Nokia 6220 classic - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.3
- Features
-
8.5
- Performance
-
8.4
- omer
- Report
> In reply to Chad @ 2008-06-22 15:54 from vCK6we all are counting on you about the review of your 6220 classic.about everything... So wite this early.okiz take care
- Reply
- 2008-06-23 20:12
- 25LH
- U
- aatu
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-06-23 12:21 from n4Wb(Part 3, because this board doesn't seem to like "arrow"-symbols. Now in full text, mods/admins can delete parts 1 and 2)
Like you can see from my previous post, I don't mind paying a little premium, if the specs are right. In this case the specs are better for 6220c, even though it's cheaper (I would have liked to have (less than(!))13mm thickness, but 6220c was best there is with Xenon).
The last line in your post kind of puzzles me. You show specs and ask for opinions concerning style etc.?
The only thing relating to style on specs is physical size, in which Nokia is better, btw... (You do know the G810 is kind of a brick?)
Furthermore, G810 is more likely to be compared with Nokia N82 (in size, price, etc). Yet I chose 6220c over N82.
But regarding price vs. specs: G810 would have to be 30-40% cheaper than 6220c for me to consider it.
And about cameraphones: that's exactly what I wanted, so that I could have camera with me all the time, without it taking extra space. And 6220c is targeted to this genre.
But if you want a basic, shiny mobile, I'd say LG KF510 (!), KF750, KE970, KE850 or Samsung F480, F490 (!), Armani are best choices.
- Reply
- 2008-06-23 18:23
- nxPY
- R
- aatu
- Report
> In reply to aatu @ 2008-06-23 18:09 from nxPY(Part 2, I don't know why it capped this...)
... (I would have liked to have
- Reply
- 2008-06-23 18:15
- nxPY
- R
- aatu
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-06-23 12:21 from n4WbLike you can see from my previous post, I don't mind paying a little premium, if the specs are right. In this case the specs are better for 6220c, even though it's cheaper (I would have liked to have
- Reply
- 2008-06-23 18:09
- nxPY
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to aatu @ 2008-06-22 19:13 from nxPYNokia 6220 classic, 108 x 47 x 15 mm,
5 MP, 2592х1944 pixels,
Carl Zeiss optics,
autofocus, video(VGA 30fps),
Xenon flash; secondary videocall camera
240 x 320 pixels, 2.2 inches
Standard battery, Li-Ion 900 mAh (BP-5M)
Samsung G810 103 x 52.9 x 17.9 mm
5 MP, 2560х1920 pixels,
autofocus, face detection,
video(VGA),
xenon flash,
3x optical zoom
240 x 320 pixels, 2.6 inches
Standard battery, Li-Ion 1200 mAh
That is easy to compare,there is list of specifications !
What is the price for the distinction betwen this two phones in aspect of style,look,quality, emotions ?
- Reply
- 2008-06-23 12:21
- n4Wb
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to aatu @ 2008-06-22 19:13 from nxPYOK aatu. It is your opinion and your choice about what you prefere. I respect that. But I do think that mob .phone is not even close to real digital camera, with xenon or not whatever. That is why i own real digital cameras Fuji fd100 and Pentax K200, 10-100 times better than any mobile phone. I just want stylish, fast responsive, with clear and loud talking sound, user friendli phone with excelent quality. I realy think that the choice is one. Samsung. My opinion is based on my 10 year experience with many Samsung, Motorola, Nokia, Sagem, Ericson, Sony Ericson, LG, Alcatel phones. I do want to buy some HTC like TouchPro but.....it is way to expensive for just "mobile phone" and i realy do not need so many options (i have laptop for that), except that superb VGA screen :). The same for iPhone.
- Reply
- 2008-06-23 12:07
- n4Wb
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to aatu @ 2008-06-22 19:13 from nxPYOK aatu. It is your opinion and your choice about what you prefere. I respect that. But I do think that mob .phone is not even close to real digital camera, with xenon or not whatever. That is why i own real digital cameras Fuji fd100 and Pentax K200, 10-100 times better than any mobile phone. I just want stylish, fast responsive, with clear and loud talking sound, user friendli phone with excelent quality. I realy think that the choice is one. Samsung. My opinion is based on my 10 year experience with many Samsung, Motorola, Nokia, Sagem, Ericson, Sony Ericson, LG, Alcatel phones. I do want to buy some HTC like TouchPro but.....it is way to expensive for just "mobile phone" and i realy do not need so many options (i have laptop for that), except that superb VGA screen :). The same for iPhone.
- Reply
- 2008-06-23 12:04
- n4Wb
- R
- RMS
- Report
> In reply to Chad @ 2008-06-22 15:54 from vCK6ok bravo i got it.so you are the lucky one using the phone.well i m from uae and still waiting to get my hands on this preety device.dear can you tell me about the sound quality and battery..i will be very thankful to u and how is ur xperinz what u will suggest me for nokia 6220 c
- Reply
- 2008-06-23 09:55
- SkEn
- R
- user
- Report
i would like to know why nowdays all nokia model has high SAR value rate? Hopefully nokia would do something, at least below 1.0
- Reply
- 2008-06-23 04:06
- ceqx
- U
- aatu
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-06-21 21:03 from iGfANote: "Flash" does not equal to Xenon-flash, so most of those mentioned phones don't apply.
About build: I haven't tested that many phones, but yes, rumours state that to get 6220c low priced, they're compromising on material quality. Time will tell how it plays out.
About style: I already stated other manufacturers have some nice looking and thin alternatives, but to be honest, I don't think 6220c is ugly, either. Whatever rocks your boat, I guess.
And if you want something beautiful, I'd say LG KF510 is VERY nice, but that's pretty much all there is for that phone...
About some of the suggested phones (the rest have even more flaws):
Yes, i900 would be very nice, except it doesn't come with Xenon, AND it will cost way more. I could even forgive 100€ (max) price premium over 6220c if it had Xenon (and lens cover btw).
G810 would also be nice, except it costs more and it's thicker.
F490 is very nice (I even thought about getting this one), except no Xenon or GPS. IF it had at least Xenon (and lens cover woulnd't do harm either), I'd buy this one. (It's thin, 5Mpix, 3.3" screen and almost as cheap as 6220c.)
PS. To RMS about "fake posts": For example in Finland, some stores have stated small on-and-off stocks since mid-June...
- Reply
- 2008-06-22 19:13
- nxPY
- R
- Chad
- Report
> In reply to lil_junk @ 2008-06-22 16:54 from F4psYes you can set Mp4 videos for ringtones.
@ Michael yes i got it on a contract
- Reply
- 2008-06-22 18:06
- vCK6
- R
- Michael
- Report
> In reply to lil_junk @ 2008-06-22 16:54 from F4psso this phone is in Australia I want to see it in the Philippines as soon as possible. So you got yours with a contract is that correct, good deal in my opinion
- Reply
- 2008-06-22 17:54
- R5vW
- R
- Chad
- Report
> In reply to RMS @ 2008-06-22 14:26 from SkEnMate i'm no fake here is a pic of my monitor screen taken by my new Nokia 6220c.
http://img45.imageshack.us/img...07008vu1.jpg
And if you are from Aust you can get it from Virgin mobile here.
www.virginmobile.com.au
Hope that is enough proof for all the doubters
- Reply
- 2008-06-22 15:54
- vCK6
- R
- RMS
- Report
it is clearly mentioned in Q3 but god know from where these ppl are getting this mobile wothout telling us properly how the device work.
I guess that all these post are fake....
- Reply
- 2008-06-22 14:26
- SkEn
- R
- Chad
- Report
I got this phone today from Virgin mobile Aust. My first impression is that it feels & looks very cheap. I'm charging it up now & i'll let you guys know more of what i think later.
- Reply
- 2008-06-22 11:00
- vCK6
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to aatu @ 2008-06-21 15:42 from nxPYI wrote "build quality and style", but if u considering specs , see for Samsung i900, G810, F490, i550w, i560, L870 etc., etc. Best regards.
- Reply
- 2008-06-21 21:03
- iGfA
- R
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed