Pantech PG-8000 - user opinions and reviews

Pantech

Check Price

Popularity

Daily interest
0.2%
Total hits:
282389

Voting results

Design
8.5
Features
8.3
Performance
8.3
Votes:
988

I used to have the CDMA version of this handset. The screen is great (cdma version isnt QVGA, so this one must differ to the better). Camera is excellent, this was advertised under the name 'dicafone' which means digital camera phone; the camera satisfied me alot, better than the camera found on my Sharp 902 handset.
But one this i dont like about this phone is the keypad layout, it takes alot of time getting used to.

  • Reply
  • 2005-12-01 09:27
  • UiSX
  • U

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo some
i have never seen something like diz

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-30 18:25
  • PGZ6
  • U

MBN179

You'll find the SE W900 has better voting results, although I gotta admit, I do like the look of this, good design, good features, but I just don't know how good Pantech phones are to use as they're not available here in the UK.....

I'd be interested in seeing one of these in the "flesh" - very interesting design......maybe Pantech should consider entering the UK market, I reckon there would be demand for stuff like this here....

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-29 18:06
  • MSNt
  • U

What's the video recording resolution and frames per second for this phone, why don't any specifications list for any phone specify what kind of video a phone has??

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-24 08:15
  • 4IY5
  • U

this is wat i believe is the the best phone of 05 and 06 it is amazing i mean don't take my opinion look at the voting results and if u see anything higher then that then tell me ....

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-24 04:14
  • 42th
  • U

dis looks like a DC

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-24 00:44
  • nyFH
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.