Everybody knows now that the K850 was a flop from SE. They fail completely with the K850 but they will come back with the P5i but for now the N82 is the best cell phone on the market!
Not sure what material the N82 is built of but it does look like solid quality. I have looked at the SE 850i and it was so plastic and flimsy ,i would'nt touch it with a barge pole , i just hope that the N82 comes up trumps!
yeah the N95-3 is amazing well at least for ppl like us in the USA.I heard that w890i also work with US 3G.
Can cell phone camera's get any better than this ?
@ all mobile-review fans claiming that nokia has better sound quality than SE.
did you guys read k850i vs N95 on mobile-review ? ? did you ? ?
The N95-3 would have been the phone of the year if Nokia would have made it available for worldwide release instead of just the USA,the battery life is magic an the build of the phone is more solid than the N5-1 it doesn"t wobble at all an this is the N95 should have released instead of the ones we have available now,the N95-3 is alot better than the 8g one as well i promise you, but i still will be getting the N82 once i have read a review about its buttons an camera
hey bro..speaking about music quality..
w910i might be an exception but ...WALKMAN phones usually have better sound quality than iPods...tested and confirmed by myself.How many music phones does nokia have ? lets admit sound quality of N-serise sucks.The media player looks like shit ..pretty naive.
The worst thing is not only the media player but the headphones.Man so cheap.
And you complaing about k800i well i have never heard such problems from any of my friends who use k800..they all love it.
(BTW: Rakib I know where you are coming from and I also know that Nokia is very dominant and popular in your country.So I might guess that your opinions are a bit biased towards nokia.)
opinion: if you dont use Voip like gizmo or truphone then u should never use nokia.
very good point
It doesnt necessarily mean that people only use phones provided by their cell phone providers.People do use unbranded phones.So im sure people have used unbranded nokia phones and unbranded sony ericsson phones.
As far as I go...i never used samsung or moto.
I used more nokia phones than I have used SE.
But the fact is I like SE more than nokia.
Never shifting to nokia again.
ONLY REASON : DESIGN AND BATTERY LIFE
Nothing else ..I do not have anything personal against nokia.
Amazing features: 30 fps VGA video capture, 5MP with Xenon, Micro SD memory card up to 32GB, TV out, WIFI,Built-in GPS, 3.5 mm audio output jack...The N95 8gb converted in a candy bar format! Super! I want one now!
If this phone would have been made by SE, i would still buy it, i don't care who makes the phone, I'm just looking at the specs!
Thats the point i fully agree with and the best solution anyone has ever said...If all these specs were in s/e or samsung then yes i would buy it still ..So in reality s/e and samsung etc should bring out the same spec then have one all mighty fight between them all and see who tops
Well thanks for the info about customer satisfaction:
The report was for USA and Canada not foe Europe or Asia. Well my operator here in the USA doesnt not have even one Nokia smartphone, believe be not even a single one. So u can imagine the state of Nokia in the USA. 80% of new phones that Nokia dishes out are smartphones and we dont have even one. AT & T is the best network here in the USA and the Nokia's they have on offer would be about 3 or 4 models and even they dont have many smartphones. So its quite obvious why Nokia ranks so low on customer satisfaction. Try a similar survey in Europe or Asia and i am already sure who is market leader there.