joe, 08 Aug 2011sgs2 is better in everyway noob dual core! nokias so slow, rubbish fonesbut N9 faster than SGII. You can put them on a speed test and i bet its gonna be a white wash
hey guys check this out.....
tri.phamk2, 07 Aug 2011I think the release date is a big mistake for Nokia N9. Are you sure that you will not going t... morei think that releasing it just before the iphone 5 would be a good move as opposed to later, i mean the N8 which i am an owner of was released just after the iphon 4 which is what killed it, i mean software wise the N8 can not compeet with the iphone but hardware wise they were pretty similar, but the fact that the iphone hype was still rampant just after the n8 was released meant that people had already bough their iphones and the n8 was just another phone, i have always liked nokia and always owned nokia devices with the exception of a nexus one and i find that i love android and htc to bits but i think if nokia had polished and kept symbian up to date they would have been able to compete and i wish they did not drop meeGo because this is an OS they could really build on, they could even pull a blackberry since Meego is basically Linux and so is Android they could have worked it so that they got acces to android applications and compete that way, i have faith tought i think nokia will get back on their feet.
The N9 looks GREAT! it beats my Nokia N8 comparison between the 720p videos captured. the N9 win! the video quality is truly sharp! and the video frame rate was good! It is an amazing smartphone!
Anonymous, 07 Aug 2011does anybody have any idea when it will be released??????i aslo need to know please let me know when you find out
chester, 07 Aug 2011SGS 2 better than N9? In which area? Anyway i'm getting the N9.In Dolby Mobile sound enhancement.
Unbeliveble, 08 Aug 2011sure sgs2 better than n9. speed,screen size or os also better. Screen size does not make a phone better. Screen size is depend on user preferences. Bigger hand maybe want bigger screen, and smaller hand might want smaller screen size. Anyway, SGS2 have better processor which is dual core, better screen which is Super Amoled Plus (even though not yet officially compared with N9 Amoled screen from Nokia) and etc. Nokia N9 hv better camera, new user interface which based on swipe(which is very brilliant idea) and others as well. Anyway, all those are just hardware specification and how it will translate into performance wise will depend on how well the OS going to use it. So N9 even with less power, it might perform well than SGS 2 in real world usage if the OS (Meego OS) is really efficient in using the resource it has. My advice, no need to praise either devices, just try to use it for a while and buy the one you feel better in serving you as user. Adios!!
chester, 07 Aug 2011SGS 2 better than N9? In which area? Anyway i'm getting the N9.sure sgs2 better than n9. speed,screen size or os also better.
If N9 was not the last MeeGo from Nokia ever, then I would consider it, but now it is just an interesting but irrelevant experiment that probably will get almost no support from Nokia and the users have to develop/finish it for themself adding Adobe Flash and FM-radio and...
panky, 08 Aug 2011well n9 also made up of plastic not gold...
and frnds using sgs1 from more than 1 year with... moreAs i stated, 'from my experience' not from my assumption. Your country weather different from my country weather. And i have my out of order samsung tv, desktop monitors,phone ,all of which kaput shortly after warranty period. that is proof enuf for me. Even LG can last longer.
2) if not mistaken, N9 will not be plastic, no time to check again now
you like samsung and it works for u, good, its ur money. We will choose whichever we want to spend our money on.
r 3 b 3 l, 08 Aug 2011point 1. The AMOLED CB display on the n9 is way better that the superamoled plus screen on th... more1)Bluetooth Yes, v2.1 with A2DP, EDR
here is what gsmarena says and even nokia official website... so dnt make it 4.0( my alienware m15x have blutooth 3.0 and that is max till now)
2) here is word diffrence "amoled" and "super amoled plus" and samsung ruling amoled since sgs1.
3)i have downloaded files @15mbps using h+.....
4) samsung gives hdmi support. usb to hdmi is available even it shipped with pone from many retailers.
5) processing speed and ram is needed( its really a need for me)
6) after android 2.3.4 update battry improved even backup improved upto 70%
7) and we got video calls functionality of gtalk and skype. meego will provide that after 2,3 years :D
smooth, plastic (polycarbonate= super high quality plastic), comfortable, exciting to look at and yet it still carries that impressive power through the intense AMOLED screen and sleek Smartphone form factor that has been adopted by pretty much every Smartphone making company.
This phone is made from a single piece of polycarbonate. This means that it can take a few bumps along the way and that without as many moving parts and separate pieces that make up the unit, consumers will be receiving a much less delicate phone which cancels out the ‘worry’ factor of scratches, shattering, melting, exploding and blowing your mind.
r 3 b 3 l, 08 Aug 2011point 1. The AMOLED CB display on the n9 is way better that the superamoled plus screen on th... morei think ur Point2 is wrong...
N9 has Bluetooth 2.1 +EDR
check the official link below... for proof..
panky, 08 Aug 2011well n9 also made up of plastic not gold... and frnds using sgs1 from more than 1 year with... morethe point my friend is that you choose what you want.. and we will choose what we nokia fanboys want.. and we want nokia n9.. so clearly you samsung fanboys should leave us alone.
panky, 08 Aug 2011sgs2 is better in following points :)
super amoled plus vs amoled
bluetooth 3.0 vs 2.1
hsdp... morepoint 1. The AMOLED CB display on the n9 is way better that the superamoled plus screen on the galaxy s. Even engadget atests to that.
point 2. The nokia n9 has bluetooth 4.0 not 2.1. i.e, its better than the galax sII in that regards too!
point 3. While the galaxy supports faster speeds, your bandwidth is only as fast as your provider supports. I don't think any major provider in the US or europe supports above 7.2 mbps. The n9 supports 14.4mbps not 10mbps.
point 4. Raw processor speeds are worth nothing more than bragging rights and that too for fools. I've never seen a hands on show the n9 lag. Google 'galaxy sII lag'.
point 5. Just like processor speeds, battery capacity comparisms are plain stupid. I'm pretty sure the n9 would last longer with actual use.
point 6. I don't think either ships with hdmi support. the n9 has the hardware but no software yet. I'm pretty sure the developers are on it.
point 7. The front camera is better. Agreed. i'm not sure if the n9 even has one.
Point 8. No card slot. Agreed
Point 9. Thin maybe, light, so is the n9.
720p video from the n8, scalled up to 1080p still contains more detail than anything the galaxy s II could possibly record. I don't think the n9 would disappoint in that respect.
eagle3, 08 Aug 2011Still wouldnt for it, it's plastic. Samsung's product line from what i've experienced only las... morewell n9 also made up of plastic not gold...
and frnds using sgs1 from more than 1 year without any fail :)
for an unreleasead phone,this one got a very high 'like' from many persons. Hopefully nokia( especially step en flop) take back their words,n turn a little bit 2 the meego device. Samsung got 2 os with them,so why not nokia use 3 os. Wp7 4 high, meego 4 high n mid, symbian for mid n low n s40 4 low n lower. 2 many but stil it doesnt sound 2 much. Dont go down nokia,rise up n stay as big as u can along wit samsung,htc,se,lg,mtorla,n apple. Competition make the phone getting more n more cheaper n buy able 4 many persons. Thanks