Nokia 6220 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.0
- Features
-
7.9
- Performance
-
8.0
- Aishwarya
- Report
i was having dis fon 4 around 2 yrs, i feel its tooo bad....plz dont buy and spend ur money behind dis piece plzzz..its realy bad
- Reply
- 2007-05-19 16:53
- 2@qR
- U
- kulas
- Report
wow this phone is great, it eds cellphone. its really rocks!!!!!!!
- Reply
- 2006-12-10 07:09
- i}2U
- U
- Maeko
- Report
Btw, if u buy this ph0nE, u must upgrade da mem0rY.. cuZ da reaL mem0rY is just a wasTe..
iupgradEd it. n n0w i haVe a 5mB mem0rY.. it d0esnT cosT mucH t0 upgraDe. im haPpY with da mem0rY n0w.. i can taKe piC Like aLm0sT 500piX
- Reply
- 2006-12-05 09:42
- ibe1
- U
- wap wizard
- Report
a perfect phone fon non techie people.
its very simple to use. and so many features. in a very low value. pick one now
- Reply
- 2006-12-04 13:26
- R5vx
- U
- Jonathan
- Report
Really nice phone. When you're up for a colored phone with camera, video and voice recorder, this would be a good pick. Plus it's very affordable. I got mine about more than 2 years ago and up to now it still functions well. It's sleek, fashionable and simple. I just got a black casing for it and it really looks glamorous. About the IrDa, it takes patience to send or receive files, and connect it to your pc. About the radio, you really have to put the headset right. Nothing's wrong with mine. Only I wish it had a bigger memory. But anyway, it's great!! I'm planning of buying a new phone but I wouldn't sell this one. :)
- Reply
- 2006-11-30 10:16
- PRQv
- U
- BAYOM CLEF
- Report
hi av use this fone b4 but i loss it pls how can i get it back thank ........
- Reply
- 2006-11-23 16:03
- ftQx
- U
- oh my god
- Report
ok people u are not goin to believe this i had this phone for about 2 years ok one day i was messaging it just blow up in my hand it just like a fire cracker my hand was very sore
- Reply
- 2006-10-27 14:07
- U2Pa
- U
- Georges Mahili
- Report
I have a N6220, it is a nice phone but the problem with it is the radio and the Ifrared. cant access the radio and whenever i put an original headset, it tells me "connect an enhacement e.g. headset".Then the Irad does not work.What is the problem?
- Reply
- 2006-08-17 11:24
- mivh
- U
- Tope
- Report
Its is smat, handible and easy to use. it as long durability and an outstanding design which gives it that cute look. i would recomend the phone for basic mobile phone users.
- Reply
- 2006-08-05 04:44
- mJ1I
- U
- Mike
- Report
I just wrote a review for my temporary (and new) Motorola SLVR, and this phone has beat the Moto. It's been at my service for three years and it's survived a LOT: freezing temps, boiling temps, being stepped on, chewed on, kicked, and thrown. Still working. It's really small, even when compared to today's ugly and chunky flip-phones. Features are good, basic, and easy-to-use. Scrolling is a breeze because it's fast--there are no fancy-schmancy things to inhibit the scrolling-speed. Finding a contact or message is easy as well. It's also plastic, so it won't immediately adjust to the surrounding temps (unlike metal). I've been very very satisfied with this phone.
- Reply
- 2006-07-17 07:38
- YH}E
- U
- leon
- Report
this is a nice phone but i just want to know more about the gprs and edge of this phone aswll to activate its edge or does it work atoumaticaly plz can someone help me great stuff nokia
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 08:36
- Nxsf
- U
- Vlad
- Report
Please someone tell me exactly how much memory this phone has.i am interested to buy it.my email is Vlad1988@gmail.com
- Reply
- 2006-05-23 13:28
- nDLj
- U
- robbo
- Report
Hi i bought this phone well (nokia 6225 telstra cdma cos im in rural australia) but its basically the same damn thing
the camera is about a 4 out of 10
the reception on the loud speaker is a 5 out of 10
and the signal reception is about a 8 out of 10
thanx for reading my thoughts
I BOUGHT THIS PHONE COS I LIVE IN A RURAL AREA AND I WANTED A CAM PHONE THE CAMERA IS RUBBISH THE 3200 HAS A BETTER CAMERA (supposedly the same camera)
- Reply
- 2006-01-05 12:09
- AeF6
- U
- KikiRiki
- Report
I realy like it when he go live but i wate a little more and there was 6230 which is alot better. 6220 hvae a realy good battery but his options are little. There is no mp3, bad camera, little memory. His outside lock is good anyway. If you need a phone for speacking generally and for work i belive that this one is it!
- Reply
- 2005-12-28 08:40
- S9ue
- U
- frogy
- Report
i had this phone 1 year ago...last x-mass i got it..the phone looks great but its features are...bad,bad,bad no mp3 and the cif camera...then my only wish it was having a 6230 phone..but i boaught myself a moto v620 keep it for a month and then the 6230 and i am a proud owner of this phone ever now
- Reply
- 2005-12-18 10:31
- nxtY
- U
- chris
- Report
My friend has the phone and the camera is the wrost camera i have ever seen I thought my sony erricson was bad this is terrible I have the 6101 and is a really good phone and a lot better camera
- Reply
- 2005-11-17 23:59
- CfhA
- U
- Pengo
- Report
Ive had the 6220 for on 12 months now and have found it to be robust and relatively trouble free. The Camera is a waste of time and I continually since new have had trouble with the signal dropping out in service areas and having to turn it on and off again to get it to search for a signal. Also if it sits in your pocket all day the cover and screen scratch very easily. Well its time to update now ......it will be a Nokia but not this model......any suggestions?
- Reply
- 2005-09-30 10:28
- AeJc
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed