8 megapixel mega shootout: Picture this
Nokia 700 review: Agent seven double-ohNokia E55 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.4
- Features
-
8.4
- Performance
-
8.4
- rama
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-03-15 09:52 from TL5Y - click to readQ2 = second quarter of the year. The year is divided into 4 quarters. Jan-Mar, Apr-Jun, Jul-Sep, Oct-Dec.
- Reply
- 2009-03-16 10:57
- Mj2h
- R
- ronP1
- Report
- 0
this would have been the real successor of SE P1 if and only if it integrates touchscreen. sighs.
- Reply
- 2009-03-16 08:48
- whBv
- U
- krunal
- Report
- 0
i have an e51 .looking for a replacement. was quite surprised that nokia decided to use a lower spec processor for e75. confused now between e71 and e55. can anyone help?
- Reply
- 2009-03-16 06:42
- upc1
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
it isnt very speedy. watch videos of e55 on youtube closely. i was expecting speed with 600mhz(:
- Reply
- 2009-03-15 17:25
- PArt
- U
- Amber
- Report
- 0
I own the E66 and I love the comfortable keypad. I was hoping to get this one too, but I'm slightly worried about the half-QWERTY keypad; I can't imagine using it.
- Reply
- 2009-03-15 17:01
- UD}w
- C
- Neal
- Report
- 0
This phone is awesome. It would have even better if they'd put 2.8" screen(same like n95 8gb) plus stereo speaker.
- Reply
- 2009-03-15 11:36
- vU2U
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Original_Jamaican @ 2009-03-13 16:35 from ka85 - click to readI agree. I read the e55 review at mobile-review and it was mentioned that the e51 successor shall have the same pricing as e55.
- Reply
- 2009-03-14 15:22
- 3LX{
- R
- Ted
- Report
- 0
This is a great phone and would be perfect for me. Look at to the spec it's so flawless. This phone is so gorgeous and i want to buy this phone someday.
- Reply
- 2009-03-14 08:14
- j{kC
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Original_Jamaican @ 2009-03-13 16:35 from ka85 - click to readnice comparison. a similar comparison/analysis is required between e55 and e71. thanks
- Reply
- 2009-03-13 17:39
- PArt
- R
- Original_Jamaican
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anónimo PT @ 2009-03-13 15:55 from m}9e - click to readHow can the E55 be the younger brother of the E51 when:
1. It has almost twice the clock speed
2. It has more RAM
3. It has a higher camera
4. It has built in GPS along with a digital compass
5. Wi-Fi also supports UPnP
6. 3G is much faster
7. It has feature pack 2
8. It has a secondary camera for video calls
9. It has a larger screen
10. It has a much more powerful battery
This is actually a higher class phone.
It is said that despite what many people think. The E51 hasn't been upgraded yet. It is said that Nokia decided to debut a new E5x series.
It has been said that the E51's successor should come sometime this year and it may be called E52.
- Reply
- 2009-03-13 16:35
- ka85
- R
- Original_Jamaican
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Andre @ 2009-03-12 21:54 from uEyn - click to readANDRE,
It has 100MB of internal memory NOT 60MB. Many people (including myself) got tricked because of GSMArena's error.
Find out everything and more by going to the official:
http://www.forum.nokia.com/devices/E55
- Reply
- 2009-03-13 16:26
- ka85
- R
- Anónimo PT
- Report
- 0
How can it be slow with an overclocked ARM 11 running at 600Mhz? even the amount of "ram" (don't know if it is ram or somethin' like it) seems to be pretty decent. This is the younger brother of E51.. must be great =)
- Reply
- 2009-03-13 15:55
- m}9e
- R
- John
- Report
- 0
From nokia web site say it's 100 mb internal memory and 256 mb nand flash, i think nand flash is ram memory i don't really know. Anybody know exatly what is nand flash?
- Reply
- 2009-03-13 10:22
- j{kC
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
what if it is a good looking phone with lots of features BUT if its slow....it would be a useless phone then...
- Reply
- 2009-03-13 10:10
- PDTe
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Andre @ 2009-03-12 21:54 from uEyn - click to read
thats why i earlier said how can people rate the performance before actually using the phone...
- Reply
- 2009-03-13 10:09
- PDTe
- R
