Nokia 8800 Sapphire Arte - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

so, if we get the replica ones, is it that good? i guess it would look like plastic. people will know its a replica even if they're a mile away. right?

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-17 20:29
  • kWPw
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-03-03 06:48 from 436tyes, but apparently the replica ones look exactly like the 8800 arte and it weighs the same and is quadband but it does not have wifi =( the site is http//www.slashedpricetag.com

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-17 13:55
  • jT3$
  • R

This phone has a very big price. Not for it's functionality but for the materials used. They dont just give a price to a phone like that. They calculate how much it cost them for the material and such. This phone was given a normal functionality but spectacular looks. I would get this phone, If I have the money lol. It has scratch free material, Smooth slide, soft keypad & colour. The functions only AUD$200 materials AUD$1500.

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-17 09:13
  • vCEp
  • U

stupid phone..it.s about 730euros, and it can do nothing..and it.s so ugly. 4 only 400euros i can buy a nok n95 8GB(symbian,3.5G,wifi, FPU,..) wich is far better than 8800 arte saphire..simply...it doesn.t compare with my n82(symbian,3.5G,wifi, FPU,..) !!

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-16 15:15
  • iKDU
  • U

all the troubles are understandable as this phone is sheer elegance and nothing else

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-13 11:54
  • Pxxd
  • U

For those of you considering owning the Arte!!

Forget functionality!! Forget versitility!!
This mobile is all about style and wealth. There's nothing like placing it on a table to anounce your presence. Everyone will want to pick it up whilst putting theirs away, never to be seen again in public!! The green eyed coments will begin to flow,'It's too expensive', 'The cameras no good', there's no radio', 'It's so heavy'............
The truth is, it's stylish and shouts sophistication. It says you care how you look and how people percieve you.
Your willing to pay that bit extra to be set apart from the crowd, the also rans!!
I've just got mine, in fact I have all the 8800's.They are the dress mobile, champagne in one hand arte in the other.
Everyone else.... has Lager!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-12 21:49
  • SpGK
  • H

a very expensive phone from nokia..

a phone for a chosen few and the lucky ones.. for the born rich, or became rich people only c",

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-10 18:48
  • PT}E
  • U

two months down the line and the software blew out on me. its never happened on the cheaper nokia's i have used all my life. when i sent it to the nokia priority dealer they said it would take 15 days to repair so i mean why do we pay so much if nokia cant provide quick service for their premiums phones. its just a sexy looking phone, not as reliable as the brand image suggests it should be.

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-08 16:44
  • vGax
  • U

The camera color is too 'red'...and so the picture outcome very un-natural!

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-08 15:32
  • TR{k
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-07-01 21:05 from M{3Pi had the ascent ti as well, but i love my sapphire arte much more than my ti. Whis phone is much better than the ti. And even much better than my vertu nurburgring edition. However, i am having problem with my arte's camera. Maybe because this is te first version for the software used in arte.

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-06 08:01
  • Ya7P
  • R

I used this phone for two weeks i really liked it but then i got the Vertu Ascent Ti and the Ti is way better this phone this phone is okay but i would still prefer the Ti over it more luxurious

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-01 21:05
  • M{3P
  • H

is the saphire in the middle real?? if not why is it worth £1000??? xx

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-01 20:46
  • MF{P
  • Q

Sure eye catcher in bar
n95 will make u look like a geek but this will make u look like superstar..sure it catch more chicks...

nway this phone its for LOOKS not for its FUNCTIONS

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-30 05:40
  • PIAp
  • C

this mobile is really stupid.500-1000 euros I have to give for this junk??!!hello,are u normal??It's ugly,stupid but only positive thing is 1GB memory!!please post my comment and I hope that I didn't make a mistake about this cellphone!!kiss

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-29 17:36
  • 0v@9
  • U

you stupid people, why don't you understand the diference between a luxury phone and a multimedia phone? you don't have how to compare those 2 classes of mobile gsm,don`t you see?? the price of n95 is going down badly , but the luxury one decreas much harder!!! a nokia 8800 classic it`s steel 300 eur after 3 ears, i wonder how much a nokia n95 will be after this time!!! best regard!

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-28 13:43
  • 3cj0
  • C

> In reply to jakontil @ 2008-06-26 08:35 from w7hRfor those ppl who are using such premium phone, you think they will care what function the phone has got? think wat they really want are only the look. where got time to VIDEO CALL?

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-26 14:32
  • F4ps
  • R

> In reply to BAD BOX @ 2008-06-24 22:10 from 04VGthey should have implemented a video call ability, at least

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-26 08:35
  • w7hR
  • R

you all guys go to hell.you all do'nt know the actual value of this mobile.if you want only mobile then this is that one but if you want the specification like:(camera,video recorder etc)so you better buy these things instead of mobile.do not mind what i said.

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-24 22:10
  • 04VG
  • C

whats the point of this mobile costing so much? i mean...if its supposed to be nice, it really isnt plus it doesnt have as much features, so whats the fuss about this mobile? i dont know :/

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-24 11:02
  • nvxc
  • U

Its beautiful but i prefer the n95 nokia because have more and more specifications, lol i love the n95 phone!

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-22 21:21
  • iBtv
  • R

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.