Nokia N82 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.4
- Features
-
8.6
- Performance
-
8.6
- Jon2
- Report
@Fred
The people who are giving this phone poor ratings are jealous/disappointed SE fanboys or people who can't afford to buy one. When you visit GSMArena, do not look at the ratings. Read the reviews, users' opinions, and take a look at the full specs of the phone. This is absolutely beyond a doubt the best of the best available in the market (that is, if you are after the multimedia features on a phone).
It cannot be compared to HTC TyTN II, since that phone was made strictly for BUSINESS.
And like I said previously, do not judge the phone by its ratings. These people in these forums are fools.
- Reply
- 2007-12-10 12:09
- vx6n
- U
- Scrynx
- Report
I own a N82 and N81 8gb, both are cool. I previously owned a SE P1i and N95 and they were fine. The one that says what the best phone is, is the person who has the phone, N82 isn't the best of all to everyone, but for now, it's the best for me. Battery life ain't poor, some people just overuse the phone's functions. "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder". The best phone is in the experience of the user
- Reply
- 2007-12-10 11:16
- v0XE
- U
- 666
- Report
dear shadow moon,
you know how I got my N82? I have used a K810 up till now (good phoen, my 6th SE) and was waiting for the K850. Really glad when I got it, it looks GREAT in black/green.
But everytime I wanted to go to my picture gallery, the phone blocked en fell out. Memory card was not found either (standard memory card). I tried to solve it but no use. I traded it in for the Nokia, and the N82 is better on all fronts (even much better than a properly working K850. Sorry, it's honesty, just plain honesty.
I always preferred SE above Nokia because the software is FASTER (that's why I got rid of my E65, its SLOW)but now the N82 h
- Reply
- 2007-12-10 11:10
- SgWv
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
itsa just people are now smarter, in the past n-95 have high votes because theres no competition for that phone, but afterwards there are alot of phones have the same features
the only sifference of this phone to n-95, is the xenon flash and the crappy design
and both have the poor battery
not like n-95 8gb have the better battery than this garbage
- Reply
- 2007-12-10 09:44
- vpdd
- U
- Fred
- Report
Battery is not poor, at all. Its great, at least for 3-4 days wich is suffience.
Can someone though explain the ratings this phone get? It way better then most other phones and outperforms them, but W960 gets better marks, SE K850 similar, same with HTC Touch. Its insane, one should think that ppl vote this phone down.
- Reply
- 2007-12-10 09:38
- CpZb
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Nokia N82 camera review and comparison to K850!
http://smape.com/en/reviews/no...82-prev.html
How funny sony ganboys are, K850 is pure crap compared to N82 in terms of camera, flash and overall functionality!
- Reply
- 2007-12-10 08:36
- TjQU
- U
- KG
- Report
how's the music? y thr's 2 speakers only on 1 side of the fon? izit stereo enuf? how's the quality of the case?besides tis, i think the other features r superb!! guys jz help me ans those quest k
- Reply
- 2007-12-10 07:10
- ib1G
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
can anyone help, im thinking twice to buy this one
but still the battery is still poor, like n-95 which is a big flop, and many dissappointed in 6300 battery too, and also is this also heats up the battery
- Reply
- 2007-12-10 03:23
- vpcD
- U
- ad8u
- Report
the camera speed is too slow compared to the lg viewty and se k850i, hopes the next firmware would include a faster shutter and the option to off the annoying red autofocus assist lamp....
- Reply
- 2007-12-10 03:14
- F4pr
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
ei nokia why dont you try to improve your battery pack, every phone you made have a little improvements but the battery is still crap
- Reply
- 2007-12-10 02:48
- vpb$
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Nokia envisions a future (hopefully a short-term future) where our mobile phones will be able record video in full HD-quality. It’s going to be a few years, but we should be sufficiently distracted with higher-megapixel cameras and ever faster data connection in the meantime - dare I mention ever more innovative UI’s?
“It’s coming. Technically, we are a couple of years away,” Nokia’s Chief Technology Officer Tero Ojanpera told Reuters in an interview. “It’s still a few years away.” And, with Nokia’s ability to crank out high-tech handsets out of Espoo like none-other, there’s no doubt that we’ll be seeing some sort of HD recording through Carl Zeiss optics.
If not Nokia, then another manufacturer is bound to eventually bring HD-quality video recording to market. We may soon be using HDTV-lingo while shopping for our mobile phones. What’s that? You want a phone with an 8 megapixel Carl Zeiss camera, broadband-killing wireless data, GPS, and a 720p HD video camera? No problem, just grab your checkbook.
- Reply
- 2007-12-09 19:30
- 4Bbn
- U
- SE vs NOKIA
- Report
Stop quarreling around dudes.. no point of shitting on others faces. Se are good but nokia is just better. I owned a p990i and that phone worked really well after i upgraded it to the latest firmware. Now i owned this piece and i was surprised with its performance. I really needed a super fast phone which contains everything i need. In spec wise this phone is unbeatable. I don't know any other SE phone to beat this up in that matter. However battery life really sux.. And to be honest it the operating system really sux too. I hate this operating system even there are loads of applications that runs on it.
However if you really consider that you need a super fast phone. i'd recommend this piece as i'm pleased with it. This phone is ok.. xenon flash isn't a big deal for me. I aint going around and shooting pictures all day and all night. No phone can be comparable with real cameras.
I still like SE. I'm an SE fan. But i'm so dissapointed these days since they are not providing a good competition with nokia. Still they haven't got 10 million color screen.
And yeah i use my buletooth headset (HBH-DS970)and it provides good music to my ears. very nice phone if you want an all in one device. I don't use a k850 but i don't think still images can be greater than k850 on this.
However i want to say this is a good phone. web browsing is really nice. it never slows down. I have been using this phone about 3 weeks now but still it hasn't got freeze. if it was p990i i t has been stuck at least five or 6 time by now. Very good phone. Nice sexy and cool!!
- Reply
- 2007-12-09 18:36
- w9JD
- U
- Andy Burgin
- Report
After reading a review of the N82 first impressions its sounds a good mobile indeed,but on www.mobile-review.com they have no full review yet of the battery life an the camera on the N82,it should be made available soon in the U.k networks an might try it out as a upgrade to see if it as good as my N95-3 i have,so i will keep looking now for some full reviews of the N82 now,but as soon as xmas will be over the new batch of mobiles might be available for 2008,as that what usually happens at the end an begin of every year the new releases are shown but you miss out be signing up for the first one like the N82 as its available,Nokia will also be releasing an improved version of the N82 in about 2-3 months have they have done this to the last two mobiles i had the N73 an N95
- Reply
- 2007-12-09 17:48
- 0FrI
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
He just praised quality, that's all, SE can't built a real all-in-one cell phone so he went to Nokia to get the best!
- Reply
- 2007-12-09 17:47
- 4Bbn
- U
- 666
- Report
This phone's build quality is indead fantastic, camera great, browser superb, battery life is....OK!
If you hesitate between K850 and this, well look no further.
I'm a Sony Ericsson man but this Nokia beats them all.
- Reply
- 2007-12-09 17:24
- mwpW
- U
- KOOLMAN
- Report
Could someone please tell me how bad the battery life really is? Can I at least get 2 and a half hours of talk time?
I am down to either buying N82 or Samsung G600. The only thing stopping me from getting this phone is battery life. HOW BAD IS IT REALLY?
- Reply
- 2007-12-09 16:07
- 4fbw
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
@vx6p
i got it from an authorized nokia dealer in greenhills. they gave it to me cheaper because i paid cash (P26700 otherwise). i havent checked where its made, but its the officially released localized version that has tagalog as one of the languages. i was told by nokia care that this is an advantage for the warranty because its proof that i bought it here.
i forgot to add on my first impressions that the build quality of this phone is the best ever from a nokia thats all plastic. not a single creak anywhere on the phone. ive now owned nine phones and this is the first time i got such a flawless phone. battery life is quite good too for something so fast with such a crisp display. its way better than the n95-1 and equal to the 8gb version since the bigger display consumes a lot more power. for those looking into a n95-2 or k850i, i suggest you seriously look into this first in real life. the actual product blows away any ideas youve gotten from pics or impressions from the internet. and trust me, the titanium is sweet. a white or black version would just look identical to the n73, get this unique color design instead.
- Reply
- 2007-12-09 16:05
- wY5t
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
for now its expensive but few months from now, it will go down fast, because nokia can make this phone mediocre if they release another phone better than this
nokia always compete its own products, they just release both the n-95 8gb and n82, and seems both of their phone competing each other
- Reply
- 2007-12-09 15:35
- vpcA
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed