Nokia Lumia 800 - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
4.9%
Total hits:
13707930

Voting results

Design
7.8
Features
7.4
Performance
7.6
Votes:
405

Sort by:

Have used one..........slick, responsive, stunning design and great build(fingers crossed)......I want one.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 23:10
  • mHiA
  • U

> In reply to nokia rulez @ 2011-11-05 18:43 from vbRD - click to readYou are so out! ... most iphone4 users already changed their religion, now they believe in Samsung Galaxy SGSII.

Recent iphone4 or 4S buyers are those people who had never owned a smartphone; and most of these people have no idea what smartphones are about, they just go for the Apple name!

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 21:04
  • TCXw
  • R

> In reply to th3D @ 2011-11-05 18:47 from nbbg - click to readNokia with Microsoft is going to rock the world with hundreds of millions of phone and with many models.
This Nokia Lumia 800 is the foundation of the future.

Nokia has the greatest designs and hardware offerings. Microsoft has the best softwares and multi-platform ecosystem.
Both are tuned to productivity and style.

Soon, Nokia will complement it more with its own ecosystem of softwares from Symbian and new developers.
It has been announced that many productive apps are going to be there for free and many enggaging games from EA will come. Has it already ? Someone please confirms.

Oh, interesting feature is online syncing of One Note with other Windows Phones and computers. Example : shopping list is updated and can be seen by you and your mom/wife at home.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 17:21
  • PFx9
  • R

> In reply to th3D @ 2011-11-05 18:47 from nbbg - click to readAnd WIndows+Nokia will be a happy store just because Nokia has taken Windows as their only choice now .. Now both Windows and Nokia has been falling down in mobile industries .. And they know their mistakes .. Windows has already released their 7.5 .. And Nokia is still releasing update for symbian .. Even for nokia 5800 which i am still having .. Why they won't do it for Windows phones ??

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 17:06
  • utca
  • R

> In reply to th3D @ 2011-11-05 18:47 from nbbg - click to readYeah .. I knew before there wont be many softwares or apps available etc .. But i really did not think before that the OS itself will be so laggy and there wont be any fixes too .. Between i did not bring bada here .. Someone was saying that bada was good .. thats why i replied to him ..

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 17:02
  • utca
  • R

> In reply to shaik @ 2011-11-05 19:57 from HkqZ - click to readwow...I'm shocked. ur english is very poor buddy....

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 16:32
  • PS6w
  • R

Nice!

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 11:56
  • Kg$q
  • C

its not built from ground up.

its sill windowsCE kernel just updated

its lipstick on a pick n900 with 600mhz outperform it cuz linux kernel is just better,

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 10:56
  • Pv9c
  • U

so, you think samsung is copying little from nokia, little from apple, little from motorola, little from htc etc..
and reach the number ONE position today ha ha ha........
Nothing can come near the King of the smart phone.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 09:57
  • Xue3
  • U

> In reply to th3D @ 2011-11-05 18:47 from nbbg - click to readHAHA...you are wrong.

Samsung constantly updated Bada OS(currently 1.2) for WAVE 2 and recently announced Bada OS 2.0.

Don't get me wrong. Personally i prefer symbian over bada(not sure about window tho), but your pathetic misleading comment is hard to pass by.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 09:07
  • YPb1
  • R

Why no secondary camera??

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 08:21
  • KIdq
  • C

> In reply to th3D @ 2011-11-05 18:47 from nbbg - click to read"Windows Mobile OS has proven too many times in the past that it doesnt have the right of life."

The Windows Phone OS is completely unrelated to the older Windows Mobile OS. It's built from the ground up. If you have actually used this OS, you would know.

When I first saw Windows Phone OS, I didn't think I would like it (was gonna pick Android), but when I actually gave it a chance, I found it was really easy to use, tightly integrate with social networking, and relatively bug free.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 07:19
  • ii9f
  • R

> In reply to 3iff @ 2011-11-06 00:50 from nEqm - click to read"Its a windows 8 mobile, you will get all updates and etc with whole better experience than that old s60 or s90. Nokia is not making any more of that crap."

For one, don't call it Windows 8 'Mobile' - it really goes against the point you are trying to make. This may cause people associate Windows Phone with the older and completely unrelated Windows Mobile platform, which, let's be honest here, wasn't the best OS around. People need to realize that Windows Phone is built from the ground up, and shares nothing from its predecessor.

The other thing is, is that you should not call something 'crap'. There is a lot of Nokia/Symbian loyalist here, so if your bagging their OS of choice (that they might be choosing to move from), really doesn't make for good first impressions for the Windows Phone community.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 06:05
  • ii9f
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-11-06 05:52 from ii9f - click to read"The bright side of this ARM version is that it should be a cleaner/slimmer kernel than X86 kernel."

By this I mean slimmer than its desktop counterpart. Current Windows Phone OS is built on Windows CE Kernel.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 05:57
  • ii9f
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-11-05 21:34 from s8aZ - click to readIt has been said that all current Windows Phones will be able to update to Windows Phone 8 Apollo. It is, however, unknown if they will receive any major versions after Windows Phone 8; i.e Windows Phone 9. Rest assure though, that they will receive incremental updates. You also got to take note that most other OS's only support previous phones for a few versions too. Also, Windows Phone 8 is said to be built upon Windows NT ARM kernel, the effects of this on current hardware are yet to be seen, of course. The bright side of this ARM version is that it should be a cleaner/slimmer kernel than X86 kernel.

P.S. I used to use Symbian OS a lot - NGage, N70, 6120c, N97. Although a good OS at the time, it didn't age well, especially once touchscreens became the norm.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 05:52
  • ii9f
  • R

Really Smart,eh!!!!
.....where are video call camera, JAVA, NFC, external memory slot, inbuilt documents editing software, wifi hotspot, gyrosensor, flash support, U tube etc etc etc.........

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 04:30
  • 7qxT
  • C

7 2 0p?really?

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 03:00
  • 4D1E
  • C

It doesn't suport java app,...

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 02:07
  • 95WG
  • U

Fan of nokia 4 many years but Window custom is not my choice.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 01:06
  • Xuef
  • U

Fan of nokia 4 many years but Window custom is not my choice.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-06 01:06
  • Xuef
  • U
Sort by:
Total of 5567 user reviews and opinions for Nokia Lumia 800.