Palm Treo 500v - user opinions and reviews

Palm

Voting results

Design
8.3
Features
8.3
Performance
8.3
Votes:
919
 Hits:
145043

Pages: 1 2 34

Since it is made by PALM its still a good phone only I prepare the Style of Treo 650 or 750 running on palm OS much more acceptable in the market if its equipped with WIFI and 3G camera

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-12 15:38
  • PSwg
  • U

This is great entry/medium level phone. Build quality is very good it's build by asus btw. Easly can be used one handed. Plenty of features for free. If you want all frills don't complain about Treo 500 just go and spend few hundreds and enjoy you dream model, but if you looking for nice and features rich tool for free. For your agenda, music, etc. you can enjoy it.

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-21 19:52
  • SwDK
  • U

When will PALM produce a phone/pda that is superior to the rest. I remember buying a 600 and at the time nothing came close.

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-10 13:07
  • 2BkX
  • U

one sentence only "dont buy this phone". The technolgy are too late compare to other brand such as O2, Dopod/HTC, imate, HP, Asus and so on...very embarassing.. ugly shape, no wifi, only 2MP, no radio, battery only 1200mAH

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-09 04:07
  • TIEf
  • U

wakala... this phone is "uglyful"... additional, what are waiting for the people of Palm to make mobilephones with Wifi support

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-05 08:59
  • iBtv
  • U

Thats right dude samsung 312mhz, thats what it saids in my 500v manual

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-30 11:00
  • 2Zuk
  • U

the processor speed is 412 MHz

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-27 18:44
  • nDVq
  • U

palm is continuing their move backwards with this. am palm user for 8 years and currently on 680. will have to wait for little longer for "smart" device from palm.

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-23 03:18
  • PFgN
  • U

why nobody know this palm 500v what processor are using now...

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-22 08:27
  • ibrD
  • U

This Palm is the most ugliest cell phone I have ever seen. Cons: the screen in too small, there is not touch screen, Windows OS, no WiFi.
Pros: The keyboard???, and it's thin.
I think Palm needs to go back to the drawing board and bring back touch screen and Palm OS.

GL

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-12 02:51
  • jjfm
  • U

Palm should be more agressive in their designs and features!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-07 19:17
  • PbWA
  • U

awesome phone just like a baby new looks smart features it one dude

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-05 07:33
  • 2A4x
  • U

This device donīt have FM stereo, PALM OS, EDGE and the display only 64 k collors. Very type of phones has 16 milliom collors or 256k collors. But, the case and stylist is very beauty.

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-01 23:07
  • Ljud
  • U

palms are good devices for general communication - talk sms mms e.mail etc - alongside organizing whatever informtion . however they are heavily dated by way of design , performance and innovation amongst other things . and though there are plenty of palm enthusiasts out there that may argue otherwise , i am most certain that a large majority of them have been dissapointed by the company on account of not meeting their expectations alongside industry standards . and until palm acts upon this matter , i think its time to move on . there are plenty of other phones out there that can better serve your communicative needs

  • Reply
  • 2007-10-30 12:51
  • YH0C
  • U

This phone is great for an entry level, now you get $100 rebate..means its FREE....no one is using WIFI on entry level phones, lets ALL be realistic, ENTRY LEVEL.....great for PALM....lets wait for the next TREO....

  • Reply
  • 2007-10-28 16:59
  • kIEj
  • U

how fast is the processor of this thing? 400mhz?

  • Reply
  • 2007-10-28 15:37
  • PFM2
  • U

smart phones are not suppose to have wifi! go ask any mobile sales person. saying a smartphone a wifi, is like saying american cars are fuel efficient. hasn't happened up to date. but maybe one day will.

  • Reply
  • 2007-10-24 15:34
  • m2hC
  • U

I am using Treo 680. Very happy with it's performance. Would like to stick to Treo brands in future, recomend the same.

  • Reply
  • 2007-10-18 10:28
  • 0ma3
  • U

From what i know, i understand that wifi is a very important feature in all pda right now, however i want ti bring out the point whereby wifi not essential but beneficial, alot of comsumers out there didnt know that by end of 3 years all subscribers has to pay singtell monthly for the wifi usage...and i believe palm feels that if u comsumers got to pay for the wifi why not bundle their products with telcom with their data plans instead...and this is the main reason y palm doesnt implement wifi in this model...

  • Reply
  • 2007-10-15 05:36
  • F4ps
  • U

Oh dear god, Just because it's a smart phone DOES NOT MEAN it has to have WIFI, when will people that slag phones because it doesn't have the specs they want realise that if they don't like the phone then DON'T LOOK IT UP!!!

Look for the phone that has the specs you want in the phone!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-10-09 20:17
  • 0pXZ
  • U
Pages: 1 2 34

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.