Nokia 7250 - user opinions and reviews
Voting results
- Design
-
7.9
- Features
-
8.0
- Performance
-
8.0
- Votes:
- 2883
- Hits:
- 412132
- nicole
- Report
i want to know how to recieve picture messeges on my phone because when someone trys to send one to me it said i have to look at it through the internet..Thanks nicole
- Reply
- 2005-01-20 11:02
- RNIX
- U
- sungnarith
- Report
my phone is nokia 7210 i want to know about how to use with computer and want to khnow some problem with this phone
- Reply
- 2005-01-04 08:07
- PWag
- U
- MUnited
- Report
don't worry about this phone.it is already behind the times. Another phones have better standby times, talk times, camera modes. Nokia 7250i came after their flagship 7250. This phone is old, lacking in technology. If you wanted it, you should of bought it before, just when it came out. it is not worth buying this phone now.
- Reply
- 2004-12-06 07:44
- U
- andi4u2c@yahoo.com
- Report
i'd like to get a site where i can personally purchase my own nokia 7250 because the phone is a lovely one anybody can think of buying,i've shown alot of interest in phone,thats why am sending this message.
- Reply
- 2004-12-02 17:30
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
y complain if nokia releases a new fone after you buy it, this is common sense when you buy a fone straight away the new version of the fone will be released after this or at the same time, read press releases and the best time to buy a fone is 4-5 months after the original relese eg by a fone realsed in nov in feb the next year or earlier, you may save a couple of hundred dollars and also get better revision software, yes 7210 does not have a camera, but it is also SMALLER THAN A 7250 they made it smaller with out puttin a camera in it, a 7250 is bigger and is the top-range fone at the time this fone was made, other companys at the same time 6 months LATER introduced much better fones eg t610 which kick this fones ass so you have to think this fone has 6 months less of technology in it. do not complain for that, also the fone looks good i think thats the only reason y it sold so well, it shouldnt be so expensive though i dont see wat the hype is the fone costs at cost price $150 AU and is sold at $6-800 rrp
- Reply
- 2004-12-01 10:21
- U
- naeem
- Report
aslamo alokum your mobile is pic camera very bad samsung display picture is very very good
- Reply
- 2004-11-13 20:39
- U
- Joe
- Report
This fone is better than N3200 because of higher space capacity for java games and photo savings.
- Reply
- 2004-11-05 09:39
- U
- Sheeban M.Arif
- Report
Nokia 7250 good fone but wit a very bad camera clearity.Its a nice fone with a huge memory nice fm radio,good in looking very flexi n handy.but just 1 weak point camera.
- Reply
- 2004-10-12 17:21
- U
- Ibrahim Coca
- Report
It is the most easily phone to repesr and hold in this world.This make people to like it, use it comonly especialy in Nigeria i am.
- Reply
- 2004-10-03 06:22
- U
- levoj
- Report
if i were u dont buy this damn fone!nokia jaz fooling people!!they made this 7250 with poor resolution then they cam up with 7250i with a night mode but still it has a poor resolution.....
- Reply
- 2004-09-28 10:53
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
4 all those whu said:"we dun nd a gd camera since dis a fone , go get a camera if u want a gd picture"... i wood say ... STOP LIVING UR LIFE IN IGNORANCE!!! if other fones from other brands can do a gd job on de camera ... y can`t dis model do de same? dey earn money based on YOUR IGNORANCE... think ... izzit worth it? I m surprised dis fone even got a ratin above 5 ... dat is ... hilarious... go get other models or get 1 without de camera at all ... don`t get a camera fone wif a lousy camera... what for?
- Reply
- 2004-09-11 12:00
- U
- Victor Basu
- Report
Hi! Everyone.
I am in the process for buying a new phone,but am very confused to which one to buy.I have got 3phones in my mind i.e NOKIA 7250i,SonyEricsson T630 or SAMSUNG X600.
Of all these the SAMSUNG X600 beats both NOKIA as well as SonyEricsson in Camera+Picture Quality,the memory is too large i.e almost 10MB,it has infrared too.
The only advantage that NOKIA has is it has a Stereo FM,that keeps on hooked in to fab music whenever & whereever we r on the move.SE T230 has a good battery life,atleast better than both SAMSUNG & NOKIA.Another part where NOKIA is defeated by SAMSUNG & SE are the colours,i.e both SAMSUNG & SE are 65,000 colour enabled where as NOKIA is just 4096,which compared to SAMSUNG and SE is nothing near.
PLS some one advice me what to buy as all these phones come in almost the same cost range.
Regards,
VB
- Reply
- 2004-09-04 13:57
- U
- Mohtashim
- Report
it's gr8 to use light weight slim smart and decent . i like 7250 and so i have it
- Reply
- 2004-07-27 11:01
- U
- amith
- Report
hai i have purchased new 7250.can any one tell me how to download photo from mobile to computer .plz
- Reply
- 2004-07-11 14:20
- U
- lawrence zormelo
- Report
I think it is very fantastic and interesting. Pleease can i know the price range?
- Reply
- 2004-06-30 11:41
- U
- skater42
- Report
As said so many times before, NOKIA sucks. Of course I got my reasons. The quality could be much better, and the amount of phones NOKIA produce, and the relatively non-existing changes that they make to new models is just bugging the hell out of me. To stay competetive one has to be better than the rest. So far Asian manufacturers beat the rest of the Euro/American market. LG, Samsung, Innostream and KTF (Korean Networks only) are working with 270K Screens. And NOKIA just brought out new models FINALLY with a 65K screen (which is high-standard for them now).
If you look at the LG menu of the G7020 and the G7100 it beats NOKIA by miles. Just as easy to navigate, better looking!
Ok, yall think about NOKIA. My first choice in Phone would be the LG 7100 or Innostream 90!
cheers yall
- Reply
- 2004-06-01 06:31
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed