Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.1
- Features
-
8.2
- Performance
-
8.2
- GSM
- Report
- 0
This is a super phone . Is good in all . Move very fast , loks good , And the speakers are the greatest . No phone have more power speakers
- Reply
- 2008-09-28 20:42
- 0Uke
- U
- meow
- Report
- 0
> In reply to cloud @ 2008-06-12 18:06 from wwN4 - click to readmy nokia 6120 if far better than that nokia 6290 coz the 3g speed of mine is 3.5g while that is 3g only
- Reply
- 2008-08-08 15:24
- PSwb
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
But Nokia 6267 is the winner when it comes to video quality. High video speed and VGA recording in DVD quality is one of the beauty of Nokia 6267. Video resolution 640 x 480, Image resolution 1600 x 1200.
- Reply
- 2008-07-13 13:59
- 2App
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Hi to everybody!
Nokia 6267 is the genuine s40 version of Nokia 6290. Believe me I got this information from a review. The only difference is that the latter runs on symbian s60 while the former runs on s40 5th edition. Both phones have great sound quality! Both are highly efficient! Nokia 6267 has a beautiful look while Nokia 6290 has ugly look.
- Reply
- 2008-07-13 13:53
- 2App
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
yes you can dial using the front keys, but only for missed calls. You can view the miss calls, then press the left key to call them back.
- Reply
- 2008-05-13 09:33
- 5Dh1
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
can someone help ( sorry about my english ) can i use the buttons infront to dial a missed call without open the phone....thanks if someone aswer my question ?? :)
- Reply
- 2008-04-17 12:36
- m{jP
- U
- STELIOS
- Report
- 0
Hey everybody. i wanna buy a 2nd phone. and i ld love a flip one. However i live in france and there not alot stores in my city to visit. Anw i would like everybody's advise which flip cell phone is the best at the moment. Not only from the well know brands but from all over the world. Thank you..
- Reply
- 2008-04-08 18:30
- nAka
- U
- urr_qasdim
- Report
- 0
This phone is a gem! A true smartphone, it has the same version of the operating system as that in the E51 and it is almost as powerful. It took me several months to find a U.S. vendor (the phone itself came from Hong Kong) but it was well worth the wait. It has a very powerful browser (albeit no WiFi) and a host of built-in applications with many more downloadable - some free of charge. I added the Quickoffice extension ($30), enabling creating/editing Word, PowerPoint and Excel files and now I have a full-fledged Office capability. The main screen is bright and crisp, build quality is high (some complained about cheap plastic but I actually find the materials of high quality) and every port (incl. that for the microSD)is covered by a hinged door - a nice touch! Even the SIM card compartment has a hinged lock (similar to the one in the 6126).Bluetooth works flawlessly and syncing with the Nokia PC Suite is fast and trouble-free. The keyboard is comfortable thanks to the large keys and, overall, it is a pleasure using this phone. Nokia did a great job here - even though it is not an E- or N-Series product. I highly recommend this phone!
- Reply
- 2008-04-03 23:42
- Q@gv
- U
- Jane
- Report
- 0
which phone is better? nokia 6267 or nokia 6290....or which other type of flip phone is better?
- Reply
- 2008-03-28 03:25
- ijsp
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
the phone is bulky and has no WLAN but It performs well...
- Reply
- 2008-03-14 09:43
- vxgU
- U
- Tony Falcon
- Report
- 0
It's A Great Phone But the Cover Gets Dust in it Needs to Improve on That tHE Glass Also get Smeere I love this Phone
- Reply
- 2008-02-29 17:57
- GwM1
- U
- sweet_girl
- Report
- 0
I bought this phone and my first thought was "wow it's really big.." but i get used to it :) It's really really great phone! And it has everything :) and it's so fast.. Sound is great... camera is ok... i'm glad i bought it, i don't think you'll be dissapointed..
- Reply
- 2008-02-28 20:03
- 0kZ8
- U
- bubli
- Report
- 0
huury up tell me whic phone is better 6233 or 6290 i m waiting from the user response
- Reply
- 2008-02-23 06:19
- ubFL
- U

