Nokia 9300i - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Voting results

Design
7.5
Features
7.5
Performance
7.5
Votes:
3182
 Hits:
938639

Communicators have always been good. But they are very bulky. They can do a lot but this one has no camera. Keyboard is good on a phone but who uses it that much anyway?

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-24 07:19
  • 4TSp
  • U

No Camera And All The Functions..Expensives..

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-23 18:54
  • F4pr
  • U

Hey NOKIA... don't play with your customer...

You bring out one model and later you give very small improvement like putting WiFi and you sell as a new version with same price...

Have you consider for those who had bought the previous version ?

Have you do market research before you bring out new product ?

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-23 08:24
  • PUx{
  • U

Yup agree that Nokia needs to wake up... Had a 6210 that was their best phone

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-22 11:30
  • PWYU
  • U

Lacks vibrator too

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-21 06:43
  • PWYU
  • U

Definately cool! The only thing it lacks is the camera! First Communicator with Predictive TEXT!! :)

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-20 12:40
  • PAmA
  • U

P910 is an fashion phone mate. What P910 can do? can only view office application, not even editing.

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-19 01:32
  • PPDB
  • U

No-camera phone with pda functions are a rare
thing. Cause if you in high-security places no camera-phones are not allowed. Only disappointment is still vibration, you will definitely lose your business deals if you keep missing calls. Just great a business phone that makes you lose business.

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-18 04:08
  • PFMY
  • U

thought there would be a better camera

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-18 00:28
  • MSRn
  • U

9300i has wlan version g...that means you have 44 mbs speed transfer,not b.vistit nokia's website to check it out.full business phone=no camera,so dont complain about it any more!!

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-17 19:23
  • mYY{
  • U

Actually, i was expecting to see a camera in the upgrade,

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-17 08:45
  • M{3P
  • U

smartphone with Symbian ? crapbag ! the truth is in the windows smart phone ! x5 faster .

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-16 17:42
  • Tm%1
  • U

kesarya
The Sony Ericsson p910 is better than the 9500. I-Mate Jasjsr is better but costs a arm and a leg

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-16 13:34
  • TRY2
  • U

ya... But the changes in nokia 9300i has not been up to my standard u see.. So i think that sooner or later, nokia will produce the 9500i, which i think should be the best, if the changes is acceptable :)

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-16 13:17
  • inZ7
  • U

I don't think its time to replace 9500. I am happy with my 9500 communicator. Has anyone heard of something better than 9500 in the market? Pls. do let me know..

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-15 16:19
  • S1xe
  • U

With a megapixel cam 9300i would compete head-on with 9500. Guess Nokia does not want that to happen, so no cam on this baby. Lack of vib a pointless oversight though. A Cool communicator nonetheless.

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-15 10:41
  • Ssnj
  • U

The first time I see this 9300i, I was so FASCINATED! but after looking thru again at the features.. I was let down bcuzthere is no camera!!! but Im ok wif the function of no vibration.. Thats wad I call business phone (a phone with no vibration). All the functions are acceptable to me, except tt very camera!!! where is the camera??? and I was satisfied with the capabilities to connect wirelessly.. Soo... i think I will have to wait for another communicator tt have the functions I need... (probably 9500i? :P)

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-15 08:10
  • inZ7
  • U

Theres nothing different. Also it cant vibate :| Can the 9300 vibrate though... :p

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-12 20:55
  • PGhD
  • U

Well, Most people regard this as Business Class Phone but it doesnt even have a Feature of Vibration not even in this 9300i wonder what this upgrade is for.. Vibration is Required if one is in a meeting or elsewhere I have 9500 and I Miss that Feature

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-12 10:08
  • ijMy
  • U

Crappy upgrade to a substandard phone

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-12 08:11
  • PWYU
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.