Nokia Asha 300 - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
3.9%
Total hits:
4509445

Voting results

Design
6.6
Features
6.6
Performance
6.7
Votes:
76


Sort by:

> In reply to Nokia asha 300 is a @ 2011-11-06 02:08 from P@1G - click to readi have a cedar it's great. speaker is too low and the video recording is a bit slow but everything else is great :D and comparing the price range .... cedar is a clear winner :D

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-18 23:01
  • fkib
  • R

> In reply to pop2586 @ 2011-11-17 20:31 from fq1L - click to readAsha 300 is better. No doubt. Just go for it.
Its camera is good. Battery back up is good.
Video rec 30fps. So all is good. Go for it.
X2 takes 4-5 hours to charge the battery completely.
Asha 300 is Good choice.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-18 16:01
  • 4ZwS
  • H

> In reply to raj @ 2011-11-16 05:21 from 2ZYC - click to readwhats price of this handset ????????

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-18 14:38
  • 2ZYC
  • R

> In reply to rara @ 2011-11-18 06:47 from t}g{ - click to readNo its single sim mobile ......

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-18 14:36
  • 2ZYC
  • R

> In reply to pop2586 @ 2011-11-17 20:31 from fq1L - click to readdude asha 300 is best for u, it's battery backup, screen size, processor, degine, camera quality, sound everything is higher and better than x2, so go for 300 without any doubt and confusion. ok buddy.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-18 11:57
  • Xumd
  • R

this dual sim phone?

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-18 06:47
  • t}g{
  • Q

i'm confused between nokia x2 & asha 300 pls some one help

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-17 20:31
  • fq1L
  • Q

> In reply to tony @ 2011-11-15 08:53 from uW52 - click to readsamsung phones

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-17 13:28
  • t7xx
  • R

> In reply to SoLo @ 2011-11-16 21:12 from sUvZ - click to readThat's a good analysis.
And sure, it comes down to preference, but for me the fact that it's running S40 is an advantage. A big one.

This phone had me interested, but yeah, the disadvantage of not having WiFi is a bit too much for me.

Guess I'll have a look at the Asha 303..

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-17 11:47
  • vu4@
  • R

no wifi, waste..

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-17 11:01
  • u1v}
  • U

sar is 1.51
http://nds1.nokia.com/phones/f...00_UG_en.pdf

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-17 09:58
  • iBGy
  • U

Basic ADVANTAGE
-2.4" Biger screen in its class
-1 GHz processor for fast processing
-3G enabled phone (2mbps speed)
-Touch n Type
-Music quality sound speakers
-Extended battery power (1110 MAH)

Basic DISADVANTAGE
- S40 UI (still nokia working on old java s40)
-5MP (looks like the resolution of nokiaX2 family bad)
-No WiFi (wish it could have)
-167 ppi pixel density (which is quite low)

CONCLUSION: Nokia Asha 300 is a low budget feature phone with lots of basic functions so no more bad comments .Thankyou :)

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-16 21:12
  • sUvZ
  • U

How much is this phone and how good is it

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-16 21:10
  • fsVb
  • Q

whtz price of this phone????????????????

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-16 16:14
  • U@rH
  • U

1GHz processor with 128MB Ram .........What a funny configuration..............!another funny thing is still they are with resistive touch screen....ha ha ha

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-16 15:51
  • uta5
  • C

> In reply to raj @ 2011-11-16 05:21 from 2ZYC - click to readhow much did it cost u...???

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-16 14:42
  • uvhh
  • Q

Hey guys, by now you should realise Asha 300 is a Series 40 phone with NO WLAN. Even the old E52 has both wlan and document editor. What a disappointment!

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-16 11:06
  • TIEZ
  • U

I bought yesterday this mobile very nice mobile

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-16 05:21
  • 2ZYC
  • U

If it's true that it has wi-fi, and all the other specs are as they are stated here, for this price it's awesome.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-16 04:03
  • Mtr9
  • U

Awesome considering its price group!

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-15 19:33
  • XuHg
  • C

Sort by:
Total of 1775 user reviews and opinions for Nokia Asha 300.