Nokia 6301 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
6.8
- Features
-
6.6
- Performance
-
6.6
- Votes:
- 3820
- Hits:
- 1129043
- nEUrosceptic
- Report
1. For the love of God, kids, just try not to be so stupid and stop repeating posting the differences between 6300 & 6301, there are specifications for both of the above, anyone with the reading abilities can check them out.
2. Wi-Fi - fine, but why would we want it in a non-OS 6301, to surf the net with a xHTML browser??? Makes no sense at all.
No. 1 mobile company, try to be more creative, and stop underestimating your (potential) customers.
Thanks.
- Reply
- 2007-10-19 03:43
- M}Ns
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Very bad phone on the functional level. But its very good looking.
- Reply
- 2007-10-19 00:48
- m}JP
- U
- jayaram
- Report
6301 is wi-fi tecnology & nokia6300 is not a wi-fi technology
- Reply
- 2007-10-18 09:13
- vwsG
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
6300 was announced during November 2006 and 6301 during September 2007. Hmmm ... 10 months to inject Wi-Fi in the 6300 shell. Couple of points didn't mix very well -- tiny screen, poor battery-life, Wi-Fi, tiny keypad. The Nokia Bluetooth keyboard SU-8W might save be of help for the QWERTY. But battery-life would be a problem for maintaining both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth at a time. Should we consider using the Wi-Fi only when the phone is seeping power from the AC/DC charger/adapter?
All these very personal perceptions are based on the features published on GSMArena. No offense meant.
- Reply
- 2007-10-17 12:18
- 2SVg
- U
- yow
- Report
dang.. i shouldnt bought nokia 6300!?!
supposed to buy this one.
- Reply
- 2007-10-17 11:44
- ibfj
- U
- Fatih
- Report
Only one difference between 6300 and 6301 is wirless. 6301 has wireless..
- Reply
- 2007-10-17 00:28
- MqMG
- U
- Abhi
- Report
Nokia has gone crazy .. they r only increasing their portfoilio...n moreover surfing net on small screen does not make any sense....what i feel....
- Reply
- 2007-10-16 09:36
- 2WHE
- U
- Angel
- Report
THe difference?? the 6301 has wifi and a y3llow LED in both side but in 6300 the LED is blue and it has no wifi..
- Reply
- 2007-10-16 06:17
- vj1S
- U
- Tenda6
- Report
Looks like a silly idea; 2 grams heavier, 23 megabytes more internal memory & now Wi-fi included. The colouring doesn't look too nice either for a supposed upgrade
- Reply
- 2007-10-15 14:48
- Gfw8
- U
- girlxo03
- Report
hello everyone, can somebody told me the diference between nokia 6300 and 6301??? Please...
- Reply
- 2007-10-13 03:45
- P9I}
- U
- River
- Report
i read a lot of comments here against Nokia 6301. Though recently released, some comments goes on to say negative remarks even though they have not even got a hand on it! Mostly they only review the specs & image.
To these reviewers, have a life. "The right to be heard does not include the right to be taken seriously."
- Reply
- 2007-10-10 09:58
- nT3M
- U
- Frankie
- Report
i didn't like the 6300 too much but this one really is rubish.at least change the keypad or something.to produce a new phone just to add a wifi antenna is plain stupid.it's like with the 3310 and 3330.are we going backwords??
- Reply
- 2007-10-09 19:22
- pkYD
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed