nice phone, although it would of been a bonus if it included a secondary cam for video calling to enhance its 3g capabilities and a flash for the camera.
Top selling at Nokia was 6230 and 6230i ! The little genius son of them is 6233.They expect to sell a lot too . His target is not just business or fun , is for everibody !
son my exp on the field is older than ur self,
u dont have to insult ppl when u have no arguemetns to post, concantrate on the post not the poster...
and u r wrong again,
Nokia doesnt have, Nokia WILL have,
as always, u r the one thas has to learn the difference of announcing a phone and of actually lounch it, N92 isnt on the market,
u cant claim its superiority on TV feature as Samsung has already handsets working in korea and will probably lounch P900 sooner than N92, u r making the same mistakes again and again,
tha same mistakes u did on the superior and inovative N80 the only 3mp phone wich SE,Samsung couldnt chalenge...
when u make some mistakes u must have at least the courage to recognize them as a man,
maybe u will learn smth some day,
dont hide beside insults
i think it would be better if they put a secondary VGA camera for video call.. well..
stop bigging up SE and arrogantly feel proud of urself cuz there's no reason y u must by saying:
"SE,Samsung and Sharp will always be a step forward!"
SE = only QVGA screen with 256k colours
nokia = now has 352 x 416 screen res with 16 million colours plus WLAN, uPnP! nokia announced model/s with DVB-H TV already plus push to talk and EDGE are available way way back then and SE only had EDGE recently, is that what u call a STEP FORWARD! you gotta be kidding or i better say UR KIDDING! get ur facts right and stop fooling around with people bcoz apparently ur a NEWBIE in this mobile industry and perhaps better make ur homework rather than to slate brands with baseless, biased and arrogant comments, hahaha! you know that i showed u the way out in a SE forum of this website before so i think u should learn ur lessson now!
ladies & gentlemen, please not to compare the product between nokia and SE, its just like comparing Mercedes and BMW, each product had their own fans, so be nice.
Once again i was right
and all of you Nokia Fans were wrong,
i told you from the very beginning this is not going to compete K750,
it is a new phone with features on par with K750 but came in too late (even though was announced much earlier),
by the time Nokia will come up with a K750/D600 opponent, as the succesor of 6230i,
SE,Samsung and Sharp will always be a step forward!
Dont question me again without doing ur homework i m not a newbie at telecomunications and mobile fields...
The funny thing would be to see some Nokia fans after a while,
trying and convince others this phone is better than K800 because of this
and because of that
and some ppl from the middle east make some posts like,
"WOW this is the best phone ever made, thank u Nokia" etc etc...
It will be available approximately in the middle of May. The price will be circa 325 Euros.
High quality display but its pretty small.
"Only" 2" against Nokia 6280 2.2" display.
Nice features. High quality display. Unattractive design... SE k800 looks better & the camera, whoa! 3.2 MPx (cybershot) For sure it's exceptional! ^_^
I think 6233 will be at least as famous as the 6230 or 6230i.I can't wait to have one.Nokia always rulz! I'm from romania to and i have a 6230i to :) And i'm totally agree with u about the performances of this phone
I have one question: why everybody complain about the lack of autofocus, I have a 6230i and one of my friends have a w800i, there is almost any difference between the pictures. The only advantages of the SE are the flash and the battery life. And I'm looking at opinions that were posted at other phones and I see that everybody complain about the lack of a 3Mpx camera or the lack of autofocus, but they don't even have the money to buy these phones. Please post your opinion only if you own a phone, those people that have nothing to do at home are asked not to show all their stupidity everywhere. I hope to be understood, I'm from Romania. ;)
thats almost with every manufacturer dude,
there is really no distinction with 16bit and 18bit displays, and all those giants sell LESS THAN HALF than nokia. now nokia is pulling out better display than samgsung or sony in mobile phones now.
Nokia's history starts in 1865, when engineer Fredrik Idestam established a wood-pulp mill in southern Finland and started manufacturing paper.Later they some how came into electronics,even till todate they get their screens frm samsung main board from honkkong based firm and Cash their name just because being pioneer n mobiles.See their all phones most late to enter 265k and 2 MP without autofocus uptodate.SE has base of digital cameras strong presence as electronic giants and logical inventors.Even Sam r leader n electronics as TFTs screens other gadgets. Nokia has the MOST counter fiet products n market unchecked by the company.Distinction frm 65k to 265k is not apparent ad 1.3MP to 3Mp as in words.The public is getting awareness.Nokia get up from slumber to actually Deliver Thx
for Aparadectos, i nev beleive in ma life that though, nokia's huge sale's market 6233, 6230 or 6230i had ever became the market leader like SE's k700 or k750 u just live in diff place of the world