Nokia Lumia 800 - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
3.8%
Total hits:
13340261

Voting results

Design
7.8
Features
7.4
Performance
7.6
Votes:
403

Sort by:

Nice!

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 11:56
  • Kg$q
  • C

its not built from ground up.

its sill windowsCE kernel just updated

its lipstick on a pick n900 with 600mhz outperform it cuz linux kernel is just better,

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 10:56
  • Pv9c
  • U

so, you think samsung is copying little from nokia, little from apple, little from motorola, little from htc etc..
and reach the number ONE position today ha ha ha........
Nothing can come near the King of the smart phone.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 09:57
  • Xue3
  • U

> In reply to th3D @ 2011-11-05 18:47 from nbbg - click to readHAHA...you are wrong.

Samsung constantly updated Bada OS(currently 1.2) for WAVE 2 and recently announced Bada OS 2.0.

Don't get me wrong. Personally i prefer symbian over bada(not sure about window tho), but your pathetic misleading comment is hard to pass by.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 09:07
  • YPb1
  • R

Why no secondary camera??

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 08:21
  • KIdq
  • C

> In reply to th3D @ 2011-11-05 18:47 from nbbg - click to read"Windows Mobile OS has proven too many times in the past that it doesnt have the right of life."

The Windows Phone OS is completely unrelated to the older Windows Mobile OS. It's built from the ground up. If you have actually used this OS, you would know.

When I first saw Windows Phone OS, I didn't think I would like it (was gonna pick Android), but when I actually gave it a chance, I found it was really easy to use, tightly integrate with social networking, and relatively bug free.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 07:19
  • ii9f
  • R

> In reply to 3iff @ 2011-11-06 00:50 from nEqm - click to read"Its a windows 8 mobile, you will get all updates and etc with whole better experience than that old s60 or s90. Nokia is not making any more of that crap."

For one, don't call it Windows 8 'Mobile' - it really goes against the point you are trying to make. This may cause people associate Windows Phone with the older and completely unrelated Windows Mobile platform, which, let's be honest here, wasn't the best OS around. People need to realize that Windows Phone is built from the ground up, and shares nothing from its predecessor.

The other thing is, is that you should not call something 'crap'. There is a lot of Nokia/Symbian loyalist here, so if your bagging their OS of choice (that they might be choosing to move from), really doesn't make for good first impressions for the Windows Phone community.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 06:05
  • ii9f
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-11-06 05:52 from ii9f - click to read"The bright side of this ARM version is that it should be a cleaner/slimmer kernel than X86 kernel."

By this I mean slimmer than its desktop counterpart. Current Windows Phone OS is built on Windows CE Kernel.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 05:57
  • ii9f
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-11-05 21:34 from s8aZ - click to readIt has been said that all current Windows Phones will be able to update to Windows Phone 8 Apollo. It is, however, unknown if they will receive any major versions after Windows Phone 8; i.e Windows Phone 9. Rest assure though, that they will receive incremental updates. You also got to take note that most other OS's only support previous phones for a few versions too. Also, Windows Phone 8 is said to be built upon Windows NT ARM kernel, the effects of this on current hardware are yet to be seen, of course. The bright side of this ARM version is that it should be a cleaner/slimmer kernel than X86 kernel.

P.S. I used to use Symbian OS a lot - NGage, N70, 6120c, N97. Although a good OS at the time, it didn't age well, especially once touchscreens became the norm.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 05:52
  • ii9f
  • R

Really Smart,eh!!!!
.....where are video call camera, JAVA, NFC, external memory slot, inbuilt documents editing software, wifi hotspot, gyrosensor, flash support, U tube etc etc etc.........

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 04:30
  • 7qxT
  • C

7 2 0p?really?

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 03:00
  • 4D1E
  • C

It doesn't suport java app,...

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 02:07
  • 95WG
  • U

Fan of nokia 4 many years but Window custom is not my choice.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 01:06
  • Xuef
  • U

Fan of nokia 4 many years but Window custom is not my choice.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 01:06
  • Xuef
  • U

I just want another N8 with great camera, dual-core procesor 1.4GHz and Symbian Belle .... !!!

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 01:05
  • 0T1H
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-11-05 21:34 from s8aZ - click to readIts a windows 8 mobile, you will get all updates and etc with whole better experience than that old s60 or s90. Nokia is not making any more of that crap.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 00:50
  • nEqm
  • R

I suggest GMS Arena post new price phone and where to buy it will help
thanks

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 00:49
  • 4TIE
  • U

i love lumia 800

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-05 22:32
  • KIes
  • R

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsun...937-4158.php

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-05 22:23
  • mhT3
  • R

> In reply to th3D @ 2011-11-05 18:53 from nbbg - click to readyou can put your own files.. you just have to know how... i'm doing it with the itunes for a while... everything can be hacked ;)

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-05 22:23
  • HCg{
  • U
Sort by:
Total of 5521 user reviews and opinions for Nokia Lumia 800.