Nokia 6555 - user opinions and reviews
Voting results
- Design
-
7.4
- Features
-
6.9
- Performance
-
6.9
- Votes:
- 1571
- Hits:
- 808975
- K.V.Subramanian
- Report
What's battery life like ? On the 6300 which also has 16M colours, it's nothing to write home about..and possibly the less said about 6131 the better
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 19:49
- PR@X
- U
- anike
- Report
its a question and i nid a quick rply,pls.
wats d camera specification
its awesome.kip workin on it
tnx
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 18:00
- Fvk9
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Looks like a copy of my Motorola W510! Only not as good!
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 17:52
- MSQ2
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
19.6mm thick. in this time and age, that's considered too thick. hope it was a typo error. anyway, i was expecting it to be 15 or below. so much for wishful thinking.
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 15:15
- PZtr
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
I have seen better but I do like the external display. But the handset seems a bit long, features are very standard, and 3G is useless without a video call camera. If the price is low, I think it will do well though.
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 13:00
- mse7
- U
- Aleli
- Report
Ok! I like how this phone looks. Finally a decent looking flip phone from Nokia. The only thing I don't like is the clock. hehehe. but maybe its just me.
The specs are decent too. I hope it comes out soon. Crossing my fingers.
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 12:44
- vpd}
- U
- sam
- Report
no, nokia and siemens havent merged. thats just a pretty baseless rumor. and FINALLY a razr shaped phone with a strong OS and a good battery life. I have always wanted to own a cell phone with this design, but motorola has always been a functional sacrifice for design, this though wouldnt be at all. and i hope its s40 so its fast. camera is probably the same 2.0 that they started from the n70-6233, its continued on to many models.
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 12:36
- PSdF
- U
- V-ger
- Report
wael! Don't want to be rude, but please have yourself and your source of information checked.
Nokia mobile phones will not be called Nokia Siemens. For one simple reason. Nokia mobiles and NSN are two independent companies (headcount, finance, design, development, etc.) It is one thing that the ownership owerlaps at the two companies.
You don't really think that Ericsson (Networks) are the same as Sony-Ericsson (Mobiles), do you? Or Siemens SMD machines have anything to do with their washing machine, or with Nokia Siemens Network?
As for Nokia mobiles, I think they should revise their naming structure. I keep loosing track based on what logic the numbers are assigned.
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 12:21
- MYk9
- U
- Myself
- Report
It looks like a downgraded version of 6267 with many features missing. Since 6267 is very good and cheap, why bother with this one ? The look, maybe....
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 11:14
- ijvU
- U
- wael
- Report
goodnews from 2008 the name of nokia mobiles will be "nokia siemens" this information came from nokia siemens network web site .
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 11:07
- Sd0s
- U
- james
- Report
its very good looking fone by nokia and nokia also improve his battery .wow nokia keep connecting people
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 09:33
- Rxfy
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
camea yes: loooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
i know why
becuase they didnt find yet how many pixels is it.before gsmarena post this phone wrote:we dont know yet the megapixels count or average...........
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 08:16
- MyGw
- U
- leo
- Report
Oh Come on!!
This is a 3G-enabled phone and yet Nokia has once again forgotted to include a secondary video camera for video call... just like what they did to their E65 model... sigh
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 07:42
- PINk
- U
- Harlekkin
- Report
Hmmm...
3G is nice, but I like my video-calls. No video-call camera?
Too bad...
Harlekkin
- Reply
- 2007-08-22 05:57
- PUa3
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed