Nokia 6600

Nokia

Check Price

Voting results

Design
7.8
Features
8.1
Performance
8.1
Votes:
18649
 Hits:
2125263

General 2G Network GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
Announced 2003, 4Q
Status Discontinued
Size Dimensions 109 x 58 x 24 mm, 113 cc
Weight 122 g
Display Type TFT, 65k colors
Size 176 x 208 pixels, 2.1 inches, 35 x 41 mm
 - 5-way joystick navigation
- Selectable themes
Sound Alert types Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, monophonic ringtones
Speakerphone Yes
Memory Phonebook Practically unlimited entries and fields, Photocall
Call records Detailed, max 30 days
Internal 6 MB
Card slot MMC, 32 MB card included, buy memory
 - 25 voice command slots
- Voice memo
Data GPRS Class 6 (3+1/2+2 slots), 24 - 36 kbps
HSCSD No
EDGE No
3G No
WLAN No
Bluetooth Yes, v1.1
Infrared port Yes
USB  
Camera Primary VGA, 640x480 pixels
Video Yes
Secondary No
Features OS Symbian OS v7.0s, Series 60 v2.0 UI
CPU ARM 9 104 MHz processor
Messaging SMS, MMS, Email
Browser WAP 2.0/xHTML
Radio No
Clock Yes
Alarm Yes
Games Yes, downloadable
Colors Light Gray
Languages Major Europe and Asia-Pacific
GPS No
Java Yes, MIDP 2.0
 - Mono audio player
- T9
Battery   Standard, Li-Ion 850 mAh (BL-5C)
Stand-by Up to 150 h - 240 h
Talk time Up to 2 h - 4 h

Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more

Nokia 6600 - user opinions and reviews

  • Anonymous

My thoughts exactly! I was just thinking what would my 6600 look like with a videocall camera on the front and a few more keys, I think it would still be an eye-turner. And with today's technology they could put an 8 megapixel camera in the back, the...

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-27 04:25
  • Mtr2
  • R
  • thepineapple1

if nokia was really smart.they would re-release famous phone.but make them up to date.keep the shape and design same.but just mold them to todays standard.ram/memody/camera/speakers/battery/scre­en/and OS.theres a reason why so many liked this phone.s...

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-26 21:01
  • SvBu
  • C
  • RAJA VEERWANI

lovely mobile

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-25 11:20
  • u1u0
  • C