Reviews - Reader comments

Nokia Lumia 630/635 review: Bottom up

Nokia Lumia 630/635 review: Bottom up - read the full textOne of the first phones to launch straight to Windows Phone 8.1, the Lumia 630 is also the first to bring dual-SIM support to the platform. That said, we should note right at the start that we’re reviewing the regular, single-SIM version...


Sort by:

+ Battery life (45% after 24hrs here)
+ Smooth and responsive despite not having loads of RAM
+ Good camera, even without a flash
+ Good display, colours look good and res is about enough

- Only QWERTY keyboard. Someone still wants a 12-key one
- Still a little less customizable than Android devices
- Surely a flash wouldn't have hurted

It exceeded my expectations until now, very good for a product that is meant to be nearly entry-level.

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-29 13:43
  • SgvF

satisfied with the phone. i would recomend to any 1.

+ super fast & smooth (thn samsung)
lovely display
reasonable App support
gd battery

- Medscape is not for offline use
List view is annoying
IE5 & video should be improved
No cable n headset n thts horribl
need more shortcuts (3G/Data)

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-27 10:06
  • XNpC

I haven't got the Lumia 630 yeah but I am very excited for it at first but now I look at the comments

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-27 05:58
  • jBuu

can i get cortona in my lumia 630

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-26 19:54
  • bCic

I'm using Nokia Lumia 630
It's An absolutely best smartphone at Lumia market
Main feature is typing performance and spead is so amazing with this quad core processor
It's. Superb

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-24 14:46
  • fCx%

> In reply to YazanS8003 @ 2014-08-22 16:26 from m@Dx - click to readVery well said.what can u do with 1.5gb memory only?and in this Lumia u have 5gb internal,as well as u can transfer apps and games to sd.i.e all the 128 Gb is for u to enjoy.what a great feature it is.isn't it!

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-22 19:32
  • rKwn

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2014-07-29 09:18 from rAeA - click to readThe Nokia lumia 630 is a lot better than the Sony Xperia M because of its speed , software support , better camera , superb battery life , bigger and better screen , and higher internal memory.

The Xperia M is better in looking more beautiful , having a flash light , and a secondary camera .

If I was you I would choose the Lumia 630 over the Xperia M anytime.

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-22 16:26
  • m@Dx

> In reply to antu007 @ 2014-08-07 17:54 from X0JQ - click to readIt is 4MP samples if you are shooting in the 16:9 ((full screen)) aspect ratio of you opted for the 4:3 you will get 5MP .

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-22 15:23
  • m@Dx

Tooo much charge hungry... And heating..... Otherwise its a good phone at 14k in Bd.

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-19 23:03
  • X{XI

good phone using it for the past few months and no lag installed asphault 8 graphics and performance is not compromised i have asphault 8 on my galaxy s4 and it lags sometime on that . and the best part is the camera quality it clicks preety decent photos and shoots quality 720 p videos with any noise in background go for it.

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-18 15:59
  • ut@b

Why can't I get Google Chrome? I have saved loads of stuff on Google Keep, but cannot transfer this to my Nokia 635. Can anyone help; please

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-16 21:41
  • sXcR

Sound quality is better than 1020, affordable, Nokia maps, e-mail configuration, I think so I am good with this phone at least for 1 & half year. How the back cover comes out, that's great compared to other phones.
Nokia team will be proud with this phone.

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-13 05:47
  • b2gI

Help me

How long will it take to power ON for the first time.
Because I am unable to power it ON as I bought it yesterday

Help me

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-09 07:25
  • fCxr

does it has 4 mp camera??or it has 4 mp camera ...becz when i click and want to show detail shows picture quality 4 mp ....pls reply...

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-07 17:54
  • X0JQ

does it has 4 mp camera??or it has 4 mp camera ...becz when i click and want to show detail shows picture quality 4 mp ....pls reply...

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-07 17:49
  • X0JQ

> In reply to harry @ 2014-07-31 18:36 from nw}E - click to readNo it's really elder son has this one but actually it always with's super fast.doesn't Lag.everything is super smooth.that's the speciality of window phone.

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-05 17:29
  • rKwi

> In reply to harry @ 2014-07-31 18:36 from nw}E - click to readReally? But why most of the people comment here says the opposite?

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-05 03:09
  • PA7E

> In reply to priya @ 2014-07-19 15:02 from U{vv - click to readWindows phone does not require antivirus. This is not an android phone remember

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-02 17:13
  • fCxH

> In reply to harry @ 2014-07-31 18:36 from nw}E - click to readNo not at all, iam using this phone since one and half month now, not even one problem uptil now. And about the speed of phone it is very fast dude.

I have installed so many apps, the storage is just about to get exausted but the phones performance is not degraded even one percent.

You r lying

  • Reply
  • 2014-08-02 17:07
  • fCxH

This Nokia lumier 630 phone that iv purchased is without doubt the worst phone iv ever had in my life.the tv advert says its really fast is false.its not fast at all.and when your on a website you get interupted with the message Cannot load this page all the time.we should be able to take the phone back to the shop for a refund.i wouldn't reccomend this phone to anyone.

  • Reply
  • 2014-07-31 18:36
  • nw}E

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.