Nokia 808 PureView in focus: Interview with D. Dinning
HTC One S review: OnederfulPhilips 180 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
5.4
- Features
-
5.2
- Performance
-
5.7
- What The Fuc_?
- Report
- 0
As my name states, what the fuc_?
I mean, this is 2006 (soon to be 2007) dammit! How can you possibly think of bringin out a non-coloured screen???
UNACCEPTABLE! It doesnt even have MP3 or 40channels polyphonic sounds! UNACCEPTABLE!
Not even a VGA camera! UNACCEPTABLE!
- Reply
- 2006-12-24 08:34
- pu6b
- U
- the phone guru
- Report
- 0
it completely sucks i mean you could of aleast given it a coluor screen or something decent to make it worth while buying i mean all these bussines men want a phone with alot of talk time but it needs to look a bit flashy.A camara at least could have been put in or even bluetooth little things make a big difference when you arebuying a phone.
apart from all that its an alright phone.
- Reply
- 2006-12-16 23:23
- mQpr
- U
- mforce2
- Report
- 0
Just check out the new Motofone , it will kick this phone's ass. They both do the same things but the Motofone is so much better and it has class which this one totally lacks.
- Reply
- 2006-11-30 16:42
- nDRM
- U
- kuso
- Report
- 0
Nice! This thing isn't meant to take drunken pics, or post to your uber-cool blog.
This is made to talk. 7 hours of talk time is pretty damn good, and I like that they're "looking back to step forward".
Bravo.
- Reply
- 2006-11-27 22:12
- Y9eu
- U
- Michael
- Report
- 0
Guys, you need to realise that just like a teenager who likes to have everything from itunes to a 4mpx camera on their phone, there are business users out there who just want a mobile phone for their employees. This is proven in Australia as Telstra released a popular Nokia MINUS the camera and not surprisingly, most of the buyers were business owners.
If I owned a trade business and needed 10 phones for my employees, I wouldn't want them wasting time taking photos or swapping silly pics or ringtones. This saves thousands of dollars in lost productivity time.
At the end of the day, Phillips are very smart to bring this out.
- Reply
- 2006-11-18 05:07
- x{W4
- U
- love
- Report
- 0
I think that philips may have been slightly too budget concious this thing has less features than my housephone: literally.
- Reply
- 2006-10-20 02:17
- YHaA
- U
- blq
- Report
- 0
OMFG
what a totally lowend?
what is it good for?
the past is all thats gone. that's all my comments.
- Reply
- 2006-10-11 23:32
- mMIH
- U
- mforce
- Report
- 0
I know this is supposed to be a simple plain phone and all but seriously now I think Philips took things a step too far this time. If I want something like this I might as well get it used for free because someone dumped a good old Nokia or something.
- Reply
- 2006-10-11 16:53
- nDLT
- U
