Nokia 7210

Nokia

Voting results

Design
8.3
Features
8.1
Performance
8.2
Votes:
5874
 Hits:
664321

General 2G Network GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
Announced 2002
Status Discontinued
Size Dimensions 106 x 45 x 17.5 mm, 83 cc
Weight 83 g
Display Type CSTN, 4096 colors
Size 128 x 128 pixels, 1.5 inches
 - Dynamic font size
- Softkey
Sound Alert types Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, monophonic ringtones
Speakerphone No
 - Ascending ringing tones
- Personal alert tones
Memory Phonebook 500 names x3 numbers
Call records 10 dialed, 10 received, 10 missed calls
Card slot No
 - 3 phone numbers per name
- 150 text messages
- 100-250 calendar notes
Data GPRS Class 6 (3+1/2+2 slots), 24 - 36 kbps
HSCSD Yes, 43.2 kbps
EDGE No
3G No
WLAN No
Bluetooth No
Infrared port Yes
USB Yes, Pop-Port
Camera   No
Features Messaging SMS, MMS
Browser WAP 1.2.1
Radio Stereo FM radio
Clock Yes
Alarm Yes
Games 2 preinstalled, More via WAP
Colors 3 - Turquoise, Orange, and Brown
Languages Country dependant
GPS No
Java Yes
 - T9
- Organizer
- Infrared transfer of data between compatible phones
- Xpress-on covers
- Profiles
Battery   Standard, Li-Ion 780 mAh (BLD-3)
Stand-by up to 10 days
Talk time up to 4 h

Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more

Nokia 7210 - user opinions and reviews

  • Ashish

the most amazing phone nokia has ever made this is the best phone awsum battery backup ausum standby it is just amazing ...it even beats any mordern phone atleast for me i have it from last 5 years and jsut amazing

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-25 17:09
  • 2S{L
  • U
  • missing the 7210

how i miss this phone. we went island hopping in '02, dropped it in the water near the beach one time, scooped it up, guess what? it still worked fine after drying it. was in the middle of a storm last '04, the got wet in my shirt pocket,...

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-04 09:15
  • i4P%
  • U
  • Anonymous

absolutely agree with u..nokia should stick to the old designs and incorporate those new features rather than become a follower

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-30 11:24
  • wHTe
  • R