Philips 650

Philips

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
190889

Voting results

Design
7.5
Features
7.4
Performance
7.5
Votes:
11

Also known as Xenium 9@9c

General 2G Network GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
SIM Mini-SIM
Announced 2004, 2Q
Status Discontinued
Body Dimensions 88 x 46 x 24.5 mm (3.46 x 1.81 x 0.96 in)
Weight 93 g (3.28 oz)
Display Type STN, 65K colors
Size 128 x 160 pixels, 7 lines
 - Second external monochrome display (80 x 48 pixels)
- Screensavers and wallpapers
- Downloadable logos
Sound Alert types Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic ringtones
Loudspeaker Yes
3.5mm jack No
Memory Card slot No
Phonebook 1000 x 5 fields, Photo call
Call records 30 received, dialed and missed calls
Internal 7 MB
Data GPRS Class 10 (4+1/3+2 slots), 32 - 48 kbps
EDGE No
WLAN No
Bluetooth No
Infrared port Yes
USB  
Camera   No
Features Messaging SMS, EMS, MMS, Email
Browser WAP 1.2.1
Radio No
Games Yes + Java downloadable
GPS No
Java Yes, MIDP 2.0
Colors 3 - Executive Grey, Discerning Blue, White Bond
 - Predictive text input
- Organizer
- Voice memo/dial
- World clock
- Optional digital VGA camera and TV-out
Battery   Li-Ion 1100 mAh battery
Stand-by Up to 720 h
Talk time Up to 8 h 3 min

Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more

Philips 650 - user opinions and reviews

  • james fuentes

The last great phone philips ever made...everything went downhill after...

  • Reply
  • 2009-02-02 18:41
  • RKnu
  • C
  • AH

Wow, thank GOD! I hunted high and low for this phone as my old 9@9c konked (LCD connector broke so I cannot view msgs). Had to rely on long-press #7 to return call to every person who had missed call. I managed to backed up my numbers using the conne...

  • Reply
  • 2006-08-09 06:21
  • PWVu
  • U
  • Jaro

This Phone has got a lot of advantages & disavantages. The Battery is Perfect, it holds up to 3 weeks. The design is also perfect, but the phone is a little bit Fat |to big for pocket|. Also I have got some problems by receiving calls. There are c...

  • Reply
  • 2006-08-03 17:46
  • mDu%
  • U