I can't believe this guy.... This wreck has issues man.... He's comparing apples and oranges and still doesn't get it. Sony ericsson and nokia has remained rivals for a long time.... Here c2 and cedar are poles apart. They have their own selling points. C2 is definitely value for money while cedar is a bit into quality over quantity (apart from camera and looks). And taking about looks, i disagree with wreck. C2 is a really good looking phone. It has negatives but so do cedar....
[deleted post]Thank you wreck, for accepting your guilt at last.
After a series of flips & flops to go for either c2 or cedar and based on your last post I purchased a new C2-01 black color.
It is really splendid I feel happy. :)
wreck, 17 Jun 2011Photos doesnt speak everything buddy.
If it does how is x3 all glazing and blazing in its net... moreWreck, haven't you become too freaky & crazy in your love with cedar.
I would advice... go and have some fresh air.
If the photoshop & dreamweaver is available for NOKIA guys then they are available to SONY guys too. So by your words you mean to say that SONY is not using the technology to its full advantage - thats another lopside!
But why does the sony cedar appear ugly even in pictures. I hope in reality it would be even more.
Buck up NOKIA C2-01 fans. You are the winner again.
Its an old man saying "old is gold".
And so is the advice of an old man.
The classic NOKIA c2-01 is really nice. Go for it!
Its better to go for cheap & best mobiles - and NOKIA is perfect.
You can go for other brands - only if you wish to experiment and if money is not important for you otherwise NOKIA c2-01 is the best in its price range - worth every single penny.
Real, 16 Jun 2011Wreck, mind it, we are not bothered about price of various phones at Universal. We take into c... morePhotos doesnt speak everything buddy.
If it does how is x3 all glazing and blazing in its net photos and so glum and gloomy in real life?
We call it photoshop, manufacturers call it marketing techniques.
Please dont be an empty-head and judge whats good looking like this.
[deleted post]Oh my god.
Wat a loser you are.
You can make names but cant change your ip mr. W47E .
Now copying others names inorder to tell lies and so desperately trying to argue c2 is good.
If you dare, tell me how many apps you can run simultaneously in c2?
Hey it is not a good mobile because sound quality is not good in this camera is good only in light when you capture a photo in some night then it is very bad and its display is bad than 2700c its only for 3g not for all overall 2700c is a better handset
Real, 16 Jun 2011 Perhaps, wreck forgot to compare LOOKS. C2-01 looks are far better than that of UGLY cedar. ... moreya.u r absolutly right..,i request u to view and put some commends on nokia x2's page.
Ya its gud phone bt the battery backup is wrst.bfore u buying ask the retailer wats the batery up k.tanks
Wow! What a nice phone from nokia. I luv this phone so much. So much fast INTERNET and u can also use it as a modem in computer by connecting via ovi suite. Gud features like 3.2 mega pixels camera with nice flash, 3g enabled, bluetooth, expandable memory upto 16GB, java, video recorder and player. Gud audio sound. A gud phone by nokia at such a amazing price...
[deleted post]both c2 and ceder r of same features.......... u can buy any mobile......... I think ceder is better..........
[deleted post]Why are you calling someone who accepts the truth and the best a fanboy?
What else you say everyone should do, bet over the limping horse and we call our own bluff ?
[deleted post]Wreck, mind it, we are not bothered about price of various phones at Universal. We take into consideration only the market price in the general market.
I request forum users to do a market survey before deciding on the prices mentioned on this forum... as there are many brand ambassadors of various mobiles [cedar]and various mobile shops [universal] floating their views on this forum to mislead the people.
So beware of these ambassadors and you will not feel the guilt afterwards.
Perhaps, wreck forgot to compare LOOKS. C2-01 looks are far better than that of UGLY cedar.
And your comparison of cost is funny [under 5000]. The market price difference is of whopping 1200 for c2-01  and cedar . So your opinion fails here too.
The BATTERY comparison is only applicable for you... most users find average battery life of c2-01 to be above 72 hours under normal usage [maybe your friends phone battery needs replacement as it is giving only 27-33 hours backup..check it once].
Nokia battery's uses proven Li-ion tech while the cedar uses Li-Po tech... which is still under R&D phase [read the security hazards of a Li-Po battery regarding overcharging]
Also... do not compare the phones by just taking into consideration only your friends mobile. Its not fair. The usage, network connectivity etc vary from person to person, SIM to SIM & device to device. So you should see the views of many persons and then give advice to others... otherwise your advice is bound to get biased.
Lastly... as you said about usability [user-interface] so most of the persons have nokia phones previously so switching to another NOKIA phone is easier than to new sony interface - you have accepted this.
Nokia c2-01 is the winner again!
All the best for the defeated cedar & cedar-users.
PEOPLE, Go for Nokia and don't think about other brands - in support of this statement go through many views on this forum and you will find that most users are satisfied with Nokia c2-01. They are actually loving it.
[deleted post]hey wreck,the price of c2-01 in india rs 3700. X2, 4300 ,Ceader costs rs 4900..c5 cost 7500.when i bought it it costs rs 7150.
pls someone tell me any antivirus which this handset supports and if possible provide link also.