Nokia 7210

Nokia

Voting results

Design
8.3
Features
8.1
Performance
8.2
Votes:
5819
 Hits:
621413

General 2G Network GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
Announced 2002
Status Discontinued
Size Dimensions 106 x 45 x 17.5 mm, 83 cc
Weight 83 g
Display Type CSTN, 4096 colors
Size 128 x 128 pixels
 - Dynamic font size
- Softkey
Ringtones Type Polyphonic (4 channels), monophonic
Amount 20 + 15 polyphonic
Customization Download, order now
Vibration Yes
 - Ascending ringing tones
- Personal alert tones
Memory Phonebook 500 names x3 numbers
Call records 10 dialed, 10 received, 10 missed calls
Card slot No
 - 3 phone numbers per name
- 150 text messages
- 100-250 calendar notes
Data GPRS Class 6 (3+1/2+2 slots), 24 - 36 kbps
HSCSD Yes, 43.2 kbps
EDGE No
3G No
WLAN No
Bluetooth No
Infrared port Yes
USB Yes, Pop-Port
Features Messaging SMS, MMS
Browser WAP 1.2.1
Clock Yes
Alarm Yes
Games 2 preinstalled, More via WAP, order now
Colors 3 - Turquoise, Orange, and Brown
Languages Country dependant
Camera No
 - Downloadable Java applications
- FM radio (stereo)
- T9
- Calculator
- Calendar
- Infrared transfer of data between compatible phones
- Xpress-on covers
- Profiles
Battery   Standard, Li-Ion 780 mAh (BLD-3)
Stand-by up to 10 days
Talk time up to 4 h

Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more

Nokia 7210 - user opinions and reviews

  • tittu

mine went to the swimming pool. two days later he was back in its best, until he fell from a bus in the middle of a highway and i never saw it again.. one of the best phones ever made.

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-09 04:47
  • mnjd
  • R
  • may

i hv been using this phone since it launched. and now it's 2008 it served me rally long n reliable. of coz comparing to the "new " phones now it has less features but i would high recommand it to ppl who just wan the basics.up til today. i'm still us...

  • Reply
  • 2008-05-06 09:33
  • TS$p
  • U
  • sexy ******girl

I think this cell phone looks like a picece of nothing so If I was you I would not buy it it looks ugly EEEEEEEE!!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 03:00
  • 47ZW
  • U