Philips 390 - user opinions and reviews

Philips

Voting results

Design
6.4
Features
5.8
Performance
6.2
Votes:
72
 Hits:
42222

old technology in all philips phone...look at other brands which more popular!Philips can't make 3G phone or higher resolution of camera!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-16 06:36
  • M@T2
  • U

tis pone dosn't hav bluetooth...this phone hav wap (GPRS)

  • Reply
  • 2008-03-14 15:51
  • w9L@
  • U

wap is avilable with this phone .admin u hav to put correct details

  • Reply
  • 2008-03-14 15:45
  • w9L@
  • U

GPRS is avilable in this phone

  • Reply
  • 2008-03-14 15:41
  • w9L@
  • U

nice phone but it dosen't have bluetooh,if it has bluetooh grate phone

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-21 07:05
  • w9L@
  • U

i have saw this phone before,nice looking,very classic,but no bluetooth. bluetooth very important for me. Philips 390 NOT MY CHOICE !sorry!

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-25 06:31
  • ib4D
  • U

it hasn got to add jar

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-19 14:44
  • p2rR
  • U

al........you have a problem!
if philips trust cec with their name,i think cec is not so bad after all!

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-02 10:47
  • Mv6$
  • U

bad camera and video especialyy dark videos and pictures.other features are good mp3.web cam,usb file transfer,3 different theme,3 embeded game

  • Reply
  • 2007-08-23 21:30
  • p2Di
  • U

All made by CEC. China Electronics Company, who bought the whole Philips Mobile Phones business. The "Xenium" brand, which is associated with long-battery life, is transferred to CEC under the terms of the agreement. CEC has received an exclusive license to market and sell mobile phones under the Philips brand for the coming five years.

  • Reply
  • 2007-08-16 22:25
  • mtQ2
  • U

who bought the whole Philips Mobile Phones business. The "Xenium" brand, which is associated with long-battery life, is transferred to CEC under the terms of the agreement. CEC has received an exclusive license to market and sell mobile phones under the Philips brand for the coming five years.

  • Reply
  • 2007-08-16 22:22
  • mtQ2
  • U

No JAVA...
Unfriendly t9...

  • Reply
  • 2007-08-03 01:46
  • p3cg
  • U

this is no use to me
i need bluetooth .

also its rather old looking

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-27 13:17
  • pw6%
  • U

Nice phone,good features but bluetooth is missing!

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-23 20:28
  • n3Bg
  • U

this will never sell for a good price .
only a low price hence its poor .

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-23 05:18
  • nHTY
  • U

annonced in may 2007 and no bluetooth... wow this phone ganna suck

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-23 01:38
  • 0aZ1
  • U

WOW! I mean WOW!, you cant get a phone thats more of a rip-off than this! I mean go to LG and look at their CHOC phones, I mean honesly there r like now 20 phones that all look like this, except that at least LG ones have blutooth, Shame phillips

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-10 04:55
  • PTUh
  • U

it's looking good

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-10 15:23
  • Pxxd
  • U

if you pay more than £50 for this you were robbed its a sorry excuse for a low end mobile there are better and cheaper out there.

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-08 19:05
  • pJDs
  • U

I bought one unit in Malaysia. superb sound reproduction for the MP3 and has got a cable with it. I am happy to pay the price for these basic model. The price is good for the features.

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-07 10:59
  • 2mAj
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.