Nokia E7 - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
0.7%
Total hits:
12201046

Voting results

Design
7.8
Features
7.7
Performance
7.5
Votes:
143

Sort by:

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-09-17 18:12 from 0xYR - click to readBuy N8 then.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 19:05
  • 0TvM
  • R

A good and fine phone but no DivX player

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 19:03
  • 0LK0
  • U

dear "all photograpers"... pls buy separate a camera...

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 18:50
  • veNr
  • U
  • muhammad akram khan
  • Report
  • Rating0

this a just n8
Is camera carl zeiss?
Video not improved than 720 @25 fps
Cpu not improved
No fm tansmitter in radio
No printer
No ptt
Why no improvement over previous models

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 18:49
  • Uq4S
  • U

Nice looking phone!!! But i m waiting for milestone2. An Android change-over will likely me more of new features than a symbian-upgrade from n95-2. Better to enjoy a cocktail than a single OS.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 18:45
  • kUW@
  • U

> In reply to Crystal @ 2010-09-17 15:23 from fXe3 - click to readNokia says the focus is 50 cm to infinity which means no macro, no autofocus. A shame for such a good looking phone. :-(

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 18:12
  • 0xYR
  • R

Depending what user expect from phone and what does he mainly uses it for, this can be perfect phone, but there are always those who think you must fly to the moon with one to be good phone... So my sugestion is first to think what do you use phone for before saying its good or bad... :)

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 17:27
  • snUw
  • U

shame on you Nokia, what a stupid processor and low ram, and very stupid resolution on such a good screen
360 x 640 pixels, 4.0 inches
seriously Nokia your E7 doesn't worth anything.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 16:36
  • 3W$a
  • U

just a questin
why Android and Apple fags,sorry fans
are here

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 16:36
  • fvT7
  • U

> In reply to Michel @ 2010-09-17 11:45 from mSsG - click to readnokia haters, please shut ya mouth now if u have nothing to say!!!!
this phone is a paradise!
go nokia!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 15:25
  • N7B9
  • R

This phone HAS to have a memory card slot! I think its located behind the battery....This phone is a year older than the n97,and that old junk packed 32gb internal + card slot....
Nokia would never make such a design flaw.
And it HAS to have Autofocus....Just because they never say it has, it doesn't mean it doesn't have it! Autofocus is NEEDED for over 5mp camera's, if you didn't know that.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 15:23
  • fXe3
  • U

> In reply to Michel @ 2010-09-17 11:45 from mSsG - click to readThink about it a bit before you type. Symbian was designed to run on low power, low memory devices, without draining the battery heavily. It dosn't need as much processing power to achive the same as operating systems origionally designed for the desktop or server. Judging phones by processor size is stupid. The question are... Does it respond fast enough when I touch the screen? Can it play a video at native resolution without drop outs and still recive a call in the middle. Can it run 5 apps simultaniously, includeing sat nav, and still recieve calls without crashing. From what I've seen and herd so far, the answer is yes to all of the above.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 15:18
  • IaF8
  • R

shame on you Nokia, what a stupid processor and low ram for a nice good looking set.
shame on you.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 15:15
  • 3W$a
  • U

i like this phone. the feature i need available in this phone . i definitely buy this phone what is the price of this phone in indian currency.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 15:10
  • bJ7T
  • U

Hi, i want to know which sound quality is better c7 or e7 ? cause i care . Plz. I have 5530 but i want to take sym^3 bkoz it is faster and i wish there are enough RAM FREE in sym^3 and fast enough to handle more app.
Any one help me with answers plz
Ahmed from iraq.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 13:20
  • vWrU
  • U

> In reply to hayato @ 2010-09-17 12:12 from t7Xh - click to read...And different priorities, in addition to that.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 12:17
  • t7Xh
  • R

> In reply to Michel @ 2010-09-17 11:45 from mSsG - click to read"not objectively very good" - you said your opinion in a more acceptable manner. No problem.

And we're not defending nokia, we're just saying what we saw about the product that some people failed to see. Nokia's just beyond all the numbers you see on the spec page. And our goal is to help people understand the point of this kind of phones. Anyways, it's not like you are all that easy to convince. But at least, you'll have to know that we have other reasons to buy the product, not just because it's crap like most haters say. And if indeed low processor and resolution is crap, we already knew it beforehand, we're not blind not to see the specs, but we will still choose it. People have preferences, i guess.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 12:12
  • t7Xh
  • R

> In reply to Raul @ 2010-09-17 11:24 from pr3f - click to readIt has document editor. Premium quality application only for e-series phones.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 11:48
  • t7Xh
  • R

You know what I find incredibly funny? That no matter what kind of phone Nokia releases, no matter how underpowered, no matter how low-res the screen, no matter how unfriendly the OS, a handful of people will defend it to the death. Why? Do you have Nokia stock? Seriously, it's 2010: you can't put out a four-inch screen with less than wvga resolution. Nor can you accept a 680 MHz processor in a flagship phone.
I'm not going to argue that certain other phones are better; I'm just saying that this phone is OBJECTIVELY not very good. Simple as that.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 11:45
  • mSsG
  • U

> In reply to Raul @ 2010-09-17 11:24 from pr3f - click to readit is not the same the screen is 4inch memory is different

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-17 11:39
  • fwMe
  • R
Sort by:
Total of 6153 user reviews and opinions for Nokia E7.