Philips 650

Philips

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
193127

Voting results

Design
7.5
Features
7.4
Performance
7.5
Votes:
11

Also known as Xenium 9@9c

Network Technology GSM
2G bands GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
GPRS Class 10
EDGE No
Launch Announced 2004, 2Q
Status Discontinued
Body Dimensions 88 x 46 x 24.5 mm (3.46 x 1.81 x 0.96 in)
Weight 93 g (3.28 oz)
SIM Mini-SIM
Display Type STN, 65K colors
Size 128 x 160 pixels, 7 lines
 - Second external monochrome display (80 x 48 pixels)
- Screensavers and wallpapers
- Downloadable logos
Memory Card slot No
Phonebook 1000 x 5 fields, Photo call
Call records 30 received, dialed and missed calls
Internal 7 MB
Camera   No
Sound Alert types Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic ringtones
Loudspeaker Yes
3.5mm jack No
Comms WLAN No
Bluetooth No
GPS No
Infrared port Yes
Radio No
USB
Features Messaging SMS, EMS, MMS, Email
Browser WAP 1.2.1
Games Yes + Java downloadable
Java Yes, MIDP 2.0
 - Predictive text input
- Organizer
- Voice memo/dial
- World clock
- Optional digital VGA camera and TV-out
Battery   Li-Ion 1100 mAh battery
Stand-by Up to 720 h
Talk time Up to 8 h 3 min
Misc Colors 3 - Executive Grey, Discerning Blue, White Bond

Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more

Philips 650 - user opinions and reviews

  • james fuentes

The last great phone philips ever made...everything went downhill after...

  • Reply
  • 2009-02-02 18:41
  • RKnu
  • C
  • AH

Wow, thank GOD! I hunted high and low for this phone as my old 9@9c konked (LCD connector broke so I cannot view msgs). Had to rely on long-press #7 to return call to every person who had missed call. I managed to backed up my numbers using the conne...

  • Reply
  • 2006-08-09 06:21
  • PWVu
  • U
  • Jaro

This Phone has got a lot of advantages & disavantages. The Battery is Perfect, it holds up to 3 weeks. The design is also perfect, but the phone is a little bit Fat |to big for pocket|. Also I have got some problems by receiving calls. There are c...

  • Reply
  • 2006-08-03 17:46
  • mDu%
  • U