this is a good phone not the best. because only one good feature that is added to this phone is IEEE 802.11g or wireless g. when nokia emailed me about this phone i thought this phone is even better than the 9500. i thought it has a at least mp camera, decent music player and higher version of symbian os. maybe ill stick to my 7710 for a while and wait for the much better and powerfull nokia phone.
this is a business phone!so a business user doesnt need a camera!dont post any messages that say that this is a really bad phone,cuz it has no camera.its a business phone,a really good phone.if you want a camera,then buy yourself a digital camera,cuz all phone cameras are really bad.there is no phone yet to have a cmos or ccd sensor,so the pictures they take are crappy.no optical zoom,no sensor,no good lens,no nothing.the only good phone is the n90 like phone,i dont know how its called.the one with 3 mp,autofocus and 3x optical zoom.but even this amaizing camera phone doesnt have a good imaging processor.so,dont judge a phone by its camera,especially if its a business phone.
I think Nokia is scrapping the bottom of the barrel on their communicators. I honestly expected that a 9300i would be out with a camera as soon as the 9300 was announced. But nooo Nokia only added WLAN nothing else I’m very disappointed with Nokia on this phone. They did not even upgrad the Symbian I wonder who is going to buy this phone. Personally a Nokia person I was looking forward to buy a 9300i with a camera, now I have to wait for the Sony Ericson P990
I completely agree No use of having this one NO CHANGES WHATSOEVER APART FROM wlan , that all u Want NOKIA Frm ur loyal customers to spend another 38000INR ON SUCH PHONE which doesnt even have looks or nor worth it WAS WAITING fr a long time ,the launch of new communicator COMPLETELY DISAPOINTED
anttipng an striker r right regardin d camera but dis fone is stil disapointin considerin how much $$ it will b an onli as 1 mor feature dan d previous 1 but is also heavier nokia seem 2 like rippin off loyal consumers
no camera , no 3g compebality , no fm radio, its a hopless phone if you want to upgrade any model that you add latest feature in the hand set
I completely agree with you - this type of device does not need to be and indeed shouldn't be equipped with a camera....including one would only increase the cost and would be useless to most business users.
My main gripe with this is the fact that Nokia released the 9300 knowing full well they'd follow it up within a few months with an "updated" version. The "updates" are negligible and should have been included in the original.
awesome mobile with wondeful features in it...................I love it like any thing .................got every thing in it..
There seems to be alot of people here that don't understand that this is a phone for the corporate users. They don't want cameraphones. It's cocidered a risk as it eases attempt of espionage. R&D departments have been "no camera" zones for a long time.
very UGLI no camera an onli ting dats dif from 9300 is WLAN dis is preti much a HUGE waste ov time an $$$$
What on Earth is this? I've just compared the specs side by side and there seems to be only one single difference between this and the original 9300 and that is the addition of WLAN. That is of course if you don't count them completely screwing up the design as a difference.
Yet another case of Nokia conning their loyal customers. Why couldn't they just release the 9300 with WLAN instead of bleeding their loyal client base for every single penny.
Nokia, shame on you.
The camera is so good!!!!!!
i have one from a nokia company.
I buy it with 1000$ cash.