Nokia 6610

Nokia

Check Price

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
949575

Voting results

Design
7.1
Features
7.0
Performance
7.1
Votes:
34

General 2G Network GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
SIM Mini-SIM
Announced 2002, 3Q
Status Discontinued
Body Dimensions 106 x 45 x 17.5 mm, 71 cc (4.17 x 1.77 x 0.69 in)
Weight 84 g (2.96 oz)
Display Type CSTN, 4096 colors
Size 128 x 128 pixels, 5 lines, 1.5 inches (~121 ppi pixel density)
 - Four-way scroll
- Dynamic font size
Sound Alert types Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, monophonic ringtones
Loudspeaker Yes
3.5mm jack No
 - Ascending ringing tones
- Personal alert tones
Memory Card slot No
Phonebook 300 names x3 numbers
Call records 10 dialed, 10 received, 10 missed calls
 In shared memory:
- Phonebook
- 75 text messages
- 250 calendar notes
- 6 Java apps, 64 kB each
- 35 images
Data GPRS Class 6 (3+1/2+2 slots), 24 - 36 kbps
EDGE No
WLAN No
Bluetooth No
Infrared port Yes
USB  
Camera   No
Features Messaging SMS, MMS
Browser WAP 1.2.1
Radio Stereo FM radio
Clock Yes
Alarm Yes
Games 2 - Bounce and Puzzle Chess + Java downloadable
GPS No
Java Yes
Colors 3 - Black, White, Grey
 - Predictive text input
- Organizer
- Infrared transfer of data between compatible phones
- Xpress-on covers
- Profiles
Battery   Li-Ion 780 mAh battery (BLD-3)
Stand-by 150 h - 300 h
Talk time 2 h - 5 h
Misc SAR EU 0.63 W/kg (head)    

Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more

Nokia 6610 - user opinions and reviews

  • Elibom

I tried this phone for some few years ago, but I found it too plastic, with bad and difficult buttons. And not AT ALL as good radio as, for example, Nokia 2300 (6610 has worse radio audio, slow radio FM channel changing, and so on). The standby tim...

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-26 21:08
  • HAuc
  • U
  • Masood Mustufa

I used it 8 years back, it was very good phone of that time :) Regards, m@s00d

  • Reply
  • 2014-03-06 08:40
  • 6Qax
  • H
  • RAKA

It is too better to throw in dustbin and keep going to an age.

  • Reply
  • 2014-02-11 12:26
  • 2Wa@
  • R