LG KG920 vs. SE K800 vs. Nokia N73: One more photo shootout
Recently we've got LG K920 for testing; this is one of the first 5MP camera GSM phones available on the market. We've decided that it's a good idea to test it against one of the best currently available 3MP camera phones, and also great rivals - Sony Ericsson K800 and Nokia N73.
- HadiKhan
- Report
K800i is the winner...SE always win in the camera department.
- Reply
- 2009-05-06 17:34
- uWB7
- Eric
- Report
wohoo if the 3rd picks are made with n73 then nokia rocks!!!! ^ ^
- Reply
- 2009-03-15 21:58
- nDQb
- Fede
- Report
> In reply to Yezzed @ 2009-02-09 15:35 from ibgkYezzed, sorry but your comment doesn't make sense. You said "K800i using SONY lens (Cybershot) in it camera, when the nokia using third party lens in their camera (Carl Zeiss). This prove thats SE trust their own product to make quality, and Nokia use third party lens coz they doesn't have their own brand lens. Nokia are desperated to use other brand to make quality."
Do you know what brand of lenses does Sony use for their Cybershot digital cameras? Exactly, Carl Zeiss...
- Reply
- 2009-02-23 06:34
- PdiM
- Yezzed
- Report
Compare with N73 vs K800i:
-k800i have best quality in sound compare ti N73 just have good cracking sound. (do not compare using the speakerphone, use the headphone. Using the speakerphone, not give u quality, it just give u loudness only.)
-K800i hav xenon flashlight, compare to n73 just have LED light.
-we can modified the sound and camera driver in SE firmware to produce better that factory default. And nokia still use the same, and cannot be our own custom. In this fact, we can make our own taste of sound and camera quality (depend on your experience) if you use SE phone.
-K800i using SONY lens (Cybershot) in it camera, when the nokia using third party lens in their camera (Carl Zeiss). This prove thats SE trust their own product to make quality, and Nokia use third party lens coz they doesn't have their own brand lens. Nokia are desperated to use other brand to make quality.
- 3 years ago, i'm a nokia diehard user for 5 years. Lastly, i found that their product are worthless to compare with the money that i gave them to get their product. Slowly, i stop to using nokia product, and try to change to another brand. I try SE and feel love to this brand coz their quality, and use it till now.
- Lastly, SE are for pro. NOKIA are for dummies... ;-)
- Reply
- 2009-02-09 15:35
- ibgk
- alex
- Report
well i had a k850I and traded it for a n73,i'm really against phone photography and even if k850i is a newer and more expensive phone i thinkt that n73 is better.so my oppinion is if u want a real phone xp go for N73 and if u need photos..use a digital cammera,even a 2 mp one fromn 5 years ago make photos better than a phone..so think out of the box and forget the phone's camera..
- Reply
- 2008-12-10 15:42
- nDE%
- Ravy
- Report
4me, i think that to compare k800 whith n 73, it has many thing to say. But for the price, have you thought yet? For n73, it's more expensive than k800. So n73 is better than k800 because it like a mini PC. It has RAM and CPU that it's more useful.
- Reply
- 2008-12-03 03:55
- Rnpf
- rabibd
- Report
Hi I'm from Dhaka(Bangladesh). I used SAMSUNG G600,SE K800 and Nokia N73ME.G600 is the worst.u get all blurry picture but still object picture r good,as a whole bad invest. Sony ericsson K800i is a good fone but bad to say that n73 picture r much clear than k800i, but k800 autofocus works fast.The best all time picture is from N73 albeit. But i'm a hard fan of Sony Ericsson for their userfriendly interface.General comment-SE is best for Mp3quality even a k series sound better than other brands music fone!!Nokia N series uses Carl-zeiss lense so picture is far better than cybershot.Nokia a bit complicated interface but if u like symbian no alternative of Nokia.Nokia good in picture but average in Music , SE good for music but average for picture, SAMSUNG no good!!!Mail me if any q: rabiulis@gmail.com
- Reply
- 2008-11-28 19:35
- PG00
- Shaggy Swan
- Report
OMG no doubt in this shootout simply k800i wins, im using n73 but after that shootout want to get k800 bcoz its camra of cybershot is perfect and its autofocus is mindblowing. yea in other words k800 rox
- Reply
- 2008-11-13 13:43
- uWxf
- VicKy
- Report
i have the K800i and Cyber-shot rules it all of N73...great pics, beautiful display and sound too fair enough; it a guy thing people, gota get it for sure........bingo !
- Reply
- 2008-11-11 10:56
- PT2S
- Fahad
- Report
well i m da sony ericsson fan... nd frm start i m using sony ericsson...
nw a dayz i m using SE K800... well i had used w700i... i will say tht w700i also can beat n73...SE k800 ki to baat he na karo.. well i read a comment tht n73 plays acc nd wma.. bt tht person dnt knw tht SE K800 can also play wma nd acc... nd at da end i vill say tht nokia sucks.. SONY ERICSSON ZINDABAD
- Reply
- 2008-11-08 11:02
- 2Adg
- brill
- Report
any one can tell me the price of nokia N73? i plan to buy N73 But i dont have any idea if how much the cost for this yr. 2008.
- Reply
- 2008-11-04 04:41
- v0Xt
- Zone
- Report
who's ready to be defeated by n 96? it rocks.
I'm a nokia fan but i feel k800i and N73 are great matches.
- Reply
- 2008-10-14 17:41
- mJZe
- Nithin
- Report
I am a great fan of photography and i currently own a samsung g600.I read the shoot out b/w the three phones.I really liked d images of kg920,but leave it coz 3mp is different frm 5 mp.So i recommend not 2 compare lg with a class of its own.My focus is on the other two se and nokia.I really feel that if u want an alround perfomance along with a great camera,u have 2 go for 73 as it offers great functionality that se doesn't offer.But if u r really concerned abt photography and editing images,i recommend u se.
By the way,samsung g600 is also an excellent camera phone for its price range.
- Reply
- 2008-08-18 06:36
- k9W{
- vesko
- Report
I will buy Nokia because is very good phone... but LG too is very good ...
- Reply
- 2008-06-19 19:09
- 0nni
- bryan
- Report
i brought my SE k800i phone here in the Philippines it just cost P8290 or $188 with 30 days warranty only ( if with 1 year warranty $220 ).. i guess with my experienced SE far exceeds other 3MP nokia phones. frankly, nokia is common and its a bit redundant in its designs and display themes. i have read in a study that Nokia puts "color" overly saturated thus making the image more appealing to the user but in photography experts overly saturated photos is a "NO NO" unlike with SE, colors are in natural even in total darkness with its bright xenon flash like any other digicam would suggest. SE have more innovations and the cybershot image looks so amazing like any other sony digital camera products. Well sony have been known for its tough and reliable technology innovations as well as ericsson in networking business.. A better fusion of two great big companies. Nokia only conceived people and the expensive price is not paid back afterall.
- Reply
- 2008-06-05 16:16
- wu4Q
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed