Nokia Lumia 800 review: New beginnings
Nokia N9 review: Once in a lifetimeNokia 8800 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.9
- Features
-
7.2
- Performance
-
7.2
- ^_^x
- Report
- 0
To Wealthy-I don't care if this comes from the moon or from Mars for that matter. All I said was that I thought the V3 is better than this phone. That's just my opinion...it doesn't mean you have to follow it...and quite honestly, I'd also rather have a Ferrari than a Corvette but in this case, I'd take the Moto over this Nokia, thank you very much! And you have no right to call me stupid or anything! And you have the gall to gall me naive?
- Reply
- 2005-04-09 18:16
- R5vQ
- U
- mp
- Report
- 0
they just could have put the price of 3000euros, there would be still people to buy it, but not with these features!!
every luzer can afford 300euro for a phone if he want's to be cool!
they should have put 2_3MPX camera and everything affordable only for rich, not like this
- Reply
- 2005-04-09 16:20
- Mtrf
- U
- Japunlock
- Report
- 0
its the ugliest phone ever and it is also unpractical svga camera with 800x600 sounds really ridiculous for that generation of phones
- Reply
- 2005-04-09 16:11
- QC8p
- U
- dude
- Report
- 0
it may be ugly and not as functional as many other (cheaper) phones but the main reason really is for image. if u can afford it - it says a lot about how heavy that wallet of urs really is! who cares if it's ugly..as long as u're rich enuf to have one u rule!
- Reply
- 2005-04-09 13:05
- PEpC
- U
- nokia fan
- Report
- 0
hey guys... although i am an nokia user, i must admit that that phone design and dimension is getting bigger and bigger. i must say they are not improving but going downwards! BULK UP NOKIA!
- Reply
- 2005-04-09 10:41
- F4pr
- U
- lucky
- Report
- 0
Nokia are still way behind. other phone models have 2 mega pixel phones out already & are better in video quality too & style & features. This phones only got style & crap features, SVGA? WTF!
- Reply
- 2005-04-09 10:28
- mypA
- U
- Nokiauser
- Report
- 0
Seriously, this is a lousy phone. Just studied the features. If you wan to classify this as premimum phone, look ALONE is not enough. YOU NEED TO HAVE QUALITY. Please try to improve. Look at your competitors, NOKIA, their technology is better. (If you don't have SYMBIAN OS phone, u are just nothing)
- Reply
- 2005-04-09 09:57
- PFM9
- U
- sunny
- Report
- 0
nokia has gone bonkers why else in todays time would they build such a huge handset
- Reply
- 2005-04-09 03:58
- PWY$
- U
- ali.k
- Report
- 0
i think its going to be a great phone but in 300$ range of price not more than that!
with the price indicated by nokia i dont think so!
- Reply
- 2005-04-09 02:14
- 4YS0
- U
- egunes
- Report
- 0
above all , the specification of such prestigious mobile is second plan..nokia brand is not revealing a new mobile everyday like its rival !...good phone, quality materials
- Reply
- 2005-04-08 23:18
- np9G
- U
- Butzu
- Report
- 0
Mr. Cristopher Reeve : 8919i even now cost a lot of money and thats why I said 8800 it will cost even more . Compare price between 8910i and 9210i.Thx.
- Reply
- 2005-04-08 22:07
- ntN1
- U
- brev
- Report
- 0
which silly prirock would pick the V3 over the 8800 better looking phone all round the v3 is the crappy v600 but flat n they say nika just rename old phones
- Reply
- 2005-04-08 20:46
- iIR0
- U
- WEALTHY
- Report
- 0
To ^_^x ,
Hey man, you do sound stupid & naive. Go & get yourself a V3 & shut up. This Nokia phone is an European product......delicate stuff......very unlike V3 from the USA.
( I rather own an European Ferrari or Lamborghini than an American Corvette or Mustang.......and this also apply to other things including mobile phones!!! GET MY MESSAGE?????
* This beautiful NOKIA 8800 is going to be my next dream phone.
- Reply
- 2005-04-08 19:22
- TCXv
- U
- ^_^x
- Report
- 0
I said nothing about Nokia imitating Motorola and the V3...what I meant was that Nokia is releasing this because they saw that Motorola was succesful with the V3, and as a reaction to that, they made this phone.
- Reply
- 2005-04-08 19:03
- R5vS
- U
- dxreaper
- Report
- 0
To all of you who are saying:
The main purpose of a phone is to communicate, this is what the 8800 is.
Sure, communicate for 3 hours and you're without a phone, but a heavy paper weight for the rest of the day.
What's with the weight? What's with the chrome stainless steel finish? Finger prints all around, not to mention scratches. What's with the terrible battery life? What's with the extremely high price?
- Reply
- 2005-04-08 17:34
- Ui0x
- U
