nokia has launched the much awaited clamshell with a very good set of features. I hope this model will give a good competition to its arch-rivals Samsung and Motorola, which have an expertise in flip-phones segment. This will be one of the biggest success for Nokia in its clamshell range after 6101. Now Nokia's priority should be to reduce the weight of its clamshells from an average 97-98 grams to 80-85 grams and manufacture light-weight phones. This would prove to be on of the most important factors for Nokia to succeed in the flip-phone market in the long run.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-18 18:04
  • PUE5
  • U

Sort by:
Total of 519 user reviews and opinions for Nokia 6125.