Nokia, am a great fan of you. Nokia is giving best hardware specs in all models except in the case of camera. surely this lumia 635 will be priced aboove 14 k. see the model is not providing secondary camera and flash and this model is only powered with 512 mb outdated ram comparing to 525 (Rs. 9800) itself. the phone has both 3g and 4g network support, we know that this is mainly for video conferencing. But without secondary camera how this is possible..?
and without flash, what will be the quality of the picture at night and low light places.?
so this two are just importanct facts and nokia should provide this anyway. otherwise please deduce the price tag for this type of models.
Hope Nokia will fullfill our needs. :)
no flash and no front camera, its cool because i dont give a rat's behind on those. Hell, u can take the back camera too. These features are for nerds, btw, if u need flash so bad go get a real camera. But the 512 ram, kinda low, and u increased the screen size but u made low ppi. Those are the real downsides
Nokia is thinking now not in 2014 technology.It is having 2004 ideas.waste phone.now a days octacore processor Qualcomm snapdragon 801 CPU lineup companies are intex,karbonn,micromax,gionee,xiaomi.where is Nokia in this range.
annu7, 03 Apr 2014whts the difference between 630 and 635635 HSDPA, 42.2 Mbps; HSUPA, 5.76 Mbps; LTE, Cat3, 50 Mbps UL, 100 Mbps DL
630 HSDPA, 21 Mbps; HSUPA, 5.76 Mbps
Anonymous, 03 Apr 2014I think l625 better it h big screen , front cam , main cam with flash , n same 4g same ram same cpu.I like it its better than 625 but front cam and flash could make it best selling in this price tag
annu7, 03 Apr 2014whts the difference between 630 and 635The Lumia 630 in 3G single SIM and the first Lumia with 3G Dual SIM. Lumia 635 is single sim with 4G/LTE.
I think l625 better it h big screen , front cam , main cam with flash , n same 4g same ram same cpu.
no flash, no front facing cam, 512mb ram, low ppi,but still it is a good phone maybe not great. So stop complaining, considering it's price.
do you really need a flash or you just don't know how to take photos? study and read about photography and you'll know what I'm talking about, ok? =) cheers!
I find this disappointing because I was developing interest for WP. Is it to replace the Lumia 5xx series or what? Its a step backward. Lumia 620 had a front facing camera this has neither that or a flash. Plus i find the pixel density on the 720 (217ppi)very annoying as its not sharp and one can see the pixels, compared to the 620 (246ppi). This new phone is just as bad as the 720.. smh
Where do we place this exactly?
Another failure, no flash, 512MB of RAM, screen resolution is better suited for screens of 4-4.3 inches. I've expected little bit better phone than lumia 520/525/625, at least camera flash.
This phone and lumia 630 is just another low budget phone, all that i want is lumia with middle budget and at least 1GB RAM, because lately they released just high budget and low budget, no mid :( please
1 GB RAM, flash wth 2K+ price wud've done gr8.
This is non-sense.
i dnt see ny reason y wont i go for 520/525 then these 2 entiques !
This device targets lower end market. If this is priced at $150, or heck even lower, this will give a very tight competition to the what's called the 'Best budget phone of 2013', the Moto G. People should stop whining about front facing camera (only useful for video calls. Other than that, useless) and it's 512 MB RAM, because windows is more efficient. 512 MB can be equivalent to 1 GB in android.
Another failure device from MS & NOKIA. Lumia 520, 525, 630, 635...
No Front Cam
Still 512 MB RAM...
mohan, 03 Apr 2014those who say it lacks front cam and flash..it is a budget phone kepp that in mind before comm... moreThey are not shitty devices. They actually understood the customers. Also see about Moto G all bigger things comes in small packages. Thats y nokia lost its market. But still they are not changing.