Nokia 6220 classic - user opinions and reviews
Voting results
- Design
-
8.3
- Features
-
8.5
- Performance
-
8.4
- Votes:
- 3875
- Hits:
- 802532
- boybawang
- Report
see the keypad.. i think that i will be hard to use specially the cancel button duuhhh
- Reply
- 2008-08-02 11:16
- PEGf
- U
- Kenzo
- Report
This phone is the female version of the n95....straight up......wat would a chik do with waFi......infrared...........coz thats the only solid spec thats mising ther wize its awsome......directed at ppl who think size maters.......:oP
- Reply
- 2008-08-01 14:10
- M@T2
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
IS the phone also available in purple as they show in the photos ? does it look good enough ?
- Reply
- 2008-08-01 14:07
- PW7H
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Has given everything but forgotten WI-FI!!!!!!!!!! DAMN!!!!
- Reply
- 2008-08-01 09:30
- w9Lg
- U
- MK.
- Report
solid fone with gr8 features...can anyone please temme wher icn get symbian 9.3 softwares really apreciate it thnx!!!
- Reply
- 2008-08-01 06:48
- PSdv
- Q
- Dave
- Report
You can't love this phone ahsan. It's just mine and only mine, no one can love this phone apart from me. So take your words back as I love this phone more than anything.
- Reply
- 2008-07-31 14:01
- mCSY
- R
- Ahsan
- Report
This phone is the best phone in the world. i am in love with it. AMAZING HMMM
- Reply
- 2008-07-31 12:43
- mCSY
- C
- Roy
- Report
Hello,
Does some body knows where I can download some software? Beacause I cant install the 0S9.1 & 9.2 software.
Thanks in advanced.
- Reply
- 2008-07-31 12:28
- nc0v
- Q
- carloud
- Report
dear sir aatu,
hmm by red light you mean something similar with nseries handsets right? when you record a video there is a red light that you cannot turn off? hehe the only reason why its put there is to let people know that they are being recorded and not for autofocusing purposes hehe
can you disable this redlight btw?
- Reply
- 2008-07-31 12:05
- vpY3
- Q
- aatu
- Report
> In reply to 6220 @ 2008-07-31 03:54 from w45PWell, there is one little red light when recording video, but I don't think it's meant to give light, but more likely something to do with auto focus or red eye reduction (maybe). So basically no video light at all.
I don't know how the normal digital video cameras (or even analog) handle the light, but it probably isn't Xenon.
I think Xenon is based on the idea that a relatively big amount of energy is used to give one short bright flash. As opposed to led, which is able to sustain one constant brightness for a long time with a smaller energy consumption, yet at the expense of illumination. But like I said earlier, the leds are most likely pretty useless even for video usage.
But I don't know this for sure, somebody can google or check wikipedia to make sure...
- Reply
- 2008-07-31 06:24
- nxPY
- R
- 6220
- Report
> In reply to aatu @ 2008-07-30 07:53 from nxPYHi! all
Is this phone use xenon light to record video OR not any light when record video?
and Have anyone try program "Ccam" is it work?
Thank you
- Reply
- 2008-07-31 03:54
- w45P
- R
- Fuzion
- Report
> In reply to [deleted post]It's here in the Philippines already. I've seen one in a Nokia Store and in an appliance store (Abensons)
Wasn't able to ask the price..
- Reply
- 2008-07-30 13:18
- vj1k
- R
- aatu
- Report
> In reply to dharmesh negandhi @ 2008-07-29 08:59 from uBZQIn case you still haven't googled it (and assuming you were seriously asking about it):
At the moment there are two mainstream solutions for mobilephone camera flashes:
1. LED light (over 90% use this)
2. Xenon flash (like the one used on real digital cameras)
Well, the Xenon in cameraphones isn't always as powerful as in normal digital cameras, but still wins against the leds 10-0.
The led has the advantage of also using it as a video light. But don't overestimate this as a feature... If you want good photos, then Xenon is worth it (unless you take photos ONLY in daylight, because then you don't need flash at all). Only downside is, at the moment it also seriously narrows down the options. Hopefully phone manufacturers will start to offer it more often in future models.
- Reply
- 2008-07-30 07:53
- nxPY
- R
- rajane
- Report
> In reply to aatu @ 2008-07-28 22:15 from nxPYbrother i owned one for a day and returned to the dealer due to some tech. faults in the phone if ur phone is good then enjoy............. i have seen the shutter cover had some problems and finally the poor plastic keys not fitted to the body properly and all those crap..... hated whole heartedly the one i bought and not urs
- Reply
- 2008-07-29 13:06
- 2TH1
- R
- rajoo
- Report
> In reply to aatu @ 2008-07-28 22:15 from nxPYThanks alot aatu for your relay
I already compare with My Nokia N82 with Nokia 6220c at Nokia Store the picture quality are same.
Only this phone lens cover is terrible because a bit harder to open but the phone function are really awesome(",)
Tomorrow going to buy this phone for my wife.
- Reply
- 2008-07-29 12:51
- 25KQ
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to blade @ 2008-07-28 14:38 from nXF9re. about the post, by blade.
what do you, mean by the propper successor to the nok 6233, and how long are you prepaired to wait, for the handset you want to come around the corner, in the future. 5 to 10 years time, if you want the verry best mobile handset tech has got to offer either now or in the future, the best choice for now in '08 has got to be nokia's n96!
- Reply
- 2008-07-29 10:21
- jJvQ
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to blade @ 2008-07-28 14:38 from nXF9re: to, he/she, who posted coment.
the mobile phone make, you're going, on about, has all ready, made several upgraded handset's, since then, the old defunct, 6233 (3g std only) with ever more newer handsets with built-in hsdpa 3.5g (3g+)aka turbo-charged, in the next few years or so, soon to be super turbo-charged, in the uk...
- Reply
- 2008-07-29 10:02
- jJvQ
- R
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed