Nokia 6600 fold - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Voting results

Design
7.0
Features
6.7
Performance
6.6
Votes:
726
 Hits:
350825

Pages: 1 234567

Lovely phone, but a pity that the camera is the old 2 MPx you find in all the low range Nokia, which give bad pictures

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-08 21:28
  • pyMS
  • U

> In reply to TyTN's son @ 2008-07-07 08:02 from M3WCHaha, you're right. Don't know how I got the Russian version...

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-07 19:57
  • jyrY
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-07-06 20:30 from YcjV
man, the link i posted is for the English version, there's no need to translate LOL

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-07 08:02
  • M3WC
  • R

Crap, I just came across the full review that was posted below (which is in Russian) with a FULL ENGLISH review (no translation... straight up English)


http://www.mobile-review.com/r...old-en.shtml

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-07 00:52
  • YcjV
  • U

And another video of the 6600 fold. This time, close-up views.

Man, I'm such a nerd.


http://youtube.com/watch?v=5364m8vKmBc

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-07 00:49
  • YcjV
  • U

Here's a video "review" of the phone, too. Not much of a review, but at least you can see the phone in motion:


http://www.techdigest.tv/2008/...rev_191.html

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-07 00:34
  • YcjV
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-04-29 13:02 from RGqFwell than get back to Alcatel!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dont you see on the Market that Nokia are the best mobile phones at the moment?

I think you should do some search before you post your sily oppinion

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-06 21:46
  • p7{{
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-06-03 08:33 from PEKRwell if you find it soo boring than do not read this site anymore!

I think is very handy indeed, before you buy something to hear all the oppinions about the product good or bad!

Very simple..

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-06 21:38
  • p7{{
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-07-06 20:30 from YcjVHi thank you very much for the link!
Was very helpful!

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-06 21:09
  • p7{{
  • R

> In reply to TyTN's son @ 2008-07-06 09:41 from M3WATranslated page of the review:

http://translate.google.ca/tra...=en&ie=UTF-8

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-06 20:30
  • YcjV
  • R

> In reply to TyTN's son @ 2008-07-06 09:41 from M3WAThanks for the link, TyTN!

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-06 20:20
  • YcjV
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-07-06 02:51 from mnG4
while we all wait for GsmArena's review, you can read one here:

http://www.mobile-review.com/r...old-en.shtml


  • Reply
  • 2008-07-06 09:41
  • M3WA
  • R

pleas Reviews this phone
thnx

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-06 02:51
  • mnG4
  • U

samsung g400 also thin but still equipped with sophisticated features.

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-03 18:39
  • ibc3
  • U

6600 fold promises a blend of elegant looks and modern features.

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-03 08:04
  • mnE0
  • C

You're wrong, look at the size of the phone.
There's not enough space to install/develop autofocus camera while the flip was so thin.

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-03 06:45
  • ib3i
  • C

I would buy it if the camera has autofocus.
Anything else - perfect(for me)

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-30 16:49
  • ib71
  • C

nokia should try to increase their mega pixil

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-30 15:09
  • TkdM
  • C

> In reply to Dianof @ 2008-06-20 23:40 from upqBNothing you said made any sense. It's perfect, but you don't like it?

Think before you speak, people.

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-30 03:56
  • jc3y
  • R

Looks nice and really small. Should sell well if not too expensive (200 euros max)

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-30 00:45
  • pyNY
  • U
Pages: 1 234567

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.