Nokia N71 - user opinions and reviews

Nokia

Popularity

Daily interest
0.5%
Total hits:
1870587

Voting results

Design
7.9
Features
8.0
Performance
8.0
Votes:
4874

Sort by:

I think this phone does have a lot of potential. This phone cannot be compared to the razr cause the razr simply sucks. Even it's newer version does not have what this phone has. You can say the phone is bulky, but this is just as big as the razr in width and height if not slimness. 2MP Camera, Good MP3 Functions / Radio (no rds? :(..) Everything that is enough for someone who knows their phones.

Question: Does this phone comes with it's own data cable cords for the computer? What headsets does this phone come with? Thanks.

I voted it for a 5 (Suppose to be 7) for Design, 10 for Feature, and another 10 for Performance. Would be better if Nokia somehow made the battery life longer.. Big screen = Good!

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-26 03:59
  • QwEL
  • U

N71 is a very big phone to any users and its have no riging mode. I think N71 is bad Nokia phone.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-24 07:38
  • RLmH
  • U

hey i think it;s a very good phone it is nice and 123 1 means good 2 means very good 3 means perfect 123 123 123 123 123 123

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-23 22:39
  • TXH7
  • U

Are you completely crazy yo??About the Motorola razr v3x,I have to say the following:1)It does'nt even have a radio!! 2)bluetooth is 1.2(older than SE W810),3)It has only 24 polyphonic channels!!,4)Camera is also worse than in SE W810,5)and finally,I have to add the unbeliveable:IT DOES'NT EVEN HAVE AN infrared port!! HA!HA!

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-23 17:53
  • iCvP
  • U

Yes, but the v3x is not even a smartphone.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-22 13:28
  • mY73
  • U

geez people the only phone you can compare it its the motorola razr v3x amd have less features... check it out yourself

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-21 08:00
  • Pv9c
  • U

1)bluetooth is old(1.2),2)FM radio is without RDS,3)USB is pop-port(while in SE W810 it is v2.0),4)memory is only 10Mb,5)too heavy(139g),6)too fat(25,8mm),7)whithout autofocus(which can be found in w810),8)camera is 1600x1200pixels(while in w810 it is 1632x1224 and so better),9)whithout picture editor(which can be found in w810),10)symbian programs are too slow,11)battery has only 220 h standby time and just 4 h talktime(while in SE W810 is 350 h and 8 h),12)as i said,3g is not so important for the reasons i already mentioned

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-16 07:30
  • S7Ur
  • U

Its great to see how people vote these phones.. Hmm Sony Ericsson W810 has 8.4 in the features, this got only 7.8 and the w810 doesnt even have a 3g. This one got. Lot of laugh.. If the phone looks good, ok, lets give 10 point for features! this sucks.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-13 21:54
  • mhW6
  • U

it is really awesome mobiloe phone i like it it great

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-12 21:22
  • P$52
  • U

Not bad,however it's my second coice.I think SE W810i is much more better and much more beautyfull.3g is nothing for me,since it is only good for serfing in WAP(and so too expencive),as well as for videocalling(which is not good because it's not for free,and because it is not comfortable for everybody to be seen in phone,for examble when in bed whith pyjamas).N71 has nothing more to offer in comparison to SE W810 which i thing will be my next phone as soon as it comes on the market.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-09 19:07
  • MZuL
  • U

Great looking phone, full featured, bring it on Nokia!

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-08 23:24
  • iLVH
  • U

Wonder why Nokia is trying clamshell..horrible!! Better stick to Candybar...

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-04 21:34
  • jc}9
  • U

i like this phone but it is very expensive as well very big in use.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-04 09:38
  • nHKJ
  • U

This is the clamshell brick! Too big for any use.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-02 12:06
  • PUZe
  • U

I like this phone.

  • Reply
  • 2006-01-01 17:15
  • mY73
  • U

Serhio-Roberto, and the rest of the guys, this is part of Nokia stratgey to have not had all the features in one single phone. This is a norm since few years back.

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-31 12:10
  • PFMY
  • U

why don't they put for ringing also video? and why don't they put a 3 MP camera on this phone? and why the media player doesn't play more formats ov video? for example normal avi? we have memory to put them, no? on SD card!

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-29 12:03
  • SqMY
  • U

it belongs to nokia xpress music ,so obviously its speaker must be very good i hope .n91 and 3250 also belongs to this group of dedicated music machines.

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-24 23:59
  • U2eU
  • U

Truly a masterpiece flip till now from Nokia.
Still it should have had got a twist design. Does anyone know about the sound quality of this phone? Also how does the new web page viewer work on this phone?

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-20 10:57
  • 2S$d
  • U

is the internal memory enough// ?? i mean like, it is only 10 mb ..

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-17 15:17
  • PGH5
  • U
Sort by:
Total of 879 user reviews and opinions for Nokia N71.