Nokia 7210

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
0.3%
Total hits:
677882

Voting results

Design
8.3
Features
8.1
Performance
8.2
Votes:
5898

General 2G Network GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
Announced 2002
Status Discontinued
Size Dimensions 106 x 45 x 17.5 mm, 83 cc
Weight 83 g
Display Type CSTN, 4096 colors
Size 128 x 128 pixels, 1.5 inches
 - Dynamic font size
- Softkey
Sound Alert types Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, monophonic ringtones
Speakerphone No
 - Ascending ringing tones
- Personal alert tones
Memory Phonebook 500 names x3 numbers
Call records 10 dialed, 10 received, 10 missed calls
Card slot No
 - 3 phone numbers per name
- 150 text messages
- 100-250 calendar notes
Data GPRS Class 6 (3+1/2+2 slots), 24 - 36 kbps
HSCSD Yes, 43.2 kbps
EDGE No
3G No
WLAN No
Bluetooth No
Infrared port Yes
USB Yes, Pop-Port
Camera   No
Features Messaging SMS, MMS
Browser WAP 1.2.1
Radio Stereo FM radio
Clock Yes
Alarm Yes
Games 2 preinstalled, More via WAP
Colors 3 - Turquoise, Orange, and Brown
Languages Country dependant
GPS No
Java Yes
 - T9
- Organizer
- Infrared transfer of data between compatible phones
- Xpress-on covers
- Profiles
Battery   Standard, Li-Ion 780 mAh (BLD-3)
Stand-by up to 10 days
Talk time up to 4 h

Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more

Nokia 7210 - user opinions and reviews

  • dupe

no camera but cool and it serves !!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-25 09:05
  • fuLi
  • C
  • Dolphin

This is by far the best phone Nokia has ever made..I have used it for 6 years still not a zinch of a prob..have all the original colour covers and believe me, every time i take it out of my pouch everyone jst turns and luks..it an awesome phone..spec...

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-26 18:34
  • w9Lf
  • H
  • donat

This is a ugly phone from Nokia. The key board is really ugly!Mybe the Nokias designer wont to create one original form to fit, but in my opinion this is not works.The other technical data i have not a skill.Im sure that is a good mobile phone, just ...

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-05 16:56
  • pk%4
  • U