Palm Treo 750v - user opinions and reviews

Palm

Voting results

Design
6.8
Features
6.6
Performance
6.6
Votes:
856
 Hits:
312664

Pages: 1234 5 67

Looks great, works well but one thing's missing ,Wi-Fi support. if that's included this could be the perfect phone

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-09 14:46
  • UGpM
  • U

For those who demand higher resolution, processor, camera and others, actually they are able to manufacure a perfect one but I always believe they will never want to produce a perfect phone because no one will change or udgrade their phone if it is already perfect. The important thing I think will be what do u really want to in a phone. To me it is essential that programmes must not hanged for PDA and fast. Sorry for camera lovers, u have to look else where than the palm. That is why they are meant for executive usage. Not camera man. But I agree wifi is essential.

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-08 00:01
  • ibbs
  • U

I am use to Palm OS. When does Palm spec meet present day requiement like the O2 Trion or from the Manufacturer HTC TyTn? The Treo 680/750 profile - one hand operation is fast & desireable than O2 etc

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-06 13:22
  • PFMh
  • U

I like my Treo 600/650 ease of operation. My friend is enjoying using the Dopod 838 WiFi surfing and calling for free at Hotspots. Can Treo 680 or new Treo "690" comes with Wi-Fi also for your loyal customer to enjoy this technology.

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-06 08:35
  • PFMh
  • U

Palmone loyal customers, we are the elite, there's no doubt about it. Others only look to features and specs that mostly don't work.
We are here talking about using the phone in every moment of the day. A user friendly phone that does everything in a simple, quick and very customized way. I have tried all phones on earth and only Treo 650 and 750 satisfied my needs. After all, do you need a phone for its features or for it to serve your business and personal needs anytime and everywhere.
Palmone, keep the good work... Bravo. Zaki

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-04 17:50
  • SeFH
  • U

i beleive palm 750 are mainly for professionals... all the guys out there...please dont compare 3.2mp with this (PDA)....and for goodness....this is the best pda i ever bought!!! dont be mislead by those comments....cheers for all palm loyal fans

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-04 17:31
  • F4pr
  • U

I actually waited to buy my next PDA awaiting the 750 release....what a disappointment.
a. 1.3 camera..( ok.. maybe not so important)
b. No WIFI( In Singapore where they are going to WIMAX the island with many many hotspots, this is a major negative...)
c. 3g with no camera in the front?
d. USB sync cable still does not charge. With pervasiveness of USB, this should have been included. Saves travelers having to carry another charger around when the computer would suffice.

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-29 14:21
  • F4pr
  • U

Palm engineers could have created something better than this, I guess they're very cautious with the competence and don't want to hurry.
This phone has no wifi, however, wifi cards will work under windows mobile. The problem is that they jut out a little bit from the card slot.

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-27 18:25
  • pHuv
  • U

Palm 680/750 should research into reducing the Qwerty keyboard half size similar to the revolution SE M600 two-in-one-button, and the screen resolutions be 240X320 (or better 480X640). With future higher spec and features, size must be reduced effectively to
to give a reasoably good battery life.

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-25 06:09
  • F4pr
  • U

they dun make it any faster becuz faster processor = mroe battery usage
then they'll hafta install a bigger battery
bigger battery = bigger phone

y not buy urself a laptop then n a phone when u need to use a phone

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-24 03:12
  • 44{x
  • U

When get the first info for this PDA, almost go and buy. but after checked the spec, it do not worth with the price, agree with "yesterday technology but tomorrow's price"..
Screen resolution still 240x240, i have bad experieance with this size of screen that got so many software couldn't run well.

Screed colour, 65k.. it is really difficult to make 256k or higher?

Processor is 300Mhz.. really like to know whats the reason don't make it 400 or higher..

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-23 03:28
  • UDNh
  • U

Well I received my Treo 750v today! wooooow this thing is very fast, Ilove it don't be mislead by all the reviews below. This thing rocks, very FAST eeehaaa

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-21 04:06
  • keW0
  • U

Hooooo haaaa haaaa!!! this phone only has 300mhz processor but my PC has 3000mhz!!!!! Hooooo haaaa haaaa

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-20 15:32
  • PyyV
  • U

I wish you guys would stop beating up on Palmone. If you don't like it don't buy it, it is that simple. Go buy one that is perfect for you and good luck in finding the perfect device, oh by the way when you find the perfect device let me know so i can buy it!

PalmOne just keep doing what you'r doing

Cheers!

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-20 00:21
  • keW0
  • U

i still like 650,because of its expandability,although its got fewer functions builtin,but windows got more features builtin.most normal and business users will find windows treo more attractive and useful,while real power users will find palmos offer superior flexibility.its only let down by unable multitasking and frequent crash.palmos will never be dead!!

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-19 10:01
  • m25S
  • U

Like oftenly some people say for TREO... "tomorrow price for yesterday technology..." Geez, some people just blindfolded by their fancy qwerty.

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-17 09:18
  • PFgN
  • U

only 65k screen? what were you thinking?

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-16 20:34
  • Pdgm
  • U

I must say that I have to consider any phone with a price tag over $600USD with NO WI-FI is a slap to your intelligence! Not to mention the cheezy 1.3MP camera - r u serious??? To add insult to injury, this phone has a slow 300Mhz processor...Go look at the O2's much, much better.

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-15 22:57
  • jBU$
  • U

bloody brilliant phone, palm have really outdone themselves with this!

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-13 01:24
  • myQ5
  • U

Are you Serious?!!

Same thing as Treo 70o cdma versions.

Still no Wifi, same 240x240 screen resolution which is highly annoying and incompatable with many wm5 applications, same megapixel in camera(1.3), mini-sd????? why??, ONLY 60Mb user available memory, slower processor than a TREO 650!!!!!, bluetooth v 1.2(no bluetooth stereo headset support) and like these others guys said, no second camera for 3g video calling(Isn't that what Vodafone is KNOWN for) and yeah extremely weak battery life for a Treo.

  • Reply
  • 2006-10-12 03:40
  • kM0J
  • U
Pages: 1234 5 67

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.