Motorola RAZR XT910 review: Through thick and thin
BlackBerry Bold 9900 review: Business reimaginedNokia N76 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.8
- Features
-
7.6
- Performance
-
7.6
- Cain
- Report
- 0
Please, user friendliness depends entirely on a system you are used to. So don't bring that up as any kind of advantage. Nokias and SEs are as unfriendly to me, as Motos are for you. One more really big thing - high end Motos are made from stylish and more reliable metal. Not cheap-o plastic. So in that respect, you're still not over V3 even... Let alone beautiful V6 design.
- Reply
- 2007-01-21 01:28
- m4eQ
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Forgot, thinner? maxx is 2mm thinner overall. Can you count?
106.5 x 52 x 13.7 = 172,2 (n76)
104 x 53 x 15 = 172 (maxx)
- Reply
- 2007-01-21 01:21
- TXt$
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
3 post below. Show me pictures where n76s camera is better then maxx. N76n doesnt have autofocus. Look at mobile review, theres a review on n76. I would say that maxx is a little, little bit better. Don't talk about something you dont know please.
- Reply
- 2007-01-21 01:18
- TXt$
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
while the maxx has HSDPA, bluetooth v2.0 with A2DP, touch sensitive music keys, Nvidia goforce 4800 chip, and so on
- Reply
- 2007-01-21 00:58
- PxvC
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
this beat the v6 too, fm radio, 3.5mm audio port, symbian. enough said!
- Reply
- 2007-01-20 22:01
- Pv9c
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
This phone has a 16m screen, a better camera its thinner and its way more user friendly than razr maxx v6. The only thing maxx has that n76 dosent is the hsdpa connections and little longer battery life.
- Reply
- 2007-01-20 21:03
- mJ8y
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
I think the black version looks awesome... but heck no one will buy the red version..looks like a freakin plastic toy
- Reply
- 2007-01-20 15:48
- QHVK
- U
- Cain
- Report
- 0
Well done Nokia. You have finnaly managed to beat the RAZR V3. Unfortunately RAZR V3 is years old by now, and the new Moto flagship is MAXX V6. Well, I guess a few more years...
- Reply
- 2007-01-20 11:55
- m4eZ
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
When are you going to learn that you can't compare this with a v3? It's name is RAZR MAXX V6, ok?
- Reply
- 2007-01-20 11:38
- TXt$
- U
- muyiwa
- Report
- 0
this is by far one of the slickest,slimest and sexiest phones nokia have made.this beats the V3 by far and when this phone comes out i will buy it as a birthday present for my mom
- Reply
- 2007-01-20 11:20
- M{1{
- U
- Dino
- Report
- 0
By far the most beautiful phone I have ever seen!!!
I don't want to take credit from the RAZR, because its design was revolutionary (unfortunatly only the design! no brain!), but this Nokia takes the RAZR concept design to the next level and of course adds a BRAIN.
WOW!!! I looooove my E61 but I'm gonna have to get this one as my secondary phone.
- Reply
- 2007-01-20 00:41
- BWtn
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
the battery doesnt last long does it =.= its very easy to talk one or two hours even on a mobile phone and using the mp3 player will sap energy quick aswell, i dont think that the battery will last one day if i was using it
- Reply
- 2007-01-19 16:00
- P%}i
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
wow did the designer just take a moto keypad off and put it on the nokia phone? what happened =.=
- Reply
- 2007-01-19 15:56
- P%}i
- U
- realone
- Report
- 0
Nokia is really trying to imitate the Motorola's V-series.. but unfortunately Motorola's latest RAZR maxx is unbeatable..
it's no longer unique!!!...
- Reply
- 2007-01-19 13:10
- M66B
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
The square square and more squares design is just dumb. Who is running Noookia's design dept? Fire him. I can design better phones than this.
- Reply
- 2007-01-19 10:00
- PUZe
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Up to merely 2h45min talk time? What was that.. slash 30% from the up-to. Actual talk time is even less than 2hours. Need to carry 3 batteries.
- Reply
- 2007-01-19 09:55
- PUZe
- U
