Nokia 8800 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
7.9
- Features
-
7.2
- Performance
-
7.2
- Votes:
- 10870
- Hits:
- 2070333
- avalanche
- Report
can someone tell me if people who are selling 8800 on ebay are scammers? or they really have the phone ?
thanks
- Reply
- 2005-04-24 00:12
- jQ1I
- U
- Emil
- Report
actually .. the best looking phones were the 8890 and 8910 (color - unfortunately a two-band). Nokia wants a bigger screen, even on their top of the line phones. Really curious how much this is going to cost whether is't in Europe or here in the states. I'm buying mine in Europe .. but for those who are awaiting its release in the states .. it's probably going to be Cingular who will have it .. T Mobile got on the low end of the stick when it comes to high-end phones.
- Reply
- 2005-04-23 21:12
- 4q{B
- U
- sajid hamid
- Report
This is the real style phone with high quality and this is got good feature so i am sure this nokia will make good impression.in the people
- Reply
- 2005-04-23 19:37
- mrZb
- U
- Nokia 8810
- Report
you can't compare LOWER CLASS nokia phone with this 8 Series nokia 8800 MASTERPIECE.. too FAR!!
- Reply
- 2005-04-23 09:11
- Y13}
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
No one should compare this 8800 with the V3. This phone is in a totally much higher "CLASS"!!
My V3 is a crappy, lazy moving BIG phone......This 8800 is a delicate & precision tool!!
- Reply
- 2005-04-22 18:43
- P%G5
- U
- J.Rangelov Bulgaria
- Report
I have Nokia 6230.8800 It's not bad but.I thing That Nokia 6230i it's better choice.
- Reply
- 2005-04-22 12:09
- m{4N
- U
- PhOeNiX
- Report
Is this supose to be sold when a Motorola V3 is for sale in the shop in front? For those who can wait, the Motorola V1150 is for soon...
- Reply
- 2005-04-22 09:31
- PDJ7
- U
- Chris
- Report
The best looking phone was the 8850. Shame that Nokia doesnt put in a color screen and GPRS
- Reply
- 2005-04-22 00:05
- MXsP
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
I suspect the guy below used to work for Nokia.....but then got fired!!!
- Reply
- 2005-04-21 04:21
- P%G5
- U
- juan pablo sanchez a
- Report
i just want to now when i can get this product, becouse i am in mexico city?
- Reply
- 2005-04-21 03:21
- PqFp
- U
- a sense of perspecti
- Report
hats off to Nokia ..well done ! what a great looking phone.
i am due an upgrade in 2 months time and this phone has shot straight to the top of my list.
cant wait
a note to all the people moaning about a supposed 'lack of features", get a grip,it has everything you could want|: bluetooth(a lack of this stopped me buying its predesor) , video record and playback and a camera. granted it hasnt the largest amount of megapixels etc,or a huge memory but who really cares..the fact is that it does all the basics with a few luxurys thrown in too. i dont need my phone to have mp3,as i have an i-pod. i dont need a portable computer-i have my laptop.i dont need amazing quality photos or video-i have my digital camera....what i need is a sylish, well built, EXCLUSIVE mobile phone which will make the right impression in the business world....this phone is pitched at just the right level for us customers who will actually be buying the phone , as opposed to just talking about it and picking faults in forums such as this !
- Reply
- 2005-04-20 23:29
- mXuy
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Can someone tell why the battery is 600 mAh only? The standby & talk time seem short compare to other Nokia phones!
- Reply
- 2005-04-20 17:53
- P%G5
- U
- LeXuS
- Report
Cool Slide. The slider is equipped with an automatic finishing mechanism clicking when closed.
- Reply
- 2005-04-20 16:25
- ntWa
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
This is a beautiful phone for beautiful looking people only.
- Reply
- 2005-04-20 09:27
- P%G5
- U
- THE GAME HHHH
- Report
i hate this ugly heavy phone this is not better than motorola v3 coz v3 is light in weight looks good stylish but one bad thing about v3 is camera is vga but phones is for calling , sms , mms , not for taking pictures , if u want take pics so buy camera hahahahahah bye please tell me v3 is better or nokia 6680 bye tell me other wise i will give u a pedigree .
- Reply
- 2005-04-19 20:30
- PDLV
- U
- discerning customer
- Report
The phone follows the 8910 which I bought because it was "titanium tough" and for the style. I gave up several important telephone features, however. Amongst these were : tri-band, speakerphone, decent internal memory, a backlit keyboard. While the titanium was tough on the 8910, the slide mechanism has given out after only 2 years. This is why I am hunting for a new phone. Nokia's non-candy bar phones are of such poor design that I considered going back to motorola, a brand I had previously thought to abandon forever because of their memo system.
Nokia, how hard can it be to come up with a flip phone that is solid? If you took the 8800, and substituted the slide for a strong flip cover over the keypad you'd have a great flip phone to add to the weak line-up non-candybar models. You could eliminate some size and weight as well.
The 8800 is a great addition to Nokia's weak model lineup. Some of the telephone features lacking in the 8910 are present in the 8800/8801, however, I wonder if the sliding mechanism has been made stronger. Also, voice dialing and a backlit keypad are basic phone features which would add more value than a camera. The phone is heavier that any of the phones with which I compared it (motorola, samsung, other nokias).
With this model Nokia has made great progress in the top of its line, but it still lacks a robust flip phone. In a sense, it has exceeded my expectations without meeting them.
Dissappointed in Denver.
- Reply
- 2005-04-19 18:51
- Mm2N
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed