Hey , now Sony Ericsoon iz cuming to nokiaz level , but nokia ppl , make ur pace fast da sonyss r here eee ... & even p900 has 65k colours ... not only 9500 --->>> Capirconboy
As Nokia is a professional , but this phone ... is really good ... it has the complete .. awesome contents .. i hope the next will be more than that
go to this thread from hofo, and see for yourself how STUPID is the xda2.... then read the last thread, and see that nobody among the xda2 lover was able to answer back the argument thrown, because xda2 is crap! and what a price they pay for a crappy shity pda-phone
Boyz and girlz, just get the superb Chea 168 and get over it! Symbian? 168 got it. Don't be cheap and, once in you're life time, go on an buy a real phone, not just toyz!!!
I think the time of symbian OS is dying and microsoft is about to run the smartphone trend.Man those people at microsoft sure are greedy.
what r u talking about ppl..... comparing hopes and papers....
compare real phones to each others ...not 7700 or 9500 or t650 or P1000 .... what the fuck is P1000 anyway ...where did u hear about it???
p800 is good u say ???? it is a damned phone.... i couldnt see anything on the screen when i am outdoor.... what do u want more...?? SE has the worst camers ever....
compare phones in the same class u fools ....
why do u compare 6600 with p900 ??? both are different.....
6600 is a smartphone ... p900 is a PDA+phone.... got it ?
u want to compare p900 with something ... go a head compare it with PDA+phones models.... like the microsoft XDA2 (i-mate) right??? and after u finish comparing.... tell me...
what the hell made u choose p900 ???? it is the worst PDA phone with touch screen ( it took the title from p800) ...
and lets talk about the ediot t610.... what phone doesnt have the no. and dates for phone calls ??? how can it be so slow ??? can the camera be much worse????
now compare it with the 6220..... t610 wins becuz the screen resolution... so what u fools ??? the camera is shit .. u wont need a 65,000 colors anyway with this camera.... otherwise the 6220 is 5mbs video cam and everything else is better exept the bluetooth
for me i say.... f**k nokia and SE.... look at the japanes and korean.... they r comming.... take a look at the samsung and the i505 MS or d700 symbian... look at the panasonic x700....
look at the sendo and what r we expecting from it... the unbelievable sendo-x with internal memory 64mb and 4xzoom with flash and red eye
and look at the real king... the xda2.... with all microsoft somftware and the best camera after sharp
let me hear u say it..... F**K NOKIA AND SE
Uhm, sorry, gsmarena wont let me post it without putting a space in 6600. so remove the space in 6 600 in the URL, for it to work.
There's no point in arguing.
Look at my phones :
You can *CLEARLY* see that the 6600 is better.
And.. don't argue with me. everybody knows TFD is better than TFT or STN. STN is trash.
BOOM......................i think that both of phone's have good RF,but i wil try.
To Devil,The P900 has far better screen than the 6600,the color dept is the same,16 BIT screen but the P900 has more pixels and more colorfull than the 6600.
Devil,the T630 has a TFT 16 BIT screen,that means better than TFD and STN.So the T630 has better screen than the Z600.
T610 or 630 have terrible screens, and thats known. only z600 is acceptable cuz of tfd. 6600s screen is better than p900. better colors and depth.
Klass, P900 has a good RF indeed, but not as good as Nokia's RF... 3650 for example will beat P900 any time any where as far as RF is concerned, why don't you try it yourself...
Devil,the screens from the T610,Z600 and the T630 is far more supurieur than any Mokia.
The T310 is just a low end phone.
Also the menu and interface from the T610/T630/Z600 is the best of the rest,that is proven.
Also the you compare with newer phone's from Nokia agains the older phone's from SE,uou called the 6230,theire still not out yet in europe.
You cannot compare the 7600 with the T610/T630/Z600.
And the 6220 is only 5 MB and can videorecord Limit,that has nothing to do with superior about more MB's and recorder.If you look at the screen is 128x128 12 BIT screen and terrible menu and interfce..............that is so pitty from Nokia and you call it better than the Z600/T610/T630,that is not true.The Z600/T610/T630 have far more better screens 32 midi bleutoot build quality than any phone's from Nokia.The speakerphone,i use never that function is useless.
You say"The 6230 is the best phone ever, with MMC card slot, camera + video rec, mp3 player, EDGE (NO SE PHONE HAS IT!!!), bluetooth, 65k, and MANY MANY more"
That handset is not out yet,the screen from the 6230 is almost the same like other Nokia's models. 128x128 16 BIT screen Pitty,low quality MP3 player Pitty,video recorder is also low quality.
And the menu is soooooo boring.
The only what new is from the 6230 is EDGE,EDGE have no use in many country's But i'm agree with you about that.That EDGE a new feature is from Nokia but nothing more.
Wait until the presentation from SE Devil at 9 Maart,you compare with newer phone's from Nokia and bit older phone's from SE.
ahem......you cant say that nokia is the best.....there are many many phone companys out there who make better phones than nokia,so you still can't say that nokia is the best,and by the way 0.3megapixels is not a big deal and the nokia cams suck big time they are NOT full screen like SE or panasonic.
In smartphones : No doubt, SE takes the trophy home.
I mean regular mobiles. SE has the T310, T610, Z600, T630, as the major "leaders". Nokia now has 7600, 6220, and in 1 month 6230.
The T310 is crap.
The T610/630/Z600 have no integrated loudspeaker, 2MB memory, shitty screens, shitty cameras, and no video recorders.
The 7600 has a 0.3MP camera with video for 2:30 minutes, 29MB memory, mp3 player, WCDMA (which NO SE phone has except for z1010, but its still in factory), integrated loudspeaker and many more.
The 6220 has a video recorder and 5MB memory, plus loudspeaker.
The 6230 is the best phone ever, with MMC card slot, camera + video rec, mp3 player, EDGE (NO SE PHONE HAS IT!!!), bluetooth, 65k, and MANY MANY more!!!
I am not saying SE is shit, but Nokia is always the best...
I dont think the P1000 or whatever it will be called (rumors say P950) will be introduced/released before the 4Q of 2004... i mean, the P900 is still fresh. Klaas, who said i dont already love the P900? I myself have a Sony Ericsson P900, P800, Z600, a Nokia 6600, and a Nokia 7210. i dont 'hate' se... but Nokia is far more superior in most criterias.