Philips 392 - user opinions and reviews

Philips

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
69250

Voting results

Design
5.4
Features
4.2
Performance
4.5
Votes:
10


Sort by:

> In reply to M Mangape @ 2008-12-12 07:49 from PGLM - click to readyou just match ur passcode with another mobile
Eg:- if u type passcode on ur mobile then u
should type on another mobile also then ur bluetooth will be activated then enjoy ur self

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-17 17:59
  • ttvR
  • R

i own the mobile 392 and am very happy. u can't get anything better at this price.. if u wanted a lot specifications go for a costlier one.

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-28 18:57
  • PA$E
  • U

I have bought a Philips 392 recently am very disappointed with it. The blue tooth is not prompting for passcode, somethings thats not in the users mannual and I cannot use the blue tooth.

Disappointed

  • Reply
  • 2008-12-12 07:49
  • PGLM
  • H

Yes this phone is 100% chinese rebrand. I have 1 demo set with me now. Unfriendly user, no EDGE and camera VGA only. Think before you buy...

  • Reply
  • 2008-12-12 06:51
  • wc6x
  • R

This phone has NO JAVA support... Very dissapointed! Despite all the web site info claiming this phone has JAVA support, it do not!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-24 12:23
  • uCLH
  • C

hey philips 392 are very good and i just bought yesterday and its working very good.philips 392 you should get it now...

  • Reply
  • 2008-05-17 06:36
  • ibch
  • U

i just bought philip 392 yesterday and its not really good....i prefer p1i and i mean sony ericsson...they r the best.....thank you

  • Reply
  • 2008-03-29 15:01
  • ib41
  • U

IMO, it looks like CECT phones.

  • Reply
  • 2008-03-26 09:30
  • PB1{
  • U

nice phone!i can say!but, the Samsung phones or even Nokia are way better!By the way, i though LG was Philips!really, i think i've seen it somewhere!

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-19 22:56
  • nmDY
  • U

its good until firmware gets nasty and your phone goes dead whit no firmware on the internet to download and repair your phone

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-06 13:54
  • 0n1I
  • U

i like the look of this phone, it may be a very simple phone but thats what a lot of people want

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-05 00:57
  • PBhb
  • U

its exactly a rebrand of china cect phone

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-02 09:03
  • ib18
  • U

phillips can't make a decent house phone, nevermind a cellie.

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-02 05:40
  • 4{Cn
  • U

It probably has more options than you think. It's so new, and GSM Arena is sometimes wrong on phone specs when they re first posted. You guys are complaining like you already bought the phone and it is a bad purchase. Relax.

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-01 20:09
  • 0hVB
  • U

No EDGE, no 3G, no WLAN, 1,3 mpix camera...
Philips must be joking. Is this how they do in so highly competitive mobile phones market ??

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-01 09:28
  • nnZY
  • U

Philips.nice touch emabled phone but why dont u make somthing 16 million colours?ok no offence bt av got 2 mo words 4 dis phone n thats SIMPLY PATHETIC!

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-01 06:52
  • M@T2
  • U

100% cect phonr. same design same futures. so 100% chinese, with european brand

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-31 17:23
  • mA@v
  • U

1st one!

OMG!!! what a beautiful century pioneer b889 clone!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-31 07:17
  • P%34
  • U

though philips has the best batteries

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-31 01:30
  • nyte
  • U

My thoughts - No.

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-31 01:01
  • vCF%
  • U
Sort by:
Total of 25 user reviews and opinions for Philips 392.