Nokia 6216 classic - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
1.8%
Total hits:
218671

Voting results

Design
5.5
Features
5.6
Performance
5.7
Votes:
373

I am a Nokia user for over ten years now. There were times that I also tried the other handsets but nothing beats NOKIA. User friendly, very handy, the features and quality is SUPER DUPER ULTRA great and most of all, VERY durable.

Those who are posting negative comments about Nokia, be sure that what you pride of is deserving for that or s else it would just be a shame to US who tried their handsets too.

I like this phone. I can't wait to have another smart phone from you (nokia) guys.

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-05 12:56
  • PSk%
  • U

> In reply to krish @ 2009-05-04 14:32 from wdTdIf noone brought out budget phone there would be a whole market lost. Look at Nokia Vs HTC, HTC make mostly high end phones, Nokia make all ranges, from the $60 to the $1000+

Its a smart business decision to bring out low and high end phones

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-05 01:32
  • 2GTx
  • R

nokia please stop creating bricks and soap boxes. try to bring some mobiles in market. look samsung and LG

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-04 14:32
  • wdTd
  • C

> In reply to Art @ 2009-05-01 04:25 from UD{@how much is 6216

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-02 10:52
  • vxpI
  • R

This is just another version of 3120 classic... Features is almost the same...

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-01 04:25
  • UD{@
  • U

just another budget phone..

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-30 12:30
  • xJHf
  • U

what is the cost

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-30 04:31
  • w43x
  • R

beautifull feature butt cost is issue

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-29 10:36
  • uRBa
  • U

Hi
Same old functions nothing is new,Like old shape,etc.

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-29 10:17
  • uCwL
  • U

GOOD................

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-29 08:44
  • uCkS
  • U

> In reply to Helpmaster @ 2009-04-28 12:25 from u1vFvery good phone but very expensive

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-28 14:53
  • v0kq
  • U

> In reply to Helpmaster @ 2009-04-28 12:25 from u1vFvery good phone but very expensive

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-28 14:52
  • v0kq
  • R

> In reply to Helpmaster @ 2009-04-28 12:25 from u1vFvery good phone but very expensive

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-28 14:50
  • v0kq
  • R

I read all its specifications. So as its specification we guess that it is good mobile. It is slim and also good in color. So its shape also attracted people much.

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-28 12:25
  • u1vF
  • C

I guess the upgrade over 3120c is probably the bulid quality, it probably comes with a memory card and a mini usb cable and Adobe Flashlite 3.0

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-28 10:05
  • ucII
  • U

Hmmm......6233 is a much better than this one. why nokia is making such devices. no improvement in terms of specs. Bad Phone.....

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-27 22:01
  • kDSf
  • C

i think this phone is an excellent upgrade for 6230i or 6230 but unfortunately i am having a better upgrade which is n81 8gb

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-27 17:33
  • M{3J
  • U

> In reply to rei ayanami @ 2009-04-27 13:04 from PDPbyes you are right, this phone is great

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-27 13:38
  • kKHj
  • R

this phone is so great!

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-27 13:04
  • PDPb
  • U

nowadays nokia's are making all classic crap phones..!

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-26 17:36
  • utaP
  • C

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.