Reviews - Reader comments

Sony Ericsson K810 review: A Cyber-shot is reborn

Sony Ericsson K810 review: A Cyber-shot is reborn - read the full textWhen it comes to cameraphones, the words K800 Cyber-shot always seem to come to mind. The time has come to finally forget it since the famous cameraphone has received a successor in the face of the spanking new Sony Ericsson K810. The same exciting 3.2 megapixel camera packed into a slimmer body and a brand new design.

 

THis is the best phone from sony ericsson now...and it takes excellent pictures...I will buy it..

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-05 12:20
  • mA%Y

why do they still use a joystick?
i used to have SE's but the joysticks are dustcollectors and after a few moths they dont't work like they used to.

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-04 20:32
  • mKDu

can.. Anyone tell me... how good is the sound quality.. Is it better than K790i which has a terrible external speaker

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-22 08:17
  • TR9e

saw the pictures.....it is not so nice for the outdoor..
does not look like taken from a 3.2MP..
the color not nice ...

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-11 09:21
  • F4pr

hi friends, when we check the photo samples of SE K790 and SE K810 in www.GSMARENA.com, i feel K790 is much better than K810,

no improvements in new one,
hope for the best in final release.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-09 12:08
  • 2SRc

Guys out there seems to be blind thatf 5mp images produced by a phone has excellent quality over the lower resolution ones. 5mp pictures by a phone has nothing to win over a 4mp images produced by a digital camera with a CCD sensor. instead of relying on the megapixels what if you people take an eye to the more important aspects like ISO sensitivity,Aperture and shutter priority and the sensor size and type the camera uses. i would bet that if SE would produce 4mp phone using a CCD sensor,manual mode calibrator and better ISO sensitivity then any phone out there even sporting 8 megapixel without those features won't won over that SE. megapixels don't improve image quality that much instead it just make more details for better viewing but if the sensor or any component is poor that multimegapixel camera won't make good.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-03 12:51
  • whBg

I will buy it

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-02 18:45
  • nTJC

yes it can work on a 2G only GSM network, don't worry

the buttons are actually not as bad as they seem, I find them acceptable

and the design is starting to grow on me, for some weird reason, I thought it was really ugly, too when it was first announced.

the keys are not rubber-plated, so there'll be nothing to scratch off, the much thinner body and improved camera lens protector are all pluses

also note that the phone runs faster than the K800i

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-01 18:54
  • AMxS

Can a 3G phone (k810) work in a GSM frequence?; I really don't know, so I would be very glad if somebody answers my question. Thank you.

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-31 02:00
  • Pb0m

buttons luk dodgy

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-30 19:01
  • mXTm

Does anyone know how much it costs in Europe ???

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-29 13:24
  • mc26

very...very...beautiful!!!! its miraculous

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-27 19:52
  • P7wX

They said......
"Our final verdict is that given the serious design flaws and the lack of serious upgrades, you should stay with the Sony Ericsson K800 until a better cameraphone comes up on the market."

and so i will until SE up the video capabilities
throw in minimum 1GB memory and the MP camera is at least 5MP.

I have seen so many SE variations of the other models that it was anticipated that soon enough the K800i would get its sibling and so it has but unfortunatly it is not next generation or including the above "my phone wish list specification"

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-22 03:16
  • mAm}

j: t68 was made by Ericsson and T68i was made by Sony Ericsson. :P

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-20 10:47
  • m{Cq

K800i not having A2DP is wrong, it's was actuallay one of the first that had it. :)

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-20 10:45
  • m{Cq

Nice mobile. The design is better than in K800 =)

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-19 20:17
  • PdC}

How can making a phone smaller make it a waste of time? Only people that have a K800i will be a bit peeved. I never got the K800i cause it was too thick.

Problem solved.

Also A2DP is on, it wasn't on the K800i. And for the love of god, who uses IR anymore, could have had something else instead of using the space.

Also I agree that Nokia release phones over and over that are the same... look at every "i" version that comes out!

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-19 20:05
  • Nxsf

as if nokia doesnt do the same looking phones with different numbers for name! haha!

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-19 12:45
  • 2Ami

Wots up with SE? They just seem to put an old phone in a new shell and hope for the best. They've done it with the W880 as well. I sell phones for a living and aside from the appearance there is next to no differance between the SE W850 and the SE W880. If fact the 880 is worse because it doesnt have a radio! I am expecting the same from the k810 compared to the k800. SE have done this before as well. Anybody remember the T68 and its replacement the T68i? how about the T610 and the T630? come on SE boo your ideas up and release a NEW phone.

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-18 08:10
  • MSNb

I'm using n73 and although its slow in multi tasking,but its a SYMBIAN phone and symbian phones tend to lag.get a nokia!

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-17 17:14
  • RIFD

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.