Nokia 6136 - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Check Price

Popularity

Daily interest
0.2%
Total hits:
617953

Voting results

Design
6.5
Features
6.5
Performance
6.6
Votes:
1022

fantastic

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-09 11:58
  • M}nJ
  • U

Can anybody tell me the exact function of Wi-Fi? How is it different from GPRS,EDGE and 3G? Is it useful on every network? I am from India and we have network like Airtel,Hutch,Idea etc. Thanx in advance!

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-20 20:16
  • M@T2
  • U

This phone is available now in the UK on Orange, mainly available in the Orange Shops

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-12 23:38
  • mxI0
  • U

You'd think that with the 6131 and the 6133 that they'd improve camera the 6136. That is the only thing that annoys me. I have a 6131 and if they 6133 or the 6136 had a better camera i'd buy it tomorrow!

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-03 00:13
  • PP@6
  • U

Who on earth would want to go online with a display with a resolution of 128 x 160 pixels?? Ridiculous!

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-29 20:15
  • nffx
  • U

The Nokia 6136 is not so good though it looks cool.

The Wi-Fi capability is only available with UMA, i.e. you can't use only Wi-Fi at will, at least with the current firmware.

Has someone found a way to hack the phone so that it can be possible to use Wi-FI independently of the operator UMA stuff ?

Please post about.

  • Reply
  • 2006-12-06 17:46
  • SaJ$
  • U

beware - this phone does not offer uma out of the box. it is network specific!!!! ie orange or tmobile or cingular have to enable the function from the network end, you cannot enable it from the phone - stick with the nokia e60 for an inbuilt sip client

  • Reply
  • 2006-12-02 17:18
  • SpLx
  • U

Don't need Bluetooth!
I realy prefer Wi-Fi 802.11b/g! (54Mbps)

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-26 00:29
  • Ljjn
  • U

this phone is still coming SOON? by the time it comes out, the no Bluetooth and only 1.3 MP cam will not be tolerable anymore.

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-21 05:36
  • U5NX
  • U

I thought Nokia's 6125 battery was 5hr talk time! (magic for 820 mAh? -Really bytheway 720 mAh!).

Here we have the twin of that phone with a more honest battery specs from Nokia!
3hr TALK TIME!

I just hope that most people who use Nokia, Motorola and Sony phones already know that this fact, thet if the battery between 700 and 100 mAh, then it suck! (especially on hig resolutions screan phones)

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-09 05:34
  • 4sbn
  • U

without bluetooth?don't buy this phone la..

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-05 14:08
  • 25rd
  • U

There are a lot of places on the world where wifi isn't awailable. And bluetooth isn't only for a earphone device, for example I use it for transfer data between my cellphone and a determinated PC, where I want, it's more comfortable than a data cable... besides, on this time a phone without a basic function (whatever, could be bluetooth, camera, mp3 player, etc) is a incomplete phone... defenitively Nokia made a mistake here...

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-03 09:49
  • iBtv
  • U

At last a small phone with wifi, no bluetooth so what? If you insist on looking stupid with a bluetooth earpiece thinking you look cool then choose from the 10000000 other phones available. But if you want a useful phone with wifi get this or something the size of a brick. Bluetooth is just a limited version of wifi anyway, soon you will see wlan headsets for all the people who insist on looking like a borg dork anyway.

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-03 00:57
  • nEeS
  • U

It doesnt have BT & iR because have WiFi. if you like the other connections buy a 6131.

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-28 03:11
  • Lx1u
  • U

i'm from Argentina & here YES it have bluetooth... so, i don't know... somebody more that know about this?

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-26 03:16
  • PwRf
  • U

I rather this phone have BT than IR. more practical. Oh well...

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-19 08:28
  • T2yJ
  • U

it has wifi but it hasnt bluetooth???????????????????????????????????????­?????????????

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-15 12:35
  • nsDK
  • U

If they would have added QVGA and bluetooth it would be very good. Now itīs just average.

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-08 19:53
  • niAj
  • U

device is nice but camera does not take very clear pictures ,and falls short because bluetooth is not included

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-28 16:47
  • PvW1
  • U

Very good, with wifi !!
it's available the 5 of october in France...

  • Reply
  • 2006-09-27 15:03
  • M0c$
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.