Sony Xperia S review: NXT of kin
Samsung Galaxy S II ICS review: Sugar coatedNokia E50 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.2
- Features
-
8.1
- Performance
-
8.2
- Aaliyah
- Report
- 0
its actually a nice phone. i cant say that i totally like it 100% but i think this phone is cool!
- Reply
- 2006-05-18 16:49
- PZts
- U
- Jack Ridveira
- Report
- 0
+Quite slim actually.
+And not too much weight either.
+Better size on buttons.
-Maybe Nokia cut too much features
of this one. (Camera)
- Reply
- 2006-05-18 16:42
- ni5%
- U
- AuneE BaBa
- Report
- 0
Good Work Nokia.. Now nokia is coming back to track... only the radio is missing but no worries... the handset has a real professional look
- Reply
- 2006-05-18 16:18
- PDTv
- U
- ianfrey
- Report
- 0
looks more like a replacement for the 6310i, seems ok, but lacking a little.
- Reply
- 2006-05-18 16:07
- ixrg
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Weight is good for a smart phone, good idea to have optional camera as some work places dont allow cameras, pity there is no wifi
- Reply
- 2006-05-18 16:04
- UiR}
- U
- grant
- Report
- 0
nice phone no doubt, it seems nokia is downgrading, maybe if we can wait awhile we may get the E10 with no camera as well but affordable and workable --yes patience
- Reply
- 2006-05-18 15:50
- mcyh
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Don't you read " Optional 1.3 MP camera as accessory"
- Reply
- 2006-05-18 15:24
- nUVV
- U
- Hans_Daniel_07
- Report
- 0
Huh?!! Another E-Series addition??but why it is alone?? i don't understand what nokia is trying to play..but this phone is certainly belongs to E-Series..so it is intended as "business phone" that's why it lacks built-in camera..but i should say..i admit! D design wag great..but its really strange releasing this one in juz a snap!Hmmmmmn..
- Reply
- 2006-05-18 15:22
- PSkJ
- U
